1997-2006 Expedition & Navigator 1997 - 2002 and 2003 - 2006 Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator Discussion

'98 Expedition "System Too Lean", P0171, P0174

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #106  
Old 01-18-2011, 07:09 PM
dan4147's Avatar
dan4147
dan4147 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: TN Foothills
Posts: 53
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gumbel
Looking at my last few posts in this forum you'll see I've been chasing a vacuum leak on a 2000 Expedition 5.4. I gave up and paid the dealer to diagnose it and they came up with the intake manifold gasket. I decided to have the dealer do it since I didn't want to risk doing all that work and still having a manifold leak. Last week they told me the gasket kit had arrived and I could drop off the truck. I did that Wednesday evening. Thursday they called to say that they had ordered the wrong kit (4.6) but would have the 5.4 kit on Friday. I told them that was OK and that they could disassemble on Thursday. I guess they waited until Friday to disassemble because on Friday at 2 pm they called to tell me the intake manifold was cracked. I would have bet that was going to happen after having read some postings on those plastic manifolds but the dealer had told me that 90% of the intake manifold leaks they saw on 5.4s were from the gasket. I told them to order the manifold, which they should have on Monday. The Motorcraft intake manifold was $484 retail but they're selling it to me for $386. I'll be into this for $1100 by the time it's done. Had I do it over again, I would have attempted it myself with an aftermarket manifold (Dorman, $166 on Amazon). The gasket kit is about $75 from Ford, but I think the Dorman manifold comes with a kit (gaskets and bolts). This is the first major repair this Expedition has had in its 211,000 miles so I probably shouldn't complain (too much) if this ($1100) fixes the problem.
Way to go Gumbel. You may win the determination and documentation award. Not that it helps pay your bill, but I went thru much of the same processes !!at the DEALER!! 2 different dealers replaced much of the unecessary stuff you did (except the intake, plus dfpe sensors, solenoid, etc) until they finally found a vac leak somewhere behind the battery. I have not yet gotten over the inability to make obdII worthwhile. I believe there is more knowledge and honesty on this forum than at a dealer. So, in effect you did as good as the dealers I have, plus you have a new intake under warranty. Be proud........
 
  #107  
Old 01-18-2011, 09:54 PM
Gumbel's Avatar
Gumbel
Gumbel is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New intake manifold appears to cure vacuum leak

I picked up the Expedition today from the dealer this afternoon with its new intake manifold. Seems to be working OK. Actually it threw another code in about 5 miles, but that was because a DPFE sensor hose got kinked during the manifold install. Once that was taken care of all seems good, at least in the first 50 miles. Total turned out to be $1000. The new manifold has some improvements over the old one including a new heat shield. Mech also said the MAF was not performing well and recommended I get a new one. He had cleaned it and I had cleaned it a few weeks ago. I found a new Motorcraft MAF sensor on ebay motors for $47.50 v the $120 and up that others want. Retail is about $250 but some dealers sell at $150 plus a $75 core charge. I can't figure out why the core charge since the sensor looks like a throw-away. No core charge on the ebay MAF. Anything to help the mileage with gas at $3.10 and rising. Now to get some new rubber.... 211,800 miles and still going.

Currently
2000 EB Expedition 4WD 5.4
2005 Explorer 4WD 4.0
2005 Explorer 2WD 4.0
Previously
1958 Custom 300 352
1963 Galaxy 500 352
1987 Bronco II 4WD
and four non-Fords
 
  #108  
Old 07-23-2011, 02:29 PM
Icefan71's Avatar
Icefan71
Icefan71 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Found this thread yesterday when I got a CEL yesterday. Went to Autozone to have codes read. System too lean both banks. After reading thru all the posts, I checked for vacuum leaks and found none. Disconnected the battery and cleaned the MAF sensor with carb cleaner. Let it dry for about an hour. CEL went away and truck runs fine, but after a little while, it idles a little rough, but still drives fine and no CEL. I hope the rough idle will fix itself(?). Hopefully the CEL won't come back.
 
  #109  
Old 07-23-2011, 05:25 PM
alloro's Avatar
alloro
alloro is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 0,0,1
Posts: 23,468
Received 4,201 Likes on 2,436 Posts
Originally Posted by Icefan71
it idles a little rough, but still drives fine and no CEL.
The ECM has to relearn how to idle the engine since the battery was disconnected. Give it a day or two of normal driving and you should be fine.
 
  #110  
Old 07-23-2011, 05:54 PM
Icefan71's Avatar
Icefan71
Icefan71 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks alloro. I kinda thought thats what was going on.
 
