Ask the engineer for the new 6.2l gas engine!
Similar to a recent thread, where we had the lead engineer for the new 6.7 PSD engine on here, Adam Gryglak https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/9...oining-us.html
A gentleman called Mike Harrison, who is the lead engineer for the 6.2 engine will be on here to answer some questions about the 6.2 engine - so if you have any questions about this new V8, ask away! Some details on Mike: MIKE HARRISON - details :-X25 |
Excellent. I for one am happy to hear about fords new engine.
|
Hi folks, it's good to get the opportunity to answer any questions you may have on our new Ford 6.2L engine. I'll be checking into the forum 2 -3 times a day over the next week.
Mike Harrison.:) |
I am not a fan of aluminum heads on cast block..Other then that might be a good motor(PSD6.7)
|
Originally Posted by mike-v8ford
(Post 8463359)
Hi folks, it's good to get the opportunity to answer any questions you may have on our new Ford 6.2L engine. I'll be checking into the forum 2 -3 times a day over the next week.
Mike Harrison.:) Welcome to FTE and enjoy your stay here |
How does the 6.2 V8 stack up to the 6.8 V10?
|
I was wondering that my self..
|
Originally Posted by mike-v8ford
(Post 8463359)
Hi folks, it's good to get the opportunity to answer any questions you may have on our new Ford 6.2L engine. I'll be checking into the forum 2 -3 times a day over the next week.
Mike Harrison.:) To get the ball rolling, here are some questions for you, no doubt our users will have some more!
|
6.2L has significantly better fuel economy and is much more refined (noise and vibration).
6.2L has higher horsepower than the 6.8L 3V, but lower torque. As the saying goes, there is no replacement for displacement. The Horsepower and torque numbers will be released towards the end of Feb for 6.2L in Superduty, so I can't post them at this time. |
Hello Mike, got a few questions:
1. Will the 6.2L still carry the Triton name? 2. Has the spark plug problems that the Triton line's experienced for various reasons been fixed with the 6.2L? 3. Will the 6.2L replace the 5.4L in the F150 lineup? And will it's fuel economy be better if offered in the F150? I'm really interested in the last question since I owned a F150 with a 5.4L and will never own another based on it's performance and fuel economy. The hype this motor recieved in '97 just didn't come to reality in my opinion. It's just not an impressive motor...Hope the 6.2L changes people's perception! |
Originally Posted by Troy Buenger
(Post 8463711)
Hello Mike, got a few questions:
1. Will the 6.2L still carry the Triton name? 2. Has the spark plug problems that the Triton line's experienced for various reasons been fixed with the 6.2L? 3. Will the 6.2L replace the 5.4L in the F150 lineup? And will it's fuel economy be better if offered in the F150? I'm really interested in the last question since I owned a F150 with a 5.4L and will never own another based on it's performance and fuel economy. The hype this motor recieved in '97 just didn't come to reality in my opinion. It's just not an impressive motor...Hope the 6.2L changes people's perception! |
Hi Adrian - thanks for the welcome. It's 8:50pm here in SE Michigan.
To answer your questions.
|
Hi Troy.
The 6.2L will simply be called the 6.2L. (much like the 5.0 is the 5.0). The 6.2L has been designed with conventional 14mm spark plugs, and has 23mm of thread engagement. In fact we liked them so much, we put 2 in each cylinder. I don't foresee any issues. As you know - the 6.2L is in the Raptor, which is part of the F-150 family. Other than that, I can't comment on the future Powertrain line-up of the F-150. |
I know the 6.2's peak torque is lower than the 3V V10, but how do they compare at a lower RPM?
|
Hi, Mike!
One of the things we really love about the 5.4L was the really strong low RPM range. As little as 1,500 RPMs that motor I believe would pull with somewhere near 90% of peak torque. This makes it a great motor for towing because it's able to hold higher gears with a significant load, which is something the competition is lacking. Now you mentioned that the long stroke limited RPMs so one could assume that the new 6.2 uses a significantly shorter stroke. Will this hinder low RPM performance? Also, will the 6.2 use the same VCT system the 3V modular engines used? Thanks! |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands