Rebuilding 1947 1-ton front & rear suspension?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-26-2011, 09:26 AM
Chief-e9's Avatar
Chief-e9
Chief-e9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rebuilding 1947 1-ton front & rear suspension?

My stock suspension system (front and rear) is really sloppy thus needs to be rebuilt or replaced. It will be driven on the interstate (no more than 60 mph) as well as on secondary roads. I hope to keep it stock if possible as long as it is safe. I see a lot of discussion for 1/2 trucks but not as much for larger trucks. I'm not familiar with these type suspensions so any advice will be appreciated. Thanks in advance, Roy
 

Last edited by Chief-e9; 02-27-2011 at 09:00 AM. Reason: Clarification
  #2  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:02 PM
Fighter-of-Wars's Avatar
Fighter-of-Wars
Fighter-of-Wars is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
First, if you plan on going on the interstate, you will likely need a whole new rear axle. The gearing on the 3/4 and 1 tons was very low (high numerically) and would rarely go over 45mph. And I don't think there are new gear sets available for those axles.

But what is sloppy in you suspension? The bushings where the springs attach to the hangers? That is about the only wear point. The front is the same except for the steering components.

Really, if you replace the worn parts the original springs will do fine on the highway, as long as you make sure none are cracked or in real bad shape. A little rust is fine.

The suspension is the same principal as what is used on modern day trucks in most respects. The rear's still use leaf springs and some fronts use leaf springs. But most are coil overs. The original suspension, if in good shape, will do fine in most any application, whether it be driving around town, or on the interstate.

What is wrong with the suspension that makes you think it's sloppy?
 
  #3  
Old 02-27-2011, 09:19 AM
Chief-e9's Avatar
Chief-e9
Chief-e9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The truck now has 351W engine, A/T, P/S, and Dana rear-end. However, the front and rear suspension, as well as brake system, is still original. The truck tends to wander somewhat and has a lot of "creaks and groans", etc. You can tell by looking at the springs and rest of suspension parts that they are old and not been serviced if not ever, in a long time. Therefore, I'd like to rebuilt it entirely if worthwhile. I really don't want the expense of replacing with a newer system (for example, Mustang II suspension in the front) unless absolutely necessary since I don't drive the truck that much.
 
  #4  
Old 02-28-2011, 09:18 AM
mprsox's Avatar
mprsox
mprsox is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile 1940 suspension

hi,
I have the same situation with my 1940 one ton. I do not have all the answers, thinking about keeping all 4 wheels drums, but did add a modern power brake dual system under floor (it will mate to modern engine for manifold vac brake assist). I plan on getting a used 302 or similar with AOD trans.

It seems that one big factor is the differential ratio, believe they had 4:11 gears, so you need an overdrive to even get close to highway speeds.

As far as suspension goes, the front is more critical than rear. It has a naturally wandering suspension with the shackle designs, bump steer is a big issue. No way to fix that unless you go with a M2 setup - BUT I do have an idea.

Most parts stores sell a truck "steering stabilizer" ( one shock horizontal between both links) to keep long travel jarring to a minimum. I am going to try that solution, less than $100!!

Also another firm sells a disc brake frt conversion, about $600, but the catch is you may have to change the wheel bolt patterns too. Engineered Components, Inc. - Your One Stop Brake Shop!

keep in touch, let me know what you decide.

thanks,
mpr
 
  #5  
Old 02-28-2011, 09:55 AM
Chief-e9's Avatar
Chief-e9
Chief-e9 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mprsox: Thanks for reply. You quoted "did add a modern power brake dual system under floor". What is the system to include type master cylinder, adapter, etc.? Did you use one from another vehicle or was it all aftermarket? Does it have a booster and are you still using the stock drum brakes? Sounds like what I need. The steering stabilizer sounds like a good idea, also. I'll pm you my phone number and we can talk if you like since it sounds like we have the same project ahead. Later, Roy
 
  #6  
Old 02-28-2011, 06:35 PM
38 coupe's Avatar
38 coupe
38 coupe is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,903
Likes: 0
Received 109 Likes on 57 Posts
In my experience, a good tight front suspension and radial tires drives very well with no bump steer. No stabilizer shock needed.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
burnettd01
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
57
11-01-2015 08:39 PM
irhunter
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
08-01-2015 08:37 PM
cps
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
5
07-21-2014 06:10 PM
Chief-e9
Fifth Wheel & Gooseneck RV Towing
10
09-10-2011 09:35 PM
Chief-e9
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
7
05-21-2011 11:22 AM



Quick Reply: Rebuilding 1947 1-ton front & rear suspension?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.