What do you want to see on the 2016 truck?
#136
#137
I disagree 1000% about more electronics. My trucks have spent more time at the dealership due to electronics then anything. We need much less electronics and get back to actually paying attention to the road and the cars around us then relying on a sensor to tell you how to drive.
My '05 excursion has just the right amount of useful electronics for me.
#138
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: North Central Washington
Posts: 17,673
Received 3,566 Likes
on
1,425 Posts
I ran out of time and didn't get to read the whole threat, so sorry if I duplicate some things.
I kind of like the finders.
Yes
I second this.
I agree
Good idea.
Here's one I would like to see. Three programmable buttons for the cruse control. So you could set three speeds something like 40 MPH, 50 MPH and 65 MPH.
Yes
LED bed lights that come on with tail gate, electronic tail gate lock that locks with door locks, full opening rear window, factory bed spray in liner, plug in for an addition rear camera that could be mounted on a trailer, better anti-theft security system and get rid of the colour white
Here's one I would like to see. Three programmable buttons for the cruse control. So you could set three speeds something like 40 MPH, 50 MPH and 65 MPH.
#139
#141
#142
Instead of accelerating to a desired speed and then activating the cruise control, on the Mercedes you set the desired speed on the dash display (say 90 KPH) then activated your cruise control at any speed. Using a small lever under the turn signal lever, you could change the set speed on the fly, say slow to 50KPH as you entered a town. If you moved the lever all the way up or down (through a soft click) you changed the desired speed up or down by 5 KPH. A small movement of the lever up or down (to the soft click but not through it) changed the desired speed by 1 KPH.
Once you got familiar with the operation it was pretty cool, especially since I was warned by the locals that speeding of any form was not tolerated and the tickets were "very expensive". If the speed limit was 100 KPH, you just set the cruise control at that speed and activated it.
#143
Even if the chances of it crushing like that slim, I think we can all agree that any improvement that makes it safer would be a good thing. There is obviously room for improvement here. Hopefully Ford took some of that safety technology it had from owning Volvo and is applying it to new vehicles. Combine that with the off-road technology from Land Rover and its traditional American muscle, I'd say it would be a pretty good combination.
#144
#145
This has probably been mentioned already, but I didn't read back threw all the pages of this thread.
But I want to see Ford make a true competitor to the Power Wagon. F-250 with an up-tuned 6.2L V8 making 450ish-hp or so super low geared T-Case with a 4.30 rear end, front and rear lockers and factory 35inch tires, factory winch and all that stuff.
Ford could really steal some sells from Dodge if they would offer their truck with an optional 6.7L Diesel as well. Seeing as Dodge doesn't offer the Power Wagon with their own 6.7L Cummins.
But I want to see Ford make a true competitor to the Power Wagon. F-250 with an up-tuned 6.2L V8 making 450ish-hp or so super low geared T-Case with a 4.30 rear end, front and rear lockers and factory 35inch tires, factory winch and all that stuff.
Ford could really steal some sells from Dodge if they would offer their truck with an optional 6.7L Diesel as well. Seeing as Dodge doesn't offer the Power Wagon with their own 6.7L Cummins.
#147
True, my wife's SUV (Range Rover Sport) has a Ford derived 5.0L engine (even has FoMoCo) stamped in the oil filter canister (doesn't have a spin on filter). Also, look at Ford's version of the Terrain Response system in the new generation Explorer, it's Land Rover derived, or a very good copy. Also the I-4 Turbo Charged engine in the Range Rover Evoque is a Ford design.
#148
True, my wife's SUV (Range Rover Sport) has a Ford derived 5.0L engine (even has FoMoCo) stamped in the oil filter canister (doesn't have a spin on filter). Also, look at Ford's version of the Terrain Response system in the new generation Explorer, it's Land Rover derived, or a very good copy. Also the I-4 Turbo Charged engine in the Range Rover Evoque is a Ford design.
#149
I'm actually very impressed with the 5.0L in my wife's RRS, it's very quick, we didn't opt for the SC version (I wanted one.....bad) but the naturally aspirated one we have is extremely fast, for what it is. It's 375 HP, not completely sure about the Trq. though. The SC version is 510 HP (it's a beast!)