  #111  
Old 07-23-2011, 07:41 PM
Gumbel's Avatar
Gumbel
Gumbel is offline
New User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's been six months and 8000 more miles on my 2000 Expedition since my last post about the vacuum leak. The new intake manifold is working well, which means I'll probably jinx myself with this post. No codes or problems since January. I now have 219,600 miles. All the "test by replacement" I did trying to find that vacuum leak may have prevented other problems. And since my last post we bought a 2011 Expedition for my wife and I inherited the 2000. I had such good luck with the reliability of the 2000 I decided to basically buy the same truck again. 5.4, 4WD. The EBs are gone in 2011, but they were replaced by an "XLT Premium" that is the same as an EB. Although I have always liked the way the 2000 rides, the ride on the 2011 with its independent suspension is much better. The 2000 is woefully under-braked with those small front rotors and they definitely fixed that in this 2011. I just think about braking in the 2011 and it stops. It doesn't sit as tall as the 2000, but it's definitely a nice drive.

Currently
2011 XLT Prem Expedition 4WD 5.4
2000 EB Expedition 4WD 5.4
2005 Explorer 4WD 4.0
2005 Explorer 2WD 4.0
Previously
1958 Custom 300 352
1963 Galaxy 500 352
1987 Bronco II 4WD
1995 XLT Explorer 4WD 4.0
 
  #112  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:04 PM
Icefan71's Avatar
Icefan71
Icefan71 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Icefan71
Found this thread yesterday when I got a CEL yesterday. Went to Autozone to have codes read. System too lean both banks. After reading thru all the posts, I checked for vacuum leaks and found none. Disconnected the battery and cleaned the MAF sensor with carb cleaner. Let it dry for about an hour. CEL went away and truck runs fine, but after a little while, it idles a little rough, but still drives fine and no CEL. I hope the rough idle will fix itself(?). Hopefully the CEL won't come back.
After 3 days, CEL is back. Truck still drives fine, no change in performance or gas mileage. Idle is still rough, though. I'm gonna have to go back through the vacuum hoses. I read about the intake manifold being a source of leaks, so I'll have to check that too
 
  #113  
Old 07-27-2011, 02:52 PM
Icefan71's Avatar
Icefan71
Icefan71 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Central PA
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It was the PCV elbow at the rear just below the IAC valve. It felt fine the other day when I checked it, but today I pulled the entire hose assembly off. When I started pulling on that elbow, it fell apart. I got a $10 "help" replacement at Autozone. Took it for a "drive cycle" and its all good. Drives fine, idles fine, no CEL.
 
  #114  
Old 09-09-2011, 04:39 PM
Sommerfelt6's Avatar
Sommerfelt6
Sommerfelt6 is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Phil056
Would you happen to know the part# for the assembly?

Thanks
The part number for the heated assembly through ford is XL3Z-6C324-GA
 
  #115  
Old 09-13-2011, 11:26 PM
Man_tlac83's Avatar
Man_tlac83
Man_tlac83 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Castle, Delaware
Posts: 2,020
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Reading this thread brought back memories. Of when I first got this code. I lived in Darby, PA at the time and not one Ford dealer in DE nor lower PA had the heated lines. Had to drive up to conshohocken to get it. Ended up finding some good eat spots. Thank god for a second car,lol. Good luck to anyone that has this problem in the future.


__________________
98 5.4 Eddie 4x4 176K (soon to be 75k)
88 Stang 5.0 HO (stock for now)
95 Mazda Protege Dx 1.5L Rotory 5spd 222,252 miles (wrecked - gone but not forgotten)
 
  #116  
Old 09-30-2011, 05:37 PM
rclca's Avatar
rclca
rclca is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
P0171 and P0174

Thanks guys I just had this problem. It was about 20 minuets after I filled up so I was thinking BAD FUEL. read the forum fix for the codes before I went and accused the gas station and the elbow was trashed. Less that 6 bucks and 20 minuets later it was fixed.
Thanks guys this forum is great.
 
  #117  
Old 10-10-2011, 01:42 AM
Devil Dawg's Avatar
Devil Dawg
Devil Dawg is offline
New User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
99 explorer P0171 P0174

