72 f100 relocate fuel tank?
#16
So what I did was to suggest an obvious and *unmentioned* option for everyone to consider. The OP didn't mention wanting a toolbox nor more space.
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
#18
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Ribera, Baja, Mexico
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes
on
25 Posts
To each his own amigo. All ideas are welcome in a 'brainstorm' session, which is part of what the forum is for. ie, the sharing of ideas. Yours is the obvious and easiest change, and what the factory chose to do in '67 -'72, but that is not the end of ideas. For instance, some like the bench seat, some like buckets. The factory chose a bench. Perhaps, its because they always did it that way. I am sure that nothing personal was intended, by the subsequent comments. All are trying to help, as few of us know it all.. and certainly not I.
Baja
Baja
#20
So what I did was to suggest an obvious and *unmentioned* option for everyone to consider. The OP didn't mention wanting a toolbox nor more space.
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
#21
So what I did was to suggest an obvious and *unmentioned* option for everyone to consider. The OP didn't mention wanting a toolbox nor more space.
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
#23
The Auxiliary Tank is different that saddle tanks; the auxiliary mounts inside the frame, mid-ship, and holds 20-25 gallons. Usually came on Camper Specials, but was an option for 2wd, and is still available new for a decent price.
#24
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Ribera, Baja, Mexico
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes
on
25 Posts
Saddle tanks are no safer than in the cab tanks, and may even be a bit more dangerous, as are only protected by the thin sheet metal of the bed. They also require cutting a hole in the side, and installing a small aux door. For me, safety was not the motivation for moving my in cab tank, added room for a behind the seat tool box was my focus. In Baja, I like carrying some tools, as AAA cannot come to your rescue, and self reliance is paramount to survival in remote locations.
Baja
Baja
#25
#26
So what I did was to suggest an obvious and *unmentioned* option for everyone to consider. The OP didn't mention wanting a toolbox nor more space.
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
Mounting a stock auxiliary tank is a *lot* easier than the between the rails tank.
My mention of the tank being safe was due to the *fact* that many people have been scared away from in-cab tanks.
But the responses that tried to do little more than attack my idea.
So why does anyone try to post helpful suggestions?
As a side note, my 68 C.S. has the aux tank you suggested. And has that big O' protective cover over the filler neck. Which takes away from bed volume. Tomahawk's idea of fuel filler placement is super cool. 2X Baja. You oughta check out his tank thread.
#27
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Ribera, Baja, Mexico
Posts: 2,694
Likes: 0
Received 43 Likes
on
25 Posts
Been there Jeff, and am a follower of Gavin's lead. His is the most savvy solution, to tank-between-frame rails, I have seen. If I can, I will incorporate his fill pipe design, in my truck. Photos to follow, when I get home to Baja. Dodging Tornadoes, floods, and sink holes in Texas at the moment. So far, so good, but more throughout the week are forecast. Keep your fingers crossed for me..
And Millam, 2x on Jeff's post. Keep on post'n..
Baja
And Millam, 2x on Jeff's post. Keep on post'n..
Baja
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
St_alfonzospancakebreakfa
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
10-13-2004 08:50 AM
davidstinson
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
10-03-2003 12:10 AM