First 2017 Super duty pic?
#151
#152
#153
I think you're right. However, it seems like whenever Ford announces some change that will bring about "increased fuel economy"....it translates into BS in real life....take the 2015 upgrades for example...not only did they fail to deliver better economy, they actually made it worse.
CARB Loses Court Ruling Over Safety Concerns of Truck & Bus Regulation - PR MediaRelease
#154
EPA Anti-engineering and Crony Capitalism!
Back in like 2008 the manufacturers dropped their suit against the EPA and CARB. Why? Increased revenue due to extra maintenance and repair cost. Oil companies agreed to drop it cause what oil company doesn't want to sell more fuel. It's a joke that they are allowing anti-science cults to reverse engineer our resources creating $Billion$ in wasted resources and materials.
They can create all of the Green we make our interiors out of vegetable propaganda videos they want. What idiot use a food source for materials?
I have a 1983 Ford Ranger Diesel that gets 39 Mpg. That's 30 years ago!
Modern manufacturers are little more than hustling people for every last penny.
Yes I can afford all the cameras and whistles that cool, but over 50% of people once it's out of warranty won't be able to afford to repair the transmission. With the level of 3rd World Labor we are importing the engineers and marketing bunch have forgotten that wages are stagnated and people can't afford the $50k cars they are buying.
Sooner or later markets are going to break the system. Nothing about our current markets says sustainability or conservation.
Back in like 2008 the manufacturers dropped their suit against the EPA and CARB. Why? Increased revenue due to extra maintenance and repair cost. Oil companies agreed to drop it cause what oil company doesn't want to sell more fuel. It's a joke that they are allowing anti-science cults to reverse engineer our resources creating $Billion$ in wasted resources and materials.
They can create all of the Green we make our interiors out of vegetable propaganda videos they want. What idiot use a food source for materials?
I have a 1983 Ford Ranger Diesel that gets 39 Mpg. That's 30 years ago!
Modern manufacturers are little more than hustling people for every last penny.
Yes I can afford all the cameras and whistles that cool, but over 50% of people once it's out of warranty won't be able to afford to repair the transmission. With the level of 3rd World Labor we are importing the engineers and marketing bunch have forgotten that wages are stagnated and people can't afford the $50k cars they are buying.
Sooner or later markets are going to break the system. Nothing about our current markets says sustainability or conservation.
1.) I knew this would morph into the best thread on the entire forum soon as we got to see the 2017 SD.
2.) This guy needs to run for president.
Great post.
-Ej-
#155
This was on Fox News, "The supers will be offered with a choice of a 6.7-liter turbo diesel, 6.8-liter gasoline V10, or 6.2-liter gasoline V8. Ford has not yet revealed any power outputs, payload and towing capacities, but says they will all be “more” than the trucks they replace."
Does that mean the V10 will be in the F250?
Does that mean the V10 will be in the F250?
#156
This was on Fox News, "The supers will be offered with a choice of a 6.7-liter turbo diesel, 6.8-liter gasoline V10, or 6.2-liter gasoline V8. Ford has not yet revealed any power outputs, payload and towing capacities, but says they will all be “more” than the trucks they replace."
Does that mean the V10 will be in the F250?
Does that mean the V10 will be in the F250?
No. The V10, since 2011, has been available in the chassis cab trucks only. This will stay the same.
#158
#159
#160
At least you would have an option. Now if you get the PS you get a too small tank and no option. I'm hoping Ford figures out a way the have a full sized tank. It looks like the pollution stuff takes up all the room now.
#161
Exactly. When I'm towing my RV, which can weigh up to 19k depending on loading of the garage, I can't make it two hours on the highway without needing to refuel. The short bed tanks are very anemic.
It would seem though, that Ford is implementing many popular aftermarket upgrades. Trailer TPMS. Trailer back up cam. Power folding steps like the AMP units. Maybe they will add a larger OEM tank like the Titan or Transferflow.
It would seem though, that Ford is implementing many popular aftermarket upgrades. Trailer TPMS. Trailer back up cam. Power folding steps like the AMP units. Maybe they will add a larger OEM tank like the Titan or Transferflow.
#162
#163
#164
Yesterday's MotorTrend broadcast awesome! A year can't pass soon enough! Just in case you missed it, here's a nice summary of the announcement [with photos], if interested: Ford Finally Reveals the New 2017 Ford F-Series Super Duty Pickup | The Ford Experiment
#165
Yeah, with a diesel you can cut the vent tube and the old "28 gal" tank magically holds 32 gallons instantly. I can get almost 600 miles a tank out of my short bed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hammerhead90
6.7L Power Stroke Diesel
6
10-04-2010 09:24 PM