<HR style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #d1d1e1; COLOR: #d1d1e1" SIZE=1><!-- / icon and title --><!-- message -->
Same problem, the notorious P0171 P0174. Now, I am assuming that you already checked your vacuum lines with your mouth or a vacuum brake bleeder; making sure that your lines do not have holes in them and that they can widthstand suction. If you havn't done this; do this now! While you're at it, check hoses and other hoses connected to the intake that may just have a crack or hole aka. PVC hose, OIL cap, oil cap hose and that one going underneath your battery that even the dealer can't decide what it is or isn't. If you find a hole in the line or a crack, repair it, erase the codes drive 40 miles. If the light comes on again, continue checking the hoses and move on. I want you to know how you can distinguish the problem. I myself have been quite frustrated with these codes. Infact it has taken me one year to actually buckle down and find the issue. Like most of us with these codes, I replaced parts on this like it were a lego car. While reading more on these codes. (on a KIA website) I found myself fidling with my laptop in one hand and my OBDII in the other and I found a solution. Buy, find, or rent an OBDII scanner from your local auto parts store. Ensure it has Live Data feed software in the OBDII. Plug the OBDII in while vehicle is running; go the the Live Data feed menu screen and press enter. Next, see if you can find your short term fuel trim reading it should be as close to 0.00 as possible. (Mine was flexing from -3.61 to 7.62 that's when you know you have an issue) Once you see your trim reading scroll down to it and press enter. You will see a graph pop up like something you did in math class a thousand years ago; you will notice the graph is moving up and down, thats good, that means your vehicle is running. Now, pop your hood, get a can of Carb & Choke cleaner and spray it in and around the engine bay. Making sure you get in the tight areas around the intake manifold. If you notice a large change in the short term fuel trim graph reading (mine plumited and my vehicle almost died); around a certian area where you sprayed, you've just found your problem area. Ok. So, you found your engines bad spot. Depending on where your graph changed dramatically, I'm just going to assume it is the intake plenum gasket. Funny, what manufactures are doing these days. They're bolting plastic intakes to metal manifolds. Dumb right? Plastic heats up and expands at different tempuratures than metal, the dumb dumbs. Thus resulting in a defect later down the line; in hopes that you will bring your vehicle to the dealer. So, they can rape your wallet. I got the plastic intake off, I found just underneath that, there is a fuel rail and I just took it off aswell. When I went down to my local autopart store I got, the plenum gaskets, 8 fuel injector O-rings, some COPPER silicone HIGH HEAT, and a reverse Torqs socket to fit the head of the fuel rail bolts. Putting her back together, the fuel rail bolts need to be torqued to 11LBS and the intake nutts need to be torqued to 12 LBS. Hopeing you got the hint on the COPPER HIGH HEAT silicone. After she's back together, I drove to no-where and back and no codes, she is running like a champ. I recommend doing this first before you change the Mass Air Flow sensor (MAF), Idol Air Control valve (IAC), Exhaust Gas Recirculation regulator (EGR) or the fuel pump and filter. I changed the intake plenum gaskets for around 40$ (with a military discount and an Autozone rewards card) that's a whole lot better than $1,000+ from a dealer. I hope this helps. Semper Fidelis!
 
  #118  
Old 02-24-2012, 11:44 AM
LuckyRedLV's Avatar
LuckyRedLV
LuckyRedLV is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Greetings from Vegas! and THANKS AGAIN!!!!

My girl "Bet" was not feeling well this week. I got the CEL followed by a rough idle at a stop (under power she ran pretty well). Broke out one of the best purchases at Costco ever! my ODB2 and got the 171/174 codes.

I read this forum from top to bottom and came up with a game plan. Trying the easiest first. Well, sure enough, the rear 90deg PCV boot on the manifold was blown and when I went to remove it the one on the side went as well. Popped over to Checkers and spent $17! they had a Ford replacement for the 90 but...not the side one. Looked through the ones on the rack and there was one for a Chrysler that matched....

Went back to my garage to put it in . I maneuvered the lines back where they were (they don't make this easy) and put in the new boots. Started her up .......and now she runs WORSE than before?????? Hmmmm

I reached back behind the intake manifold and realized that I put the boot over some cap? and not the actual port. I LOL'd and whent "WHEW!" put the elbow on the correct fitting and she purrs like a kitten!!


THANKS GANG!
 
  #119  
Old 02-24-2012, 12:26 PM
alloro's Avatar
alloro
alloro is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: 0,0,1
Posts: 23,468
Received 4,201 Likes on 2,436 Posts
Originally Posted by LuckyRedLV
Greetings from Vegas!

I read this forum from top to bottom and came up with a game plan.
If I lived in Vegas I could think of a lot better things to do with my time than read this forum from top to bottom!

Glad you got it fixed for so little.
 
  #120  
Old 03-08-2012, 02:07 PM
BLÕME EDITION's Avatar
BLÕME EDITION
BLÕME EDITION is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
System lean

I have a 97 expedition 5.4 Eddie I am getting system too lean on right bank only passengerside cyl 1-4 I have replaced all o2's mass air spark plugs intake gasket upper and lower all new injectors fuel filter fuel regulator PCV hose still getting codes 171-174 the truck runs perfect until it warms up then starts to miss!anyone have any ideas last thing to do is fuel pump my computer is telling me that fuel pressure should be 35 at idle and 45 on acceleration I'm at 29 idle and 39 on rev.so I unplug the vacuum line to the fuel regulator and fuel pressure goes to 40 at idle or rev so to me if it was a weak pump it wouldn't jump do to being weak any ideas at all??I did not replace the lower black plastic manifold itself but I smoked it no smoke from that area and sprayed 2 cans of brake cleaner down ther and did not pic nothing up on my computer.at a loss of further ideas!!
 


Quick Reply: '98 Expedition "System Too Lean", P0171, P0174



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.