Please remember to torque your wheels
#16
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
Proper torque on the X, 165 ft/lbs.
Over torquing could cause rotor warping. Under torquing could cause them to come off.
Not hard to crack them off with the supplied tire wrench, but yes the wife would have a hard time to change a tire on her own. That is why we are around. lol
Over torquing could cause rotor warping. Under torquing could cause them to come off.
Not hard to crack them off with the supplied tire wrench, but yes the wife would have a hard time to change a tire on her own. That is why we are around. lol
#17
I guess it depends on where you look but I've mostly heard 155 pounds and I've heard this "rotor warping" comment before but never could buy into it. How can squeezing the wheel a little tighter against the hub cause the rotor to warp? There is no lever action there, it's just more direct squeezing. Any engineers out there that can agree with me? The greatest problem with over-tightening is snapping studs off at that time or with a delayed action which hopefully isn't while going down the freeway.
My guess is that for most of us, torquing the lugs at 115# is fine. That's plenty to pull our 4 ton beasts and a light tow. 85# may be enough. But the guys that are really taxing their excursions with the 30' travel trailers (or similar weight) need to follow the specs and use Ford's recommended setting near 160. The stresses of pulling and stopping that much weight need to be transferred across the studs, not down the threads.
#20
I'm not fully educated on this but I understand our Excursions have a hub centric wheel. I did a quick check to see if the DC-2's were considered hub centric and found these footnotes in the fitment catalog, of which ** is noted in the part number for the Excursion. Are you using the Dick Cepek matched lug nuts too?
To others that know more about this stuff, could non-hub centric or the wrong lug nuts be a risk?
To others that know more about this stuff, could non-hub centric or the wrong lug nuts be a risk?
"All Dick Cepek Wheels use acorn (conical seat) lug nuts. Dick Cepek Tires & Wheels recommends duplex acorns on vehicles with GVWR of 6500lbs or greater.
Footnotes:
** = Hub centric factory recommended - wheel will be centered on lug nuts."
Footnotes:
** = Hub centric factory recommended - wheel will be centered on lug nuts."
Last edited by jasonodsky; 10-26-2011 at 03:52 PM. Reason: clarify
#22
I'm not fully educated on this but I understand our Excursions have a hub centric wheel. I did a quick check to see if the DC-2's were considered hub centric and found these footnotes in the fitment catalog, of which ** is noted in the part number for the Excursion. Are you using the Dick Cepek matched lug nuts too?
To others that know more about this stuff, could non-hub centric or the wrong lug nuts be a risk?
To others that know more about this stuff, could non-hub centric or the wrong lug nuts be a risk?
"All Dick Cepek Wheels use acorn (conical seat) lug nuts. Dick Cepek Tires & Wheels recommends duplex acorns on vehicles with GVWR of 6500lbs or greater.
Footnotes:
** = Hub centric factory recommended - wheel will be centered on lug nuts."
Footnotes:
** = Hub centric factory recommended - wheel will be centered on lug nuts."
Without acorn nuts hub centric wheels/rings should be used. Most aftermarket wheels have hub centric rings to adapt the wheel to the vehicle. Wheels that use acorn nuts use the taper on the nuts to center them and even sometimes also use hub centric.
Personally I like acorn style wheels better, the only kind of wheels I have ever had personal problems with are the hub centric wheel setups. I also notice more reported problems with the hub centric wheels from other people then the (used since forever) acorn style.
#23
85lbs is no where NEAR enough torque for an Excursion.
My F150 Lightning has torque specs of 120lbs for the lug nuts. My buddy thought it was 85lbs when he helped one day many years ago so he torqued them to 85 foot lbs. Not long after, three of the six lug nuts were discovered loose by me.
115lbs isn't enough either, for an Excursion, in my humble opinion.
Stewart
#25
Please don't do that.
85lbs is no where NEAR enough torque for an Excursion.
My F150 Lightning has torque specs of 120lbs for the lug nuts. My buddy thought it was 85lbs when he helped one day many years ago so he torqued them to 85 foot lbs. Not long after, three of the six lug nuts were discovered loose by me.
115lbs isn't enough either, for an Excursion, in my humble opinion.
Stewart
85lbs is no where NEAR enough torque for an Excursion.
My F150 Lightning has torque specs of 120lbs for the lug nuts. My buddy thought it was 85lbs when he helped one day many years ago so he torqued them to 85 foot lbs. Not long after, three of the six lug nuts were discovered loose by me.
115lbs isn't enough either, for an Excursion, in my humble opinion.
Stewart
I agree 85 is way to low. Honda cars call for 90ft/lbs of torque.
#26
Please don't do that.
85lbs is no where NEAR enough torque for an Excursion.
My F150 Lightning has torque specs of 120lbs for the lug nuts. My buddy thought it was 85lbs when he helped one day many years ago so he torqued them to 85 foot lbs. Not long after, three of the six lug nuts were discovered loose by me.
115lbs isn't enough either, for an Excursion, in my humble opinion.
Stewart
85lbs is no where NEAR enough torque for an Excursion.
My F150 Lightning has torque specs of 120lbs for the lug nuts. My buddy thought it was 85lbs when he helped one day many years ago so he torqued them to 85 foot lbs. Not long after, three of the six lug nuts were discovered loose by me.
115lbs isn't enough either, for an Excursion, in my humble opinion.
Stewart
It's strange how something that would be said in normal conversation comes out completely different when it's typed into a bulletin board. I should know better.
And as I said above, mine are at 160#.
#28
I want a full fishing report when you get back online. I'm heading to the river tomorrow.
Last edited by BassFantasizer; 10-28-2011 at 07:26 AM. Reason: It reads a lot better when one types what one is thinking is typed....
#29
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Mt. Shasta California
Posts: 11,798
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes
on
8 Posts
I just fish for "put-n-take" rainbows from the bank of Lake Siskiyou and they average about 16 inches. It was so cold this morning my rod iced up and I broke a line when fish was on but ended up with a limit of 5. (I snagged one by the top fin).