5 star tune v10 mpg improvements
Hi all. I have a 2011 v10 e350. I get about 10 city and 14.5 hwy. I was looking at Mikes 5 star tune and was looking to see what type of fuel increase everyone one seeing with a v10 3.73 gear. I have the 5spd torqueshift. I am hoping to achieve 12 mpg around town but I don't know if that is possible.
Thanks Bill |
Welcome to FTE Bill!
I don't think you'll see those kind of gains, but I'm hardly the expert. Paging @fordmdb. |
I have the 5 Star tuner and saw no mpg improvements. The tranny tuning is definitely the reason I got it though as it makes a huge improvement in the driveability and shift schedules.
Scott |
Scott, what type of mileage are you getting?
|
Originally Posted by NCMODELA
(Post 15783122)
Scott, what type of mileage are you getting?
These numbers are with a drop in air cleaner, tuner and exhaust. Scott |
Wow. That's lower than mine. What rear end gear do you have?
|
Originally Posted by NCMODELA
(Post 15783194)
Wow. That's lower than mine. What rear end gear do you have?
Best way to gain mileage is to not stop the van more than you need to. Starting and stopping 6000+lbs is the fuel killer. I also found that accelerating briskly to get to OD is a factor as well since the vans are tuned to shift into OD above 40mph no matter what. With the engine power and torque ratings on the V10 vans being so high, most of the city and hwy driving I do is terribly inefficient since the throttle opening is not optimized (no load). Higher RPM at lower load helps too, but this is unrealistic without a manual transmission. I still try to get as good of mileage as possible, but with gas under $3 per gallon I don't worry about it. It is efficient for a big block engine, just not optimized for potential in the van platform unless loaded to GVW. Scott |
Originally Posted by REDOVAL
(Post 15783219)
With the engine power and torque ratings on the V10 vans being so high, most of the city and hwy driving I do is terribly inefficient since the throttle opening is not optimized (no load). Higher RPM at lower load helps too, but this is unrealistic without a manual transmission.
I did some playing around with fuel economy with my ScanGauge a few years ago. Pulling my enclosed trailer I went from about 9 MPG in top gear to 7 MPG in 3rd at 62 MPH. This was in my Excursion that had the same V10 these vans do. You want to be in as high of gear as possible, as this operates the engine at the highest load which minimizes pumping losses. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.for...236f399ebe.gif |
Originally Posted by Tom
(Post 15783257)
Just wanted to clarify, engine efficiency at low load is horrible, and that doesn't get better with higher RPMs. Ideally you want the engine operating as close to maximum load as possible, which requires low RPMs unless you're accelerating.
I did some playing around with fuel economy with my ScanGauge a few years ago. Pulling my enclosed trailer I went from about 9 MPG in top gear to 7 MPG in 3rd at 62 MPH. This was in my Excursion that had the same V10 these vans do. You want to be in as high of gear as possible, as this operates the engine at the highest load which minimizes pumping losses. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.for...236f399ebe.gif My opinions only apply to the V10 engines though. My experience with the V8s suggests they are tuned pretty well from the factory and perform as one would expect. The V10s were intended for heavy load and motorhome use and suffer when unloaded (mis-applied). I love the power though compared to the V8s vans! Scott |
Most of my issue is that this is what my wife drives around town. Maybe 600 miles a month. So it really sees only in town mileage which is where it hurts the most. I can handle 15 hwy because we don't do it a ton.
That's weird your numbers are the opposite of mine. I'm 10 city, 14 hwy and 7.5 towing 6.5k trailer. |
City mileage is hugely variable. Everyone's driving is different, and the conditions can vary widely. One area could have six stop lights in a mile, and another only three.
Each time you stop your engine needs to burn the fuel to get the van going again. Speeds matter too, generally lower speeds are less efficient because the torque converter is unlocked more and you're in lower gears. So unless conditions and driving habits are identical you can't compare city mileage. |
So is it better to speed up quickly to get the convertor to lock?
|
Originally Posted by NCMODELA
So is it better to speed up quickly to get the convertor to lock?
|
Huh.
I've got a 2003 V10, 3.73, 285/65/16 tires (almost 33"). With cruise control on 70mph, I get 14.4mpg. At 55mph, I've seen nearly 16. |
Originally Posted by Tom
(Post 15783257)
Just wanted to clarify, engine efficiency at low load is horrible, and that doesn't get better with higher RPMs. Ideally you want the engine operating as close to maximum load as possible, which requires low RPMs unless you're accelerating.
I did some playing around with fuel economy with my ScanGauge a few years ago. Pulling my enclosed trailer I went from about 9 MPG in top gear to 7 MPG in 3rd at 62 MPH. This was in my Excursion that had the same V10 these vans do. You want to be in as high of gear as possible, as this operates the engine at the highest load which minimizes pumping losses. https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.for...236f399ebe.gif My wife says I have a heavy foot but the Lie-o-meter always improves several miles per gallon after I drive her/our Expedition. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands