Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Battle of the Engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 05-05-2011, 10:57 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 970 Likes on 766 Posts
Originally Posted by IDIDieselJohn
I wouldn't bother with a 351, pretty useless engine if you ask me, unless you want an engine that hauls like a 302, and gets the fuel economy of a 460......
You're doing something wrong, my 5.8 was 3 seconds faster 0-60 than the current 5.0 and got 2-3 better mpg.
 
  #17  
Old 05-05-2011, 11:05 PM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 970 Likes on 766 Posts
Originally Posted by lasg4
the 302 is choked up by the heads.
Not really.. it's more the stock truck cams, with a better suited bumpstick the motor hauls really well to 5000rpm

Originally Posted by lasg4
Would you use the 351 or 302?
351 every time, it makes more TQ at 2000rm than the 5.0 makes anywhere. The stock heads certainly do become restrictive early on the 351.. like at about 4000rpm, but there are lots of options out there to fix that problem.
 
  #18  
Old 05-05-2011, 11:06 PM
Jimbo302's Avatar
Jimbo302
Jimbo302 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 678
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
lol @ swap to a 300 I-6.

Rebuild the shortblock, use a nice head cam combo and add full exhaust. It will run well with the factory intake and efi and you will add tons of torque and power.
There are other options for all out power, but that route will make a nice powerful driver without breaking the bank.
 
  #19  
Old 05-05-2011, 11:08 PM
Jimbo302's Avatar
Jimbo302
Jimbo302 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 678
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Conanski
You're doing something wrong, my 5.8 was 3 seconds faster 0-60 than the current 5.0 and got 2-3 better mpg.
I'm not sure how anyone would accurately gauge 0-60, but my 5000+lb 5.8 truck ran 10.3 1/8th mile and got 15mpg.
 
  #20  
Old 05-06-2011, 01:52 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
ColFlashman has a carbed 300.....Turns out 300 odd ponies.....GRANTED, that he has went over darn near every inch of the engine, its just the fact he has a Inline, running better hp than a 302....
 
  #21  
Old 05-06-2011, 03:27 AM
Jimbo302's Avatar
Jimbo302
Jimbo302 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 678
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
ColFlashman has a carbed 300.....Turns out 300 odd ponies.....GRANTED, that he has went over darn near every inch of the engine, its just the fact he has a Inline, running better hp than a 302....
I'm a big fan of I6's, but how is 300fwhp from a modified 4.9, "better hp than a 302"?
 
  #22  
Old 05-06-2011, 04:36 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
But the 302 is just getting started at 300HP , thats easy to do and theres so much more...Lew
 
  #23  
Old 05-06-2011, 05:01 AM
lew52's Avatar
lew52
lew52 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Conanski
You're doing something wrong, my 5.8 was 3 seconds faster 0-60 than the current 5.0 and got 2-3 better mpg.
....Thats alot of difference , i think there is something not right with your 302 , my 302 is a good 2 sec faster in the 1/4 mile than a lightning , it may be the timing curve ?? , my truck did not have alot of low end untill i had a chip burned for it , but what a difference that made , i don't think the 302 with a decent cam and heads runs very well with the stock computer settings , thats been my experiance with them....Lew
 
  #24  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:03 AM
CJM8515's Avatar
CJM8515
CJM8515 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Freehold
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Problem is and will always be where the 302 makes power, you can play with it and modify it to a degree and it helps-but it will never be a low revving torquey engine like the 300, 351 or 460. It likes rpms, nothing much you can do about it. Problem is those who drive a truck dont want it to scream usually.
 
  #25  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:41 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 970 Likes on 766 Posts
Originally Posted by lew52
....Thats alot of difference , i think there is something not right with your 302
Nothing wrong with the 302.. it makes loads of HP on the top end.. kind of surprised me actually with how well it responded to a simple cam change.. hint hint.. nudge nudge, and I did a lot of playing with the tuner to see what more I could squeeze out of it, but torque is what moves the load and the 5.8 generates more of it so the truck accelerates faster with it. This is a direct comparison of engines with literally nothing else changed, same truck, same tires, same axle gearing, same trasnmission, so it really shines the light on the differences in these engines. Certainly there are ways to make the 5.0 perform better in this vehicle.. like add more gearing, but then it's no longer a fair comparison.
 
  #26  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:54 AM
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
Conanski is online now
FTE Legend
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 30,932
Likes: 0
Received 970 Likes on 766 Posts
Originally Posted by Jimbo302
I'm a big fan of I6's, but how is 300fwhp from a modified 4.9, "better hp than a 302"?
Exactly, you can take any stock 5.0EFI truck engine and by simply swapping out the stock cam for something like the Comp XE264HR you have a 275-280hp motor.. assuming the truck has an exhaust system with headers already. Pushing it over the 300hp barrier involves a little porting or a swap to GT40 heads, and like Lew said that's just getting started thanks to the extensive aftermarket catalog these engines have.
 
  #27  
Old 05-06-2011, 09:40 AM
SideWinder4.9l's Avatar
SideWinder4.9l
SideWinder4.9l is offline
FTE Chapter Leader

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eastern Ky
Posts: 8,838
Received 20 Likes on 18 Posts
Let me rephrase....

I would love 300 hp on a I6, merely because all the power is in the lower rpm's, where it's readily available......WITHOUT having to rev like a SOB....Just my .02....But then again, I'm partial to I6's....
 
  #28  
Old 05-06-2011, 10:49 AM
punkandpissed138's Avatar
punkandpissed138
punkandpissed138 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Albany, Georgia
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im just gonna say..1969-1970s mustang trans-am stock cars used tuned 302's. sure they wre built up with boss parts and modified haha, point being. its still a 302. i love 300i6's for their reliability and towing, i love 351's for their added power over a stock 302, but i do also love my 302 in my truck. having experienced a 460 yet but plan on it. anyways...id stick with a 302 since you wouldnt have to modify the engine mounts and this way you could just build that puppy up. the 302 was based off of a 427, just miniaturized (im reading this from V8TVshow.com) so i mean,,its modeled after some power.
 
  #29  
Old 05-06-2011, 02:40 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is online now
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,878
Received 1,597 Likes on 1,302 Posts
Originally Posted by SideWinder4.9l
Let me rephrase....

I would love 300 hp on a I6, merely because all the power is in the lower rpm's, where it's readily available......WITHOUT having to rev like a SOB....Just my .02....But then again, I'm partial to I6's....
A 300 horse 300 six is going to rev to make that power. At least 4000 maybe 5000 for that hp figure.

Also, the 302 is not a small scale 427.
 
  #30  
Old 05-06-2011, 03:04 PM
im2tall33's Avatar
im2tall33
im2tall33 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Coeur d alene, Id
Posts: 23,620
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
put a 300 in it..its the best truck engine! if you want a go fast engine then by a car..just my .02 cents
 


Quick Reply: Battle of the Engines



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 PM.