1999 to 2016 Super Duty 1999 to 2016 Ford F250, F350, F450 and F550 Super Duty with diesel V8 and gas V8 and V10 engines
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

keep my 6.8 or get 6.2 or 6.7?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 03-01-2016, 11:38 AM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by buickbuggy
My wife drives the truck sometimes and is getting tired of having to manually unlock all of the doors for our 3 kids, and likes to put the windows down when it warms up (so do i) which is hard when you can't reach them to crank them down. I found a 2011 6.7 lariat with 162k miles on it but i'm unsure how the reliability has been on them. It really comes down to whether my 6.8 will outlast the 6.7, and I honestly don't know.
Put on power locks and windows. It will take some parts sourcing but it is not a massive undertaking.
 
  #17  
Old 03-01-2016, 12:27 PM
MDSuperDuty's Avatar
MDSuperDuty
MDSuperDuty is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,991
Received 49 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by buickbuggy
I currently have a 2008 f250 cc,lb,XL with 162k miles and manual windows, locks, and mirrors. I'm looking at other trucks and have found a couple 2011/2012 f250/350's with 6.2 and 100-130k miles, or with 6.7 and 175-19k miles, all XLT cc some sb some lb. I'm wondering if anyone has any advice on whether to go with the higher mile diesel, lower mile 6.2, or keep my 6.8? I tow around 11k lb trailer 6-8 times a year (once around 900 miles, others 200-400).
Vurt-da-Furk?

Why would you pick up an out of warranty truck you really will know nothing about? I'm not trying to be mean but if your truck is running fine why are you looking to move it?

Like others have said you can put the creature comforts in place if that's the issue.

Start saving some cash and buy a lower mileage unit in a few more years. The initial price tag of a high mile used truck may be inviting but you may end up paying up in the future due to repairs and maintenance. Or you may not. No one can know.

If you had listed trucks in the 30-50k/mi range I'd say go take a look!

My thoughts/opinions? That's a bad move. But that's me.

Whatever you do just take your time and evaluate it all. Make sure it's really a good move.

Good luck!
 
  #18  
Old 03-01-2016, 02:40 PM
nards444's Avatar
nards444
nards444 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MDSuperDuty
Vurt-da-Furk?

Why would you pick up an out of warranty truck you really will know nothing about? I'm not trying to be mean but if your truck is running fine why are you looking to move it?

Like others have said you can put the creature comforts in place if that's the issue.

Start saving some cash and buy a lower mileage unit in a few more years. The initial price tag of a high mile used truck may be inviting but you may end up paying up in the future due to repairs and maintenance. Or you may not. No one can know.

If you had listed trucks in the 30-50k/mi range I'd say go take a look!

My thoughts/opinions? That's a bad move. But that's me.

Whatever you do just take your time and evaluate it all. Make sure it's really a good move.

Good luck!
dad always said its better to keep your own junk vs getting somebody elses, because it will end up costing you. Better of savings your money and getting something newer he said
 
  #19  
Old 03-01-2016, 03:07 PM
buickbuggy's Avatar
buickbuggy
buickbuggy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eagle Mountain,UT
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I appreciate the advise. I wish I could just find a donor vehicle to swap the doors off of and the necessary wiring/modules. I'll keep looking and see if something with lower miles pops up, or a donor vehicle. I did find a 6.2 with 95k miles on it that I thought about checking out but wonder if i'd be disappointed in it vs the 6.8.
 
  #20  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:36 PM
buickbuggy's Avatar
buickbuggy
buickbuggy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eagle Mountain,UT
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I found a 2012 cc,lb 6.7 with 130k or 2011 with 101k, for about the same price. Is it worth the extra miles to not have the first year bugs?
 
  #21  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:40 PM
buickbuggy's Avatar
buickbuggy
buickbuggy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eagle Mountain,UT
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I bought my current truck with over 130k on it, so don't think the miles are to bad as long as there are some maintenance records. My in-laws own an auto shop too, so if there are smaller things that need done it's ok, as long as the big stuff holds up. They're not a diesel shop though, so the reliability of the engine is my biggest concern.
 
