351W vs 351C
 

I have a question. What are the basic performance differences in low end HP and torque for the 351W vs 351C engines? Are they about the same? Are they substantially different? I have owned both engines in the past and realize the diferences in the head designs etc but how does this relate to the actual low end torque and HP?

351W vs 351C
 

I checked an older Motors Manual (1977-84) and came up with a couple of things: In 1978 Ford put the 351Ws and the 351Ms in their full size cars. The 351W speced at 144Hp @ 3200RPM with 277 lbs. torque at 1600 RPM. The 351M speced at 145HP at 3400 RPM and 273 lbs. torque at 1800 RPM. The year before that the 351M put out 16 more HP with a lower compression ratio, 8.3 verses 8.0, we'll have to ask Ford how they did that! My Ford SVO book says the 351C and the 351M were similar in design except for main bearing sizes and some block demensions. You had mentioned comparing to the 351C...it was only produced for 4 years 1970 through 1974...if you install a 1970 or 1971 it would have up to 10:1 compression and would probably produce more low end torque because of that. On the other hand the 351Cs with 4 bbl heads had larger valves and intake/exhaust passages which are fine for higher RPM usage but kill low end torque and HP. To sum it up...if your looking for low end alwys go for cubic inches...a 400M will move you quicker than a 351W-M-or C.

351W vs 351C
 

These numbers are rather dissappointing. I was really hoping for something in the 250 HP range. I guess there is a fundamental problem, trying to generate lots of torque at low (useable) RPM with a small block just is not going to happen. I guess i will start looking seriously at the mamoth 460 !

351W vs 351C
 

>These numbers are rather dissappointing. I was
>really hoping for something in the
>250 HP range. I guess there
>is a fundamental problem, trying to
>generate lots of torque at low
>(useable) RPM with a small block

Don't be fooled by these numbers.. It all depends on how the engine is built and what year it is.. For example, the 351w in my 1991 Crown Vic was 210 hp stock and 285 ft/lbs of torque.. with some new heads, different cam, new intake, etc, the engine easily makes 300 hp and probably almost 400 ft/lbs.. also, dont forget that this engine weighs less than a 351c or 351m and a lot less than a 460, which means your vehicle will get moving faster..

brent.

351W vs 351C
 

In 1971 the 351Cleveland 2V (that means 2 barrel carb)was rated at 240Hp.......I recall reading that in a Chilton's. If you have one--BUILD IT! The valves are big enough to handle a 4 barrel carb/intake and apropo cam.

351W vs 351C
 

I had a 351c in a 71 Torino, 2v head model, ran nice. Put on a performance intake manifold, 4 bbl carb and try to get headers. You won't be disappointed. It'll rock plenty

351W vs 351C
 

Ok, I've had quite a bit of expierence with the different 351's. First of all, let me say this.....STAY AWAY FROM THE 351-M!!!!! A friend of mine built one very stoutly, and it was a dog compared to a mildly built 351-W! As far as between the Windsor and Cleveland, what you have to determine is do you want much more power or much more available parts. The Windsor has many different parts available to it because Ford produced it for a very long time, and, quite frankly, it is a VERY strong and reliable small block. You could even easily (Compared to the Cleveland) go with Fuel Injection. I've heard, don't know for sure, but I've heard that if you place a 400-M Crank into a Windsor, all you have to do is alter the finring order and your little Windsor will have 400 cubes at its disposal. However, the Cleveland will produce LOTS more power, providing you can get a set of 4 barrel heads. My dad built a Cleveland using 4 barrel heads and put a mild cam and good aluminum intake on it and it SCREAMED !! It really had alot of power. If I had to choose, I would definitely go with the Cleveland. I'll have to be honest with you though, when I built a motor for my Thunderbird, I had a choice between a stroked 302, a 4 barrel 351 Cleveland, or.....the Mighty 460. I chose the 460 because its lower end is designed alot like a small block Ford with it's simple design (only much larger) but the upper end (mainly the heads) are designed with the Cleveland types of chambers which produce LOTS of power. Hope this helps.

