2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

What changes for the 2017 f150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 08-05-2016, 03:39 PM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggums
I drove one for two weeks, it was difficult for me to beat EPA's estimates with the EB, but have been easily doing that in my V8. Looking at Fuelly, the V8 gets identical gas mileage as the EB. I suppose it would be easier to achieve EPA in the EB if I had a light 2WD model. It just seems that gas mileage in the EB gets hit hard whenever asked to perform more.
You need the right axle ratio to achieve EPA estimates no matter what you drive. I'm doing it with my 2011 truck with the 3.31 axles.
 
  #17  
Old 08-05-2016, 04:08 PM
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Wiggums is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Both had 3.55's for sure. I checked. If I go really easy and do not use the turbo in the EB, gas mileage can be really good. With a 4x4 and hills, that's much more difficult. Between 3.31 and 3.55, the difference is tiny.
 
  #18  
Old 08-06-2016, 10:18 AM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,366
Received 214 Likes on 180 Posts
I found that I was getting ~~ 19 MPG driving around town yesterday (3.5L EB, with 3.31 gears). You really have to watch the instantaneous MPG display; especially when accelerating or going uphill. Stoplights were killer, but if you nursed it along, it didn't do too badly.

Coming up the mountain was another story.
 
  #19  
Old 08-06-2016, 10:49 AM
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Wiggums is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
I went up the mountain to Big Bear and back. It takes about four hours. I reset both the 5.0 and EB at the same. I left at the same time and traffic was identical. The V8 got better gas mileage.

However, the EB got better gas mileage on flat surface. I was disappointed EB didn't get that far above EPA's estimated mileage while I could with the V8. Going 60 mph on a flat surface, I can get 28 mpg on my V8 4x4 Supercrew 3.55.
 
  #20  
Old 08-06-2016, 11:33 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggums
I went up the mountain to Big Bear and back. It takes about four hours. I reset both the 5.0 and EB at the same. I left at the same time and traffic was identical. The V8 got better gas mileage.

However, the EB got better gas mileage on flat surface. I was disappointed EB didn't get that far above EPA's estimated mileage while I could with the V8. Going 60 mph on a flat surface, I can get 28 mpg on my V8 4x4 Supercrew 3.55.
The 5.4L has been gone long enough for people to forget that the 3.5L replaced that engine. The 3.5L is a tow monster and will excel under load. If MPG's are the primary concern, then my I suggest a Fusion 2.5L n/a. My daughter got over 35 MPG's going to Illinois and back traveling through West Virginia.
 
  #21  
Old 08-06-2016, 11:49 AM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,366
Received 214 Likes on 180 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggums
I went up the mountain to Big Bear and back. It takes about four hours. I reset both the 5.0 and EB at the same. I left at the same time and traffic was identical. The V8 got better gas mileage.
Funny. We went up & back to Bear Valley a few months ago. Mileage going up wasn't too bad as the climb is very gradual. I was getting maybe 17-18 MPG doing the uphill. We filled up the tank at Bear Valley before we left, and for the first 5 or so miles, the instantaneous readout was showing 99 MPG. After about 10 miles, it had settled in to ~~ 40-43 MPG, and it wasn't until the slope started to level out that the MPG got into the 20s. We then turned south on 49 down to Columbia, and I was still in the mid 20s. Finally, we got on the freeway coming back into the Bay Area, and I noted that we still had 23 MPG when we got to Saratoga.
 
  #22  
Old 08-06-2016, 01:24 PM
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Wiggums is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
The 5.4's were intended to be tow monsters that disappointed instead. The 5.0 has way more power and can tow much more. The 3.5 can tow a bit more but at a steep cost to the fuel economy.

My 5.0 V8 got 28 mpg going 60 mph for over an hour, all flat terrain from L.A. to San Diego. That's where the EB would get better gas mileage. I make that trip daily from office to office and I have two to choose from, the V8 or the EB. I have inflated tires to 45 psi, I have taken things out of the back, I have tested 55 mph, 65 mph, and 75 mph. EB's do much worse at 75 mph compared to V8, but at 55 mph, EB's did slightly better as long as there's no spooling. And it's pretty hard not to do that especially when I'm going uphill or moving after stopping.

I used to go up to Big Bear almost every two weeks so I'm familiar with it. I always filled up at the same gas station and drove up there usually at 4 a.m. before the traffic comes in so the driving pattern is very consistent. EB's got consistently worse gas mileage. Wasn't the case on flat surface.

I used to reset up there and see how much I can get the computer to show. I think my record was 47 after three hours of driving from Big Bear to San Diego. I went REALLY light on the gas, braked only when I had to, slowed down before red lights anticipating green lights, never went above 55 mph, etc.
 
  #23  
Old 08-06-2016, 02:50 PM
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Wiggums is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
Anyways, I don't expect a lot of changes for the 2017 model except for the 10-speed transmission and the new Ecoboost V6. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
 
  #24  
Old 08-07-2016, 06:16 PM
Spamfritter's Avatar
Spamfritter
Spamfritter is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Dallas / Ft. Worth Area
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiggums
I drove one for two weeks, it was difficult for me to beat EPA's estimates with the EB, but have been easily doing that in my V8. Looking at Fuelly, the V8 gets identical gas mileage as the EB. I suppose it would be easier to achieve EPA in the EB if I had a light 2WD model. It just seems that gas mileage in the EB gets hit hard whenever asked to perform more.
That's the nature of a turbo engine. If you keep it out of boost it's fine. It's when you watch the boost gauge start lighting up that your mileage drops in it. The EB is capable of slightly better fuel economy than the V8, but the problem with it is that the EB trucks are too much fun to drive. You put your foot in them and it's tough to keep it from working the turbos. The 2.7L trucks are a bit better there, but again they suffer somewhat from the same problem.

Originally Posted by Wiggums
Anyways, I don't expect a lot of changes for the 2017 model except for the 10-speed transmission and the new Ecoboost V6. I wouldn't hold my breath though.
Ford's already basically said in the 3.5L EB GenII announcement that the trucks would largely be carry overs from the previous year aside from those changes. I do know there is a new "white gold" color coming for them. That's been spotted and I believe you can see that on the order guide.
 
  #25  
Old 08-07-2016, 07:54 PM
Wiggums's Avatar
Wiggums
Wiggums is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,306
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
10-speed's only in the EB 3.5, right? Or all? I heard conflicting reports.
 
  #26  
Old 08-07-2016, 08:06 PM
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
srb1194 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Only the Ecoboost. If you want the 10 speed then you're getting the Ecoboost.
 
  #27  
Old 08-08-2016, 12:31 AM
brokenleg's Avatar
brokenleg
brokenleg is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,493
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
For the way I drive the 3.31s will do better on gas than either 3.55s or 3.73s. (I have a 2013, 6.2, 373s. Best Ive done with it was 15. I average 14. which is very good)
 
  #28  
Old 08-08-2016, 05:01 AM
tseekins's Avatar
tseekins
tseekins is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maine, Virginia
Posts: 38,156
Received 1,221 Likes on 803 Posts
WRT floor covering materials, I'd love to see Ford offer the premium vinyl as an alternate to carpeting as they will in the 2017 Superduty trucks. Instead, you have to downgrade your package to get the standard grade vinyl.
 
  #29  
Old 08-08-2016, 05:05 AM
srb1194's Avatar
srb1194
srb1194 is offline
Tuned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That would be great. I remember washing out the floors in my '94. Sure was easier.
 
  #30  
Old 08-08-2016, 05:47 AM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,402
Received 804 Likes on 589 Posts
What makes it premium?
 


Quick Reply: What changes for the 2017 f150



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 AM.