1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

7.3 litre nonpower stroke vs 7.3 power stroke?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-25-2010, 06:55 AM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
7.3 litre nonpower stroke vs 7.3 power stroke?

How much harder are the power stroke diesels to work on than the nonpower stroke of like a 1990 f 350 pickup and how much more exspensive are they to fix.

I am looking at a power stroke but do not need the excess turbo power and my brother in law bought a 2006 6.0 new and that thing has not really been that good and real exspensie to work on. I know the old 6.9 and 7.3 were cheap to keep running Thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 05-25-2010, 07:08 AM
riverrat41's Avatar
riverrat41
riverrat41 is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glen Rose,Texas
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Really not much different at all.You have the turbo added to the PS's.If you have any mechanical ability at all and with help from us you can do just about what you need to do.Especially maintenance items.
You will really like the PS.....I promise
I would stay with the 7.3.Most reliable and easier to work on.
 
  #3  
Old 05-25-2010, 07:38 AM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
You are not kidding I could not believe how much trouble my brother in laws 6.0 has been. 205000 miles is nothing for on of these correct? what kind of mileage figures? Thankyou for the quick reply!
 
  #4  
Old 05-25-2010, 07:48 AM
mechelement's Avatar
mechelement
mechelement is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 3,329
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
I own a 6.9L IDI and 7.3L PSD. The PSD pulls a lot harder than the 6.9. The 6.9 is a whole lot easier to work on and parts are much less. A vehicle is as reliable as it's been treated and maintained.
 
  #5  
Old 05-25-2010, 07:51 AM
riverrat41's Avatar
riverrat41
riverrat41 is offline
Postmaster

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glen Rose,Texas
Posts: 2,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Realslowww
You are not kidding I could not believe how much trouble my brother in laws 6.0 has been. 205000 miles is nothing for on of these correct? what kind of mileage figures? Thankyou for the quick reply!
I have read on here anywhere from 12-21mpg's.It just depends on the gears,mods,driving conditions and how you treat one.
I am not twisting your arm but you will not go wrong with a 7.3 PS if you are wanting a diesel.
 
  #6  
Old 05-25-2010, 11:20 AM
Seven-Point-Three's Avatar
Seven-Point-Three
Seven-Point-Three is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would say that you're average 7.3L is going to be 14-16mpg city driving and 16-18mpg highway. As Barry said you're not gonna go wrong with a 7.3L.
 
  #7  
Old 05-25-2010, 02:20 PM
farmb0y's Avatar
farmb0y
farmb0y is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Realslowww
I am looking at a power stroke but do not need the excess turbo power
What kind of statement is that?!?!?
J/K.
If you are familiar with the older 7.3, you'll only like the PS even more. They are a great running engine, and can be made to run even better with a few simple mods. Find a good truck that's been well maintained, and it should last you quite a while.

I have an early '99 with just over 250k on it. I have had to rebuild the tranny and just put in a transfer case, but neither were originally designed for the power that's going to them. The motor is running better than ever though. I figured it'd be blown up by now with what I've done to the truck and the towing I do with it. I make it earns it's keep, and it's doing that and more.
 
  #8  
Old 05-25-2010, 06:01 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
thankyou for the replies,
 
  #9  
Old 05-25-2010, 07:25 PM
Kwikkordead's Avatar
Kwikkordead
Kwikkordead is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rio Rico, AZ.
Posts: 24,502
Received 791 Likes on 603 Posts
Originally Posted by farmb0y
What kind of statement is that?!?!?
J/K.
.
I've often thought that what if Ford had kept the 6.0 HP tuning to 250 that they would have not had as much trouble with it.
I think they would have been a good engine if they weren't pushed so hard.
 
  #10  
Old 05-26-2010, 06:50 AM
Seven-Point-Three's Avatar
Seven-Point-Three
Seven-Point-Three is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting opinion on the 6.0 liters. Guess they were trying to have a bigger number than the competitors, rather than a reliable engine.
 
  #11  
Old 05-26-2010, 03:19 PM
farmb0y's Avatar
farmb0y
farmb0y is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: IOWA
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kwikkordead
I've often thought that what if Ford had kept the 6.0 HP tuning to 250 that they would have not had as much trouble with it.
I think they would have been a good engine if they weren't pushed so hard.
Oh, I agree completely. I've heard the saying "RPM's kills engines". The 6.0L were/are a high revving diesel engine, two things (in my mind) that don't go together.
 
  #12  
Old 05-26-2010, 04:18 PM
snakedoc's Avatar
snakedoc
snakedoc is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: AL, Reform
Posts: 4,006
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
the 7.3 are very easy to work on, and have a long life.
 
  #13  
Old 05-26-2010, 05:47 PM
Realslowww's Avatar
Realslowww
Realslowww is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by farmb0y
Oh, I agree completely. I've heard the saying "RPM's kills engines". The 6.0L were/are a high revving diesel engine, two things (in my mind) that don't go together.
You cannot run a high compression motor and turn alot of rpm with it and expect it to live.

By the way i bought a F150 with a 4.6, the way the economy is and unless it picks up a real truck is not necessary and trying to scrap by economically in these times is. I BID ON A 7.3 POWERSTROKE ON EBAY LAST NIGHT AND COULD HAVE EASILY WON IT BUT DID NOT BID HIGH ON PURPOSE because after I opened the hood and looked at one it looked complicated as all hell compared to my old 6.9 and 7.3.

I priced the power stroke costs and it is exspensive to service and unless you really have a real use for one for work they are not really practical! they sound really cool however. Sorry about the caps.
 
  #14  
Old 05-26-2010, 07:15 PM
Seven-Point-Three's Avatar
Seven-Point-Three
Seven-Point-Three is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Whitewater, WI
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to hear you are moving away from the 7.3 powerstrokes. I wouldn't advise buying any truck on EBAY anyway.

Take care
 
  #15  
Old 05-26-2010, 07:32 PM
mechelement's Avatar
mechelement
mechelement is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Eaton, CO
Posts: 3,329
Received 12 Likes on 10 Posts
Realslowww, I thought the same thing because I was looking at 12V's and IDI's before the PSD. I finally needed a truck NOW for our business and bought a PSD. This forum has superlative technical help. I've yet to find another forum with as detailed write-ups or with the plethora of links to write-ups. One of the Cummins forum was really good too actually (Gen 1).

If you want to shy away from the PSD, the IDI's are good motors. You can build them for a higher boost turbo system, but you'll pay to play. That guy Dave Sponolgue (sp?) in the IDI forum has a sick built 6.9L.
 


Quick Reply: 7.3 litre nonpower stroke vs 7.3 power stroke?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:26 PM.