First drive! Edelbrock F-150 supercharged
#16
There is indeed. Although only made popular recently, the inverted blower design has been around since the late-90's.
The theory behind it is that not only does it allow for the use of longer runners (which we know promotes better low end torque), but the incoming airflow only has to make 1 180* turn upon exiting the discharge port of the blower before entering the cylinder heads, limiting distortion and turbulance. Where with your standard top mount blower system, the air has to make 2 180* turns which adds to the restriction and ultimatley slows velocity to a some degree.
Case in point....here are a couple of photo's of the ALLEN set up (the same one I've got on my 2V '96 Cougar XR7). The originators of the inverse blower design.
The original REV I kit
Underside shot of their later REV II design
Their old 2V F150 kit
Although because of their use of a smaller Eaton M90S blower, the ALLEN kits were never huge horsepower makers, they did however put out plenty of torque and at very low RPM. My little 4.6L PI engine puts out 430lb ft of flywheel torque as low as 2,200RPM. That's about 220lbs ft of torque more than it was putting out in stock trim at that same RPM.
The theory behind it is that not only does it allow for the use of longer runners (which we know promotes better low end torque), but the incoming airflow only has to make 1 180* turn upon exiting the discharge port of the blower before entering the cylinder heads, limiting distortion and turbulance. Where with your standard top mount blower system, the air has to make 2 180* turns which adds to the restriction and ultimatley slows velocity to a some degree.
Case in point....here are a couple of photo's of the ALLEN set up (the same one I've got on my 2V '96 Cougar XR7). The originators of the inverse blower design.
The original REV I kit
Underside shot of their later REV II design
Their old 2V F150 kit
Although because of their use of a smaller Eaton M90S blower, the ALLEN kits were never huge horsepower makers, they did however put out plenty of torque and at very low RPM. My little 4.6L PI engine puts out 430lb ft of flywheel torque as low as 2,200RPM. That's about 220lbs ft of torque more than it was putting out in stock trim at that same RPM.
Hey, an Allen supercharger! I thought nobody has ever seen these. My only experience is from my old Mustang club. The chapter president had a 1996 GT with an Allen supercharger. Interesting design. Sorry, I got off topic LOL...
#17
The first pic posted is actually an underhood shot of my car.
Good enough to take my Cougar at nearly 4,200lbs (with me in it) from high-15's, to 12.7's at nearly 110mph and still provide better than stock drivability and fuel economy.
.....and yes, sorry for the derailment. Just though I'd touch on the inverted blower subject a little.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vin Diseal
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
0
08-03-2015 01:11 AM