Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/index.php)
-   1999 to 2016 Super Duty (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/forum30/)
-   -   Finned differential cover real benefits? (https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1597820-finned-differential-cover-real-benefits.html)

Overkill2 09-28-2019 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by geekwithoutacause (Post 18872146)
Does that one fit the 2011-2016 f250? Looks like the JEG model has the same inside shape. I just want that drain plug.
edit: woops, looks like it does not. Just noticed the small print under it.

Which one are you talking about? The OEM DOES NOT have a drain port but the Ebay does just like the Jeg's. From the EBay ad:

ALUMINUM 1986-UP FORD STERLING F-250-F-350 REAR DIFFERENTIAL COVER 10.5" RG 12 BOLT - BLACK

Ford Sterling black aluminum rear differential cover with 12 bolt pattern. Fits 12 bolt Ford truck rear ends with heavy-duty Sterling 10-1/2" ring gear. Includes bolts and drain plug.
HZ-5079 differential cover fits:
1986-UP Ford E-250 Van 2WD/4WD - Rear.
1986-UP Ford E-350 Van 2WD/4WD - Rear.
1986-UP Ford F-250 Truck 2WD/4WD - Rear.
1986-UP Ford F-350 Truck 2WD/4WD - Rear.
1999-UP Ford Excursion 2WD/4WD - Rear.

senix 09-28-2019 10:48 AM

I would be buying the OEM AL cover. Regardless of the drain port.

Issue is the pattern of spray to spread the lacrimation completely.

Overkill2 09-28-2019 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by senix (Post 18872220)
I would be buying the OEM AL cover. Regardless of the drain port.

Issue is the pattern of spray to spread the lacrimation completely.

Hey Senix, you see this from my Sterling thread:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post18872036

Interesting that the new 17's plus use 75w85 for the same Sterling 10.5 where I use 75w140.

senix 09-28-2019 11:27 AM


Originally Posted by Overkill2 (Post 18872229)
Hey Senix, you see this from my Sterling thread:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post18872036

Interesting that the new 17's plus use 75w85 for the same Sterling 10.5 where I use 75w140.

Yes I read that. Interesting, I can only speculate it is due to higher towing limits but also different components to get there allowed for a different line requirement

Bently_Coop 09-28-2019 12:55 PM

I will be definitely going for the Lubelocker gasket, need to find a cover for the front to match the OEM rear.

Overkill2 09-28-2019 02:39 PM

[QUOTE=senix;18872255]Yes I read that. Interesting, I can only speculate it is due to higher towing limits but also different components to get there allowed for a different line requirement[/QUOTE]

Yeah it makes you wonder, huh?

Y2KW57 09-28-2019 03:33 PM


Originally Posted by Overkill2 (Post 18872229)
Hey Senix, you see this from my Sterling thread:

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/1...l#post18872036

Interesting that the new 17's plus use 75w85 for the same Sterling 10.5 where I use 75w140.


Originally Posted by senix (Post 18872255)
Yes I read that. Interesting, I can only speculate it is due to higher towing limits but also different components to get there allowed for a different line requirement


Originally Posted by Overkill2 (Post 18872453)
Yeah it makes you wonder, huh?

My guess would be to increase FUEL ECONOMY, just like the gradual reduction of specified oil viscosity in engines that has taken place over the last 25 years.

As the formulations of lubricants and synthetics improves, and as the costs are lowered from volume efficiencies and lower cost formulations (hybridized synthetic bases), and as time and testing proves out the efficacy of less viscous synthetics still meeting the lubrication needs in high temperature operation... the specified weights of oils have dropped to reduce rotational resistance and thereby incrementally contribute to the constellation of increased efficiencies that result in better fuel economy.

TooManyToys. 09-28-2019 03:40 PM

Or the copywriter made an error. Not like that hasn't happened before .....

Or if they changed any components in the axle they may have had to change the spec.

geekwithoutacause 09-28-2019 07:11 PM


Originally Posted by TooManyToys. (Post 18872537)
Or the copywriter made an error. Not like that hasn't happened before .....

Or if they changed any components in the axle they may have had to change the spec.

Funny, that was my first thought too. Must be a typo.

Overkill2 09-28-2019 08:37 PM

Just checked it out. Redline, Valvoline, Castrol, Motorcraft, Honda, Mercedes and others make a 75w85. Hmmm...

Bugzilla46310 10-01-2019 05:29 AM

I went to my local Ford dealer where I bought the truck and got the part numbers for the differential covers that fit my truck (2016 F350). Here is what I could decipher. f82z 4033aa duel, bc3z 4033c duel, estz4033a steel, the one on my truck, bc3z4033b ??? Bc3z4033a is the aluminum cover you see for sale all over the Internet. I could not find anything on bc3z 4033B. Anyone have a description on the Ford number? I need to go back to Ford tonight so I may see if he has any more information. Thanks


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands