2015 - 2020 F150 Discuss the 2015 - 2020 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Halo Lifts

5.0 or 3.5 ecoboost mpg with load in truck bed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 09-25-2017, 04:54 PM
forgottenben's Avatar
forgottenben
forgottenben is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
5.0 or 3.5 ecoboost mpg with load in truck bed?

We are considering one of these trucks it would normally carry about 1600 pounds in the bed. Does anyone know what they get for mileage when it's loaded down in the bed, not a trailer?
Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 09-25-2017, 05:09 PM
JKBrad's Avatar
JKBrad
JKBrad is offline
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 7,398
Received 804 Likes on 589 Posts
I'd venture to say you'll do better as far as MPG with the 5.0. The 3.5 EB will be in boost a lot more with that much weight. I haul up to about 1k lbs in the bed at least once a month. My 3.5 will drop about 3 MPG when I do that. I live in a hilly area though.

So, if performance isn't an issue, get the 5.0. That's coming from a 3.5 EB owner.
 
  #3  
Old 09-26-2017, 07:25 AM
Terryd91's Avatar
Terryd91
Terryd91 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Port huron MI
Posts: 941
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts
All depends on your right foot. If you stay out of both motors they should be close, if you get into them the 5.0 will be better.
 
  #4  
Old 09-26-2017, 07:28 AM
forgottenben's Avatar
forgottenben
forgottenben is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was probably unclear. I was considering buying whichever one I could find for a good value, I was just curious what each or either did when loaded down. I'm used to diesels, which don't honestly care what's in the truck. Bed
 
  #5  
Old 09-26-2017, 07:55 AM
seventyseven250's Avatar
seventyseven250
seventyseven250 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Calgary Canada
Posts: 8,065
Received 437 Likes on 322 Posts
Weight in the bed has little effect on mileage for steady highway driving for any motor.

I'm a huge fan of the ecoboost for its effortless power, much like a diesel. However mileage while under load is significantly worse than a diesel. Best way to think of that engine is that it can be Eco OR Boost.

It takes fuel to make all that power.
 
  #6  
Old 09-26-2017, 08:48 AM
GlueGuy's Avatar
GlueGuy
GlueGuy is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: May 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 5,365
Received 213 Likes on 179 Posts
+1 to what seventyseven says. Even when I tow a lot, it is still 5-10% of my total driving. When the EcoBoost is not towing, I typically get 21-22 MPG; especially if I'm on the freeway. When I got fuel at a mountaintop gas station a couple weeks ago, the LoM was showing 45(+) MPG until I got down into town.

When I tow our TT, it is more like 14 MPG. None-the-less, there is zero drama pulling the TT. The power feels like a diesel under these conditions.
 
  #7  
Old 09-26-2017, 09:40 AM
Mcnawsty's Avatar
Mcnawsty
Mcnawsty is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 5.0 will have better mileage loaded up. The ecoboost has to use all of its power on tap to make it go down the road loaded, so much more has spent.
 
  #8  
Old 09-26-2017, 11:25 AM
Terryd91's Avatar
Terryd91
Terryd91 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Port huron MI
Posts: 941
Received 23 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by Mcnawsty
The 5.0 will have better mileage loaded up. The ecoboost has to use all of its power on tap to make it go down the road loaded, so much more has spent.
how exactly does the EB have to use 100% power to operate? If you're not flooring it then it's only using what is requested by the pedal.
 
  #9  
Old 09-26-2017, 12:27 PM
jimmy-six's Avatar
jimmy-six
jimmy-six is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fountain Valley
Posts: 1,019
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
If you guys had a monitor showing spark advance you would see the difference between a supercharged engine and a non supercharged one. Any time you lean at all on the Eco boost its advance goes to zero or close to it. The turbos make up for it but they cause heat and additional fuel. The 5.0 does react similar but not as mich. it's all in the computor controls to save the engine. Ford is pushing Eco's like crazy. I cannot find a 5.0 Lariat on any lot so ordered one here in So Cal, actually any model for that point. A 6.5' bed must be ordered, I guess guys don't use them as pickups much. Good luck.
 
  #10  
Old 09-26-2017, 02:48 PM
onug's Avatar
onug
onug is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The difference between the two will be in the weeds. It will take the same amount of energy (fuel) to move the load down the road. Both engines, as well at the 2.7EB, will haul it just fine.
 
  #11  
Old 09-26-2017, 03:22 PM
Kingofwylietx's Avatar
Kingofwylietx
Kingofwylietx is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,631
Received 70 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by onug
The difference between the two will be in the weeds. It will take the same amount of energy (fuel) to move the load down the road. Both engines, as well at the 2.7EB, will haul it just fine.
This.


The bigger question, OP, that you might consider asking is how to option your truck. With 1600# in the bed, my F150 would already be overweight....without me even in it. My payload (driver, passengers, + all cargo) is 1564#.

Maybe you already have this worked out, if not, add it to the list of questions you need to research.
 
  #12  
Old 09-26-2017, 07:05 PM
onug's Avatar
onug
onug is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 3,274
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Kingofwylietx
The bigger question, OP, that you might consider asking is how to option your truck. With 1600# in the bed, my F150 would already be overweight....without me even in it. My payload (driver, passengers, + all cargo) is 1564#.
That’s a good point. I my CC short box had 1,500lbs remaining capacity as shipped from the factory. Maybe the HD version adds significantly more hauling capacity. I’ve gone well over the 1,500lbs with dirt for a short drive while the leave springs rested on the bump stops. Not fun, but no problems. Not sure I’d do it on a regular basis however with this truck. The current gen F-150s are know for liking to squat. I loose an inch loaded with just weekend camping gear. A SD might be a better option.
 
  #13  
Old 09-26-2017, 08:11 PM
forgottenben's Avatar
forgottenben
forgottenben is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I understand the 5.0s and 3.5s can all hold about 2k in payload. That should be adequate.
 
  #14  
Old 09-26-2017, 08:32 PM
Kingofwylietx's Avatar
Kingofwylietx
Kingofwylietx is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,631
Received 70 Likes on 56 Posts
Load capacity will range (approximately) from 1500-2500#.
Since you are still shopping, you can just look at the yellow sticker next to the driver's door striker. It's on all new trucks. Just try to pick a truck that meets your weight needs since it's a primary consideration.

Heck, it might make your decision easier because if you like a couple of them, just pick the one with the highest capacity.
 
  #15  
Old 09-27-2017, 01:34 PM
519DVX's Avatar
519DVX
519DVX is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'17 501 Lariat CrewCab 3.5 Eco with 5.5' bed - Payload at 1785 pounds
 


Quick Reply: 5.0 or 3.5 ecoboost mpg with load in truck bed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05 PM.