1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

89 2.9L Failed Emissions **Solved**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-15-2014, 10:40 AM
2trux's Avatar
2trux
2trux is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
89 2.9L Failed Emissions **Solved**

Hi all, I just bought this truck and failed the CO part of the emissions test. The high speed CO barely passed and the idle CO was about 4 times the max allowed.
Before taking it in I replaced the TPS (fixed the CEL on), and the PCV.

Since failing the test I have replaced the spark plugs, plug wires, cap, & rotor. It has a K&N filter that is clean.
When I pull the cable off the IAC the engine dies, when I pull the vacuum off the MAP the engine dies, & removing the cable from the air charge sensor in the manifold causes the RPM to drop. I won't say these are definitive tests but they indicate the sensors do something and are not completely failed.

The truck probably has a bajillion miles on it and the lifters rattle crazy loud but there is no smoke and the engine seems to run good.

Any help on what to check next would be appreciated.
 
  #2  
Old 10-15-2014, 10:44 PM
dvlsmstr's Avatar
dvlsmstr
dvlsmstr is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: May 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rings due to the bajillion miles would be my guess.
 
  #3  
Old 10-16-2014, 07:36 AM
tomw's Avatar
tomw
tomw is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 4,852
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts
Running with too much fuel ups the HC output, but CO means there wasn't enough combustion going on, more fuel by a bit than was able to burn.
Check your fuel pressure & regulator function. Check that the thermostat is closing. Do you get a good high idle when first starting the engine? If not, the computer likely doesn't know the coolant temperature. The CTS -coolant temp sensor- may not be functional.

Failure at high speed would make me think an overall problem exists that is shared by all cylinders, so be sure to check the fuel pressure. I think you have replaced the proper parts so far, but check that there is not excessive fuel diluted into the oil in the crankcase. Pull the dipstick and take a whiff, and if it is odiferous, do an oil change also.
Take it on a 10 mile run out of town and back on a good highway, and then show up at the test facility.
tom
 
  #4  
Old 10-16-2014, 07:40 AM
2trux's Avatar
2trux
2trux is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well it turns out it was the HC levels that were too high.
After replacing the tune up parts I went and bought a timing light. (Can you imagine?) The timing was way advanced so I dropped it down to +6 degrees. Took it down for a retest and dropped HC from 697 to 81 at idle. I passed the test and am overjoyed.

Edit: I did put the timing back to +10 when I got back home.
 
  #5  
Old 10-16-2014, 07:44 AM
David7.3's Avatar
David7.3
David7.3 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Oakhust NJ Jersey Shore
Posts: 3,208
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Low compression could cause high CO counts, like dvlsmstr has said, do a squeeze test and make sure what you got is worth dumping the money in, if all else fails force a common vacuum leak and that will lower your CO. Just a small one, not enough to cause a miss or a high idle.
 
  #6  
Old 10-24-2014, 12:07 PM
john72ss's Avatar
john72ss
john72ss is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southwest washington (th
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
I have a 88 with the same engine, twice it failed about 10 years apart, both times it was the burned out o2 sensor!
 
  #7  
Old 10-25-2014, 12:23 AM
KF4EYR's Avatar
KF4EYR
KF4EYR is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: florida
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here in florida, when they did have emmision testing in hillsboro county the main reason so many people would fail a test is they would not admit how many miles were on their car,,,,if it is 15 years old it in all reality should have 150000 miles but when they bring it to test they tell the testers 50000,,,,,i had a 89 chevette at the time ,the engine was set up like a 80 model,,, the catalythic converter was gutted in such a way that they couldnt tell that it was,,when pull up to test told them 300000 plus miles it nevered failed..... i am glad they stopped testing when they figured out the government wasnt making money and too many people figured out how to cheat the test.......
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
groundrat
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
04-09-2019 03:20 PM
nmgonzo
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
3
07-22-2010 02:21 AM
ehoepp
Aerostar
11
01-24-2005 07:27 AM
20terminator03
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
4
07-27-2004 01:43 PM
dbuck50
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
11-24-2003 12:05 PM



Quick Reply: 89 2.9L Failed Emissions **Solved**



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:33 PM.