  #22  
Old 03-01-2016, 07:54 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,824
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by buickbuggy
I appreciate the advise. I wish I could just find a donor vehicle to swap the doors off of and the necessary wiring/modules. I'll keep looking and see if something with lower miles pops up, or a donor vehicle. I did find a 6.2 with 95k miles on it that I thought about checking out but wonder if i'd be disappointed in it vs the 6.8.
The 6.2 is not a down grade from a 6.8. For purely towing, some prefer the 6.8 but not all.
 
  #23  
Old 03-01-2016, 08:47 PM
MDSuperDuty's Avatar
MDSuperDuty
MDSuperDuty is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,991
Received 49 Likes on 17 Posts
Why do you want to get rid of the current truck?
 
  #24  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:17 PM
buickbuggy's Avatar
buickbuggy
buickbuggy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Eagle Mountain,UT
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I made the mistake of driving a 6.7 a few years ago and have wanted 1 ever since. I also wouldn't mind the increased gas mileage and towing capacity of the diesel. I've looked at other toy haulers and the weight could be over the capacity of my current setup and a newer diesel will get me another couple thousand lbs of towing capacity
 
  #25  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:41 PM
dualwheels66's Avatar
dualwheels66
dualwheels66 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I had a 08 v10 and traded it in on a 13 6.2, that was the worse thing I ever did. I should have kept the v10. The 6.2 for me was a waste of time and should not be in a super duty. I only owned it for 10 months, I just hated it. I now have a 6.7 and really like it but I miss the simplicity of the v10. I am shopping around for a cab and chassis v10 to replace my 6.7.
 
  #26  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:51 PM
RainDesert's Avatar
RainDesert
RainDesert is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Boise
Posts: 2,824
Received 34 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by dualwheels66
I had a 08 v10 and traded it in on a 13 6.2, that was the worse thing I ever did. I should have kept the v10. The 6.2 for me was a waste of time and should not be in a super duty. I only owned it for 10 months, I just hated it. I now have a 6.7 and really like it but I miss the simplicity of the v10. I am shopping around for a cab and chassis v10 to replace my 6.7.
I'm curious to your minority report details for hatred of the 6.2.
 
  #27  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:57 PM
dualwheels66's Avatar
dualwheels66
dualwheels66 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's simple, lack of torque.
 
  #28  
Old 03-01-2016, 09:59 PM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by dualwheels66
I had a 08 v10 and traded it in on a 13 6.2, that was the worse thing I ever did. I should have kept the v10. The 6.2 for me was a waste of time and should not be in a super duty. I only owned it for 10 months, I just hated it. I now have a 6.7 and really like it but I miss the simplicity of the v10. I am shopping around for a cab and chassis v10 to replace my 6.7.
Lmao seems like you never gave the 6.2 a chance. 385hp and 405tq doesn't belong in a super duty? I guess neither does a v10 that makes less power and a little bit more tq.
 
  #29  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:02 PM
dualwheels66's Avatar
dualwheels66
dualwheels66 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,402
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm not the only one that has noticed that the 6.2 needs to rev to make any kind of power. I hated the constant need for the engine to be spinning way up there to make power. It's been mentioned by others but they just deal with it because thats what ford offers in the Super duty line.
 
  #30  
Old 03-01-2016, 10:04 PM
Strokin-A-2010's Avatar
Strokin-A-2010
Strokin-A-2010 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by dualwheels66
I'm not the only one that has noticed that the 6.2 needs to rev to make any kind of power. I hated the constant need for the engine to be spinning way up there to make power. It's been mentioned by others but they just deal with it because thats what ford offers in the Super duty line.
You have to do that with any Ford modular engine.
 


Quick Reply: keep my 6.8 or get 6.2 or 6.7?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.