TBirdGuy

351W vs 351C
 

Ok, I've had quite a bit of expierence with the different 351's. First of all, let me say this.....STAY AWAY FROM THE 351-M!!!!! A friend of mine built one very stoutly, and it was a dog compared to a mildly built 351-W! As far as between the Windsor and Cleveland, what you have to determine is do you want much more power or much more available parts. The Windsor has many different parts available to it because Ford produced it for a very long time, and, quite frankly, it is a VERY strong and reliable small block. You could even easily (Compared to the Cleveland) go with Fuel Injection. I've heard, don't know for sure, but I've heard that if you place a 400-M Crank into a Windsor, all you have to do is alter the finring order and your little Windsor will have 400 cubes at its disposal. However, the Cleveland will produce LOTS more power, providing you can get a set of 4 barrel heads. My dad built a Cleveland using 4 barrel heads and put a mild cam and good aluminum intake on it and it SCREAMED !! It really had alot of power. If I had to choose, I would definitely go with the Cleveland. I'll have to be honest with you though, when I built a motor for my Thunderbird, I had a choice between a stroked 302, a 4 barrel 351 Cleveland, or.....the Mighty 460. I chose the 460 because its lower end is designed alot like a small block Ford with it's simple design (only much larger) but the upper end (mainly the heads) are designed with the Cleveland types of chambers which produce LOTS of power. Hope this helps.

TBirdGuy

351W vs 351C
 

Ok, I've had quite a bit of expierence with the different 351's. First of all, let me say this.....STAY AWAY FROM THE 351-M!!!!! A friend of mine built one very stoutly, and it was a dog compared to a mildly built 351-W! As far as between the Windsor and Cleveland, what you have to determine is do you want much more power or much more available parts. The Windsor has many different parts available to it because Ford produced it for a very long time, and, quite frankly, it is a VERY strong and reliable small block. You could even easily (Compared to the Cleveland) go with Fuel Injection. I've heard, don't know for sure, but I've heard that if you place a 400-M Crank into a Windsor, all you have to do is alter the finring order and your little Windsor will have 400 cubes at its disposal. However, the Cleveland will produce LOTS more power, providing you can get a set of 4 barrel heads. My dad built a Cleveland using 4 barrel heads and put a mild cam and good aluminum intake on it and it SCREAMED !! It really had alot of power. If I had to choose, I would definitely go with the Cleveland. I'll have to be honest with you though, when I built a motor for my Thunderbird, I had a choice between a stroked 302, a 4 barrel 351 Cleveland, or.....the Mighty 460. I chose the 460 because its lower end is designed alot like a small block Ford with it's simple design (only much larger) but the upper end (mainly the heads) are designed with the Cleveland types of chambers which produce LOTS of power. Hope this helps.

TBirdGuy

351W vs 351C
 

Ok, I've had quite a bit of expierence with the different 351's. First of all, let me say this.....STAY AWAY FROM THE 351-M!!!!! A friend of mine built one very stoutly, and it was a dog compared to a mildly built 351-W! As far as between the Windsor and Cleveland, what you have to determine is do you want much more power or much more available parts. The Windsor has many different parts available to it because Ford produced it for a very long time, and, quite frankly, it is a VERY strong and reliable small block. You could even easily (Compared to the Cleveland) go with Fuel Injection. I've heard, don't know for sure, but I've heard that if you place a 400-M Crank into a Windsor, all you have to do is alter the finring order and your little Windsor will have 400 cubes at its disposal. However, the Cleveland will produce LOTS more power, providing you can get a set of 4 barrel heads. My dad built a Cleveland using 4 barrel heads and put a mild cam and good aluminum intake on it and it SCREAMED !! It really had alot of power. If I had to choose, I would definitely go with the Cleveland. I'll have to be honest with you though, when I built a motor for my Thunderbird, I had a choice between a stroked 302, a 4 barrel 351 Cleveland, or.....the Mighty 460. I chose the 460 because its lower end is designed alot like a small block Ford with it's simple design (only much larger) but the upper end (mainly the heads) are designed with the Cleveland types of chambers which produce LOTS of power. Hope this helps.

TBirdGuy

351W vs 351C
 

The hp and torque ratings vary considerably by year. In the 60's they usually advertized the highest rating they could to sell cars. Then when the the government and insurance companies threatened to quash the muscle cars they went to net horsepower which was a much lower figure. This began probably around 1970 and continues to this day. In the 70s and 80s hp was poor because of trying to meet pollution limits, but in the 90s things seem to have gotten better, esp with electronic fuel injection. Look at the '93 F150 with the 5.8 V8 (351) on MSN Carpoint it is rated 240 hp and 340 torque--plenty of power, expecially compared to the 1978 figures quoted above.

351W vs 351C