Interesting 2010 info......6.2 V8
Just found this online and it lists the 6.2 as available in the 2010 F-150:
http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2009/08...ford-f150.html |
ahh i was excited there for a second. He also listed Raptor as one of the models. The 6.2 is confirmed for the Raptor, its even in the brochure. So it is fitting for Mike to list it as one of the engines. Not confirmed for anything else yet.
|
Yeah but I'm hopeful.
|
That article is very misleading. These are trim packages that make it impossible to get all the options and colors you want in a truck because they are reserved for their respective trims. There are to many trim lines! For example: I want a Lariat, but I can't get the stone grey interior because it is reserved for the Platinum. I want a Platinum but can't get the red or blue exterior because it is reserved for the lower trims. This goes on and on! It's actually more restrictive than ever.
|
I don't see why they wouldn't make it available to the XLT, FX4, Platinum, and Harley Davidson. Well maybe not the first 2.
How expensive of an option is the 6.2l? You'd think they would encourage people to select that option. |
OK, I have the stupid question about the 6.2.... Since they redesigned the 5.4 to a 3 valve to save gas and boost the EPA rating why did they not do the same thing for the 6.2? I would love to see a 6.2 with 3 Valves vs the 2 valves.
OK, I have the asbestos underwear on.....They ich..... |
well i hope they make the 6.2 the standard engine for the fx4
but what i wanted to know is whats the mpg going to be ...if i'm not mistakeing all truck have to be 25mpg by 2016 ...so i don't think they are going to take a step back by lossing mpg |
Originally Posted by fordtruckman
(Post 7795211)
I don't see why they wouldn't make it available to the XLT, FX4, Platinum, and Harley Davidson. Well maybe not the first 2.
How expensive of an option is the 6.2l? You'd think they would encourage people to select that option. |
Originally Posted by silver05fx4
(Post 7795402)
but what i wanted to know is whats the mpg going to be ...if i'm not mistakeing all truck have to be 25mpg by 2016 ...so i don't think they are going to take a step back by lossing mpg
The 25mpg is, I believe, an average mileage, just like CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) for cars. They have to limit the 6.2's to keep the overall average up. For the Superduty (F250 and up) line, there won't be mileage limits, I don't think. |
Originally Posted by Krewat
(Post 7798367)
I suspect it will be a VERY limited quantity in the 1/2 tons. Either it'll continue to be an expensive option so as to limit the people who buy it, or they will limit it to a certain version (Raptor) that's expensive, again to limit the people who buy it.
The 25mpg is, I believe, an average mileage, just like CAFE (corporate average fuel economy) for cars. They have to limit the 6.2's to keep the overall average up. For the Superduty (F250 and up) line, there won't be mileage limits, I don't think. It's been stated on previous discussions here that the 6.2L will be the engine for the raptor, base for the SD and optional on all other F-150's of certain trim levels. Tim |
Originally Posted by Aztrainer
(Post 7795374)
OK, I have the stupid question about the 6.2.... Since they redesigned the 5.4 to a 3 valve to save gas and boost the EPA rating why did they not do the same thing for the 6.2? I would love to see a 6.2 with 3 Valves vs the 2 valves.
OK, I have the asbestos underwear on.....They ich..... Using 2 intake valves allows the 3-valve engine to perform better AT HIGH RPM's. Multiple valves are used to more advantage in small engines that rev high. The 6.2 is designed with a larger bore (4" I believe, with capacity for larger bore). This enables the starting valve sizes to be bigger, and if it is a properly designed truck engine, it's designed to make more power at lower RPM's. There are a lot of great engines with 2 valves per cylinder--things like the old Chrysler hemi engine, the Chevy rat motor, etc... George |
Actually, the 3-valve configuration works well at low RPMs too, if you were to cut one intake runner at low RPMs. You'd get a lot more intake runner velocity at low end.
However, I don't think Ford does that ;) |
Originally Posted by Krewat
(Post 7801580)
Actually, the 3-valve configuration works well at low RPMs too, if you were to cut one intake runner at low RPMs. You'd get a lot more intake runner velocity at low end.
However, I don't think Ford does that ;) You can do a lot of tricks with variable valve lifts and stuff. I recall reading that Ford is setting up the 6.2 to be able to shut off cylinders for cruising mpg. It all adds complexity and cost, though. George |
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
(Post 7801779)
I recall reading that Ford is setting up the 6.2 to be able to shut off cylinders for cruising mpg.
It would be a good thing, I think, for MPGs. Might help the 6.2 get more exposure in the half-tons. |
If Ford offered the 6.2 in the F-150 XLT & UP, they would Rule the Pickup Truck World with a Iron Fist! They are crazy of they don't!...
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands