Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 1997 - 2003 F150
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?


1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage SPONSORED BY:

Welcome to Ford-Trucks Forums!
Welcome to Ford-Trucks.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Ford-Trucks Forums community today!





 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-03-2014, 02:52 PM
73fan's Avatar
73fan 73fan is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 345
73fan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Water Methanol Injection

Just out of curiosity, is anyone running water methanol injection in their 5.4L or 4.6? Or you know someone that does?

Sent from Nexus 4. IB AutoGroup
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-04-2014, 09:38 AM
Bluegrass 7 Bluegrass 7 is online now
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,749
Bluegrass 7 has a good reputation on FTE.Bluegrass 7 has a good reputation on FTE.
I waited awhile for some replies before answering.
.
There is no benefit to doing any kind of external fuel additions on a computer controlled engine.
The system is an original design with program that has been worked out by engineering and test.
The system runs on feedback from sensors to keep the operating conditions within tables of values, in program.
Any effects of external additions to the airflow is sensed by the OX sensors such that corrections are made to fuel injection to "counter' the effects of this additions in the mixture.
The same can be said for an additive to absorb water in the gas.
It is alcohol based same as Methanol such that while absorbing water it leans the mixture.
The Ox sensors detect the extra oxygen produced from the Methanol just after combustion and in return, the signal adds more fuel by injection, causing a loss to normal fuel mileage.
If this were to go to extremes, a code 171/174 could result. The same condition has been reported with the use of 'high concentrations' of Ethanol in gas formulations used in non flex engine control systems.
It moves the 'fuel tables' out of limit causing the codes to set as a normal system response.
Additionally, adding an alcohol into the air stream between the air filter and mass air lowers the temperature of the air stream. This might be perceived as an increase in torque from the motor but you pay for it in terms of using extra fuel for a number of reasons. Those reasons are the intake air sensor detects the lowered temperature and causes added fuel much the same as the OX sensor will do detecting the extra oxygen, so you can get a double hit for it in terms of extra fuel consunption.
As another effect, the mass air meter is cooled and results in a change of transfer function signal. The reason is the air meter is a hot wire bridge and is cooled to excess by the presence of the alcohol in the air stream.
.
You can see from above:
If the control system were altered, sensor hardware design changed and engine compression raised, it could then be of benefit.
.
The flex fuel engine systems are altered for this extended fuel use by system programming change and hardware changes that are able to detect these changes in fuel as they are passing through the system..
These examples are the basis for not realizing any benefits to the efforts in a stock non flex fuel control system.
.
The question of additives and devices was just asked in my local newspaper but the correct and best answers are never given the public such that the question just keeps being in float since the explanations why are never offered. I assume this is why the question appears in these forums, as well.
Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2014, 01:56 AM
73fan's Avatar
73fan 73fan is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Alberta
Posts: 345
73fan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Thanks the for the very thorough explanation! Makes perfect sense!

Oh, and if anyone is using this in your truck, I'd still like to hear from you.

Sent from Nexus 4. IB AutoGroup
Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2014, 01:56 AM
Reply

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Newer Light Duty Trucks > 1997 - 2003 F150

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.2 ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.
Advertising - Terms of Use - Privacy Statement - Jobs
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company.

vbulletin Admin Backup