1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Ranger mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-17-2010, 08:59 PM
bmac4020's Avatar
bmac4020
bmac4020 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ranger mileage

What kind of mileage could I expect from a Ranger 4 cyl 5 spd?

Thanks,
Brian
 
  #2  
Old 02-18-2010, 01:18 PM
Chickenguts's Avatar
Chickenguts
Chickenguts is offline
5th Wheeling
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a 1990 4 cyl 5 spd and it gets close to 30 mpg. Of course this truck does not have power anything except wipers ha ha.
 
  #3  
Old 02-18-2010, 01:36 PM
LMS Residential's Avatar
LMS Residential
LMS Residential is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago and Mt Carroll IL
Posts: 6,243
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
97 2.3 5spd, not driven nicely.......21 mpg city/hwy avg. winter/ 24 mpg city/hwy avg. summer, no a/c. On the rare occasion I have an "all highway" tank, 30 mpg if you keep your foot out of it. almost 216k on the odo.
 
  #4  
Old 02-18-2010, 02:07 PM
smlford's Avatar
smlford
smlford is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SML / Hatteras
Posts: 1,308
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
My '07 2.3 w/ auto gets me a solid 26 MPG. I run synthetic oil which helps a litttle.
 
  #5  
Old 02-18-2010, 04:56 PM
markfh11q's Avatar
markfh11q
markfh11q is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty good mileage with basic fuel, exhaust, and electronics maintenance.

I used to own the same basic ranger I have now... 2.3 i4, manual transmission, 1996, and I believe I measured it at 24 MPG. Of course, that was out in the boon docks. Now I live in the city, and my pre-cat oxygen sensor is non-functional at the moment.

Really can't tell you the odometer reading at the moment because... ah... it doesn't work, Mrs. Public Notary. I know it had 102K miles on it January of last year, though, according to the title...
 
  #6  
Old 02-19-2010, 08:55 PM
lariat97's Avatar
lariat97
lariat97 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: North west La
Posts: 7,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have the 3.slow V6. It barely gets 20 mpg highway. It does have 4.10 gears which makes it run 3000 rpm at 75 mph. Its a great truck except for the mileage. I'd got a 4.0 if I'd known about the 3.0 fuel economy. It would have some power. The 3.0 is weak.
 
  #7  
Old 02-20-2010, 06:11 AM
LMS Residential's Avatar
LMS Residential
LMS Residential is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Chicago and Mt Carroll IL
Posts: 6,243
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
You have not experienced slow until you try to climb a grade in the wind in a 2.3, it's a physics lesson.
 
  #8  
Old 02-20-2010, 06:40 PM
Dale_K's Avatar
Dale_K
Dale_K is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 2002 4 cyl with manual trans got a measured 29 mpg when I filled it up this week. That was for the entire tank, 290 miles on 10 gallons. It's has a 3.73 rear and won't pull hills in 5th gear.
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.