Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Really *ugly* emissions results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 12-02-2014, 10:02 PM
feeniks4.9's Avatar
feeniks4.9
feeniks4.9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix-or-thereabout
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rla2005
I should have been a bit more explicit. Ford started to transition to 3 digit codes in 1991. Trucks w/E4ODs were the first to use them. Manual transmission trucks started later.
I have the 5-speed, date on the door is 06/91 - these days the next year models are already on the lot by that time, so who knows where June was in the production series for the '91. *Well*, I imagine someone knows, but I don't. Anyhoo, I plug the code reader in, it gives me a three-digit code, I replace the whatsit that needs replacing according to the three-digit code, that pesky check-engine light goes off, truck runs a little less stupider than it did when the check engine light was on.
 
  #17  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:14 PM
feeniks4.9's Avatar
feeniks4.9
feeniks4.9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix-or-thereabout
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Truck passed emissions today - as the saying goes - with flying colors. The usual low numbers I had always come to expect from this truck. Yeah.

The moral to the story? Let me sum up with a cautionary tale I first remember hearing in my yoot:

For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
All for the want of a nail.




 
  #18  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:24 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,930
Likes: 0
Received 967 Likes on 765 Posts
So what did you replace this time to get it to pass?
 
  #19  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:33 PM
Steve Lawrence's Avatar
Steve Lawrence
Steve Lawrence is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Simi Valley
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pro'lly the thing in the picture

Originally Posted by Conanski
So what did you replace this time to get it to pass?
So...what did you replace this time to get it to pass?
 
  #20  
Old 12-09-2014, 07:35 PM
feeniks4.9's Avatar
feeniks4.9
feeniks4.9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Phoenix-or-thereabout
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coolant temperature sensor. Eventually threw in the towel and found a great little shop where the guy hooked up everything he had to it - I was right within spec on everything, but hello the CTS stayed a nice frosty 87* the whole time. Part of me knew it, too - but I was done throwing parts at it. I paid the man, hit the O'Reillys on the way home, switched it out in the parking lot at work in less than 15 minutes. It was a whole new truck.

Numbers went from four times the standard to less than 1/4 the standard.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-gearhead88
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
09-14-2012 12:27 PM
howman442
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
04-17-2005 05:31 AM
el conquistador
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
18
09-17-2004 10:15 PM
brannma
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
09-07-2003 11:42 PM
SBV1
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
2
09-19-2001 12:10 AM



Quick Reply: Really *ugly* emissions results



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.