351C Intake Manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-10-2010, 05:57 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
351C Intake Manifolds

Anyone ever drove and could compare a 351C with 2V heads running a 4V intake/4 barrel carb to a 351C with 2V heads to the newer 2V intake/4 barrel carb? The reason I ask is there seems to be a mismatch on the 2, 3, 6, and 7 cylinders between the intake and the ports on the 2V heads with the 4V intake. Does anyone know how this effects performance? Would the newer intake that matches up all the runners and ports run better?

Summit has a 2V intake (4V carb) that I am considering. Anyone ever drove a 351C with this type of intake...

Weiand 7516 - Weiand X-CELerator Intake Manifolds - Overview - SummitRacing.com?

How does it compare to a 4V intake on 2V heads? Anyone?
 
  #2  
Old 01-10-2010, 11:19 AM
brownfoot's Avatar
brownfoot
brownfoot is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have a Cleveland wit 2bbl heads and Edlebrock dual plane manifold with 600 cfm Edlebrock carb.
it works well in a '70 cougar
when I built it I looked at the stock 4 bbl intake and gaskets and decided the fit did not look good, waaaay too bid for the 2 bbl heads and some mis-match, so went with the Edlebrock that matched very well
 
  #3  
Old 01-12-2010, 03:29 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brownfoot
have a Cleveland wit 2bbl heads and Edlebrock dual plane manifold with 600 cfm Edlebrock carb.
it works well in a '70 cougar
when I built it I looked at the stock 4 bbl intake and gaskets and decided the fit did not look good, waaaay too bid for the 2 bbl heads and some mis-match, so went with the Edlebrock that matched very well
Ya, with the port mismatch on cylinders 2, 3, 6, and 7, and all the larger runners, it has to be robbing low-end/mid-range power, or it stands to reason. Maybe not. Thanks for the reply.
 
  #4  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:48 AM
Jetman's Avatar
Jetman
Jetman is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alaska
Posts: 157
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a weiand x-cellerator on my 2V Cleveland and it runs great. It seems that this is the perfect match. I noticed a great increase in throttle response and midrange power.
 
  #5  
Old 01-25-2010, 05:17 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jetman
I have a weiand x-cellerator on my 2V Cleveland and it runs great. It seems that this in the perfect match. I notice a great increase in throttle response and midrange power.
Ya, I'm considering getting one as well. Glad to hear it works good with the 2V heads! Thanks for the reply.
 
  #6  
Old 05-15-2011, 06:05 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jetman
I have a weiand x-cellerator on my 2V Cleveland and it runs great. It seems that this is the perfect match. I noticed a great increase in throttle response and midrange power.
Originally Posted by brownfoot
have a Cleveland wit 2bbl heads and Edlebrock dual plane manifold with 600 cfm Edlebrock carb.
it works well in a '70 cougar
when I built it I looked at the stock 4 bbl intake and gaskets and decided the fit did not look good, waaaay too bid for the 2 bbl heads and some mis-match, so went with the Edlebrock that matched very well

I installed an Offenhauser intake with 4V carb square bore made for the 2V heads, and it does run better than the 4V intake did. It has a more linear acceleration and overall smoother power curve. The 4V intake will run on the 2V heads, but this Offy seems to run better, at least on my stock setup. :yahoo:

I installed the 4V Edlebrock intake on another 351C that has a set of rebuilt 4V closed chamber heads! What a power house! Whoever said that the 4V heads don't work on the street? I am very happy with those CC heads, and I'm running pump gas with no pre-ignition problems, MSD 6AL, SS valves, new springs/dampners, 650 Holley carb, and believe it or not, it still has the 2V cam (soon to be upgraded), but i just wanted to see how much of a difference the 4V CC heads would make by themselves. Huge difference! It seems to like higher rpm or there is more of a punch from throttle movement above 2000 rpm. It still has ***** below 2000 rpm, but there is more brute force above 2000 rpm. I still like the 4V CC heads better than the 2V heads. Cam upgrade is next. I can't wait!
 
  #7  
Old 05-16-2011, 12:49 AM
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
wyoming4x4 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wyoming
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
port mismatch?

On your intake being a big port going to a small port. Yes their is big mismatch but my question is with the gskts sealin. Are you using cobrajet gskts or standard 2v gskts. i know going from 2v intake to cobrajet heads they don't seal perfect at the top of the port with the 2v gskts. Gonna be some vacume leaks for sure. building a cobrajet headed 400 ford and using a airgap intake from a 351 cleveland with spacer plates. But with the port mismatch I've done some epoxy work on intakes to help get my port matching better. Now I've sent my heads and intake off to a flow bench to get flowed and ports fine tuned for even flow between each cylinder and get the airgap intake to flow to heads evenly. Just dropped off last week. Once I get my flow numbers I will document them on in my 400 4v thread. The air gap is a good intake and if you do some work to them they are even better. I wouldn't reccomend you 4v intake for your application instead look into a weiand intake or something of that type or the edelbrock air gap. good luck and curious to how things work out.
 
  #8  
Old 05-16-2011, 09:57 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally, the 2V 351C had a 4V Edlebrock intake bolted on, and it seemed to run good. I tore down the engine, bought all the parts and rebuilt it. When I got to the point of bolting the intake back on, I realized that the 2V intake gaskets would definately not seal properly. I got a set of 4V intake gaskets and high temp gasket sealer, and I had no trouble with leaks.

Now, I have an Offenhauser intake made for the 2V heads with a square bore 4V carb mount. It seems to run smoother with this intake, but both of them ran good, even with the port mismatch.
 
  #9  
Old 05-16-2011, 02:03 PM
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
wyoming4x4 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wyoming
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
ports mismatch stuff?

I did a 429 cobrajet intake on a set of Dove heads/non cjheads smaller ports many yrs ago. the ports on a cj are huge