Cadalitic converter
#1
#2
#4
#5
#6
I don't know if it's possible on the F150, but it IS possible on some other vehicles. The Nissan 2.5 found in Sentras and some other Nissan vehicles are notorious for this. There's a cat right on the exhaust manifold. The material breaks apart, gets sucked back into the engine, it scores the cylinder walls. The engine starts consuming oil, and if the scoring gets bad enough, it loses compression.
Does the F150 have cats right on or near the manifolds?
Does the F150 have cats right on or near the manifolds?
#7
@ exranger06
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
Last edited by F150Torqued; 02-17-2015 at 07:01 PM. Reason: JUST NOTICED
Trending Topics
#8
@ exranger06
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
#9
#10
I did some searching to find out the specifics on the Nissan 2.5. These cars apparently don't have an EGR valve. Instead of using a valve, Nissan purposely engineered the car to have some valve overlap so that some exhaust gases would get sucked back in (through the exhaust valve) on the intake stroke, which basically emulates an EGR system. Which explains how it overcomes gravity and the flow of exhaust out the tailpipe. Nissan actually issued a recall for this catalytic problem.
Official pre-cat recall 02-04 qr25 equipped cars - Nissan Sentra Forum - B15, B16 and B17 Sentra Forums
ON SOME 2002-2003 ALTIMA VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH THE 2.5 LITER ENGINE, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THE EXHAUST PIPE HANGER PIN MAY CATCH DEBRIS FROM THE ROAD THAT COULD BE IGNITED BY CONTACT WITH THE CATALYTIC CONVERTER AND CAUSE A FIRE. IN ADDITION, ON BOTH THE 2002-2003 ALTIMA AND THE 2002-2004 SENTRA EQUIPPED WITH THE 2.5 LITER ENGINE, THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT CERTAIN ENGINE OPERATING CONDITIONS MAY CAUSE DAMAGE TO THE PRE-CATALYST. MATERIAL FROM INSIDE A DAMAGED PRE-CATALYST COULD ENTER THE ENGINE AND RESULT IN INCREASED OIL CONSUMPTION. IF THE ENGINE OIL LEVEL IS NOT CHECKED ON A PERIODIC BASIS AND DROPS BELOW THE LOW LEVEL, AND THE DRIVER CONTINUES TO OPERATE THE VEHICLE IGNORING
NOTICEABLE ENGINE NOISE, ENGINE DAMAGE MAY OCCUR WHICH COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
NOTICEABLE ENGINE NOISE, ENGINE DAMAGE MAY OCCUR WHICH COULD RESULT IN A FIRE.
#11
#12
@ exranger06
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
I don't care "WHERE" the cat converters are physically located - they have to be in the "EXHAUST". For crap from them to be "SUCKED" back into the engine - you've got a lot more problems than just cat converters!!!!!! I supposed if the "EXHAUST" valves were acting as "INTAKE" valves, then perhaps you need a new "INTAKE" filter installed!!!!!
I just "NOTICED" the spelling ----. That's what you need. A Cadillac converter!!!!
I was trying to get information that might help me, not a spelling lesson (catalytic converter) from some SMART ***.
#14
Exranger06 don't feel bad. I've went round and round with people on forums only to have them later pass on the advice they told me was wrong. I just nod and smile.
The 5.4 3 valve also uses valve overlap instead of an EGR system. I don't think it is something that would be very likely to happen but not completely impossible. I would be more concerned about the broken pieces blocking exhaust flow. That will cause serious driveability issues.
The 5.4 3 valve also uses valve overlap instead of an EGR system. I don't think it is something that would be very likely to happen but not completely impossible. I would be more concerned about the broken pieces blocking exhaust flow. That will cause serious driveability issues.
#15
Good reply for Spelling Criticisms
glrbird
I was just 'funnin' you with my spelling comment. I apologize if unintended offense was taken. I'm not that good a speller myself and the joke wasn't even my original. When the dealership told my wife her Buick needed a catylitic converter she actually said to him she "didn't even know it had a cadillac converter - what did she have to do?
It took forever to find this old email that I received back in 2007 that I remembered as perfect in this situation. I received an reply poking fun at a misspelled word in my email, and thinking I was clever when I spotted a misspelled word in HIS REPLY - I gave him a quick jab back. His response was "priceless" and I never forgot it.
You can use it on the next A*#@&hole that takes issue with your spelling.
HE SENT BACK ONLY THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE:
--------------
"On a positive note about my spelling, I found that if I would just learn how to correctly spell all words of three letters or less, AND if I learned the first and last letter of all bigger words (more than three), then I would be able to get thorugh lfie just fnie. I culod eevn ecxel at smoe tnhigs. Tihs is bcuseae of the phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. I leraned bcak at Cmabridge Uinervtisy taht the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? And I aw lyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! Not so, unlses you are a splelnig tecaehr or soemtihng lkie taht. Srmat poelpe can raed this and aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht tehy are rdanieg. You see, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and all jmubled up and you can sitll raed it wouthit any porbelm. So, I try to use olny 3 or less if I can, and ohteriswe I awlyas try to get the 1st and lsat letetr in the rghit sopt. Then its not eevr a porbelm. But I aslo hvae to be caerful aoubt my dsylxiea, or poeple mghit tihnk I'm a fumduck."
---------------
Best Wishes, F150Torqued
I was just 'funnin' you with my spelling comment. I apologize if unintended offense was taken. I'm not that good a speller myself and the joke wasn't even my original. When the dealership told my wife her Buick needed a catylitic converter she actually said to him she "didn't even know it had a cadillac converter - what did she have to do?
It took forever to find this old email that I received back in 2007 that I remembered as perfect in this situation. I received an reply poking fun at a misspelled word in my email, and thinking I was clever when I spotted a misspelled word in HIS REPLY - I gave him a quick jab back. His response was "priceless" and I never forgot it.
You can use it on the next A*#@&hole that takes issue with your spelling.
HE SENT BACK ONLY THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE:
--------------
"On a positive note about my spelling, I found that if I would just learn how to correctly spell all words of three letters or less, AND if I learned the first and last letter of all bigger words (more than three), then I would be able to get thorugh lfie just fnie. I culod eevn ecxel at smoe tnhigs. Tihs is bcuseae of the phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid. I leraned bcak at Cmabridge Uinervtisy taht the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? And I aw lyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! Not so, unlses you are a splelnig tecaehr or soemtihng lkie taht. Srmat poelpe can raed this and aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht tehy are rdanieg. You see, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and all jmubled up and you can sitll raed it wouthit any porbelm. So, I try to use olny 3 or less if I can, and ohteriswe I awlyas try to get the 1st and lsat letetr in the rghit sopt. Then its not eevr a porbelm. But I aslo hvae to be caerful aoubt my dsylxiea, or poeple mghit tihnk I'm a fumduck."
---------------
Best Wishes, F150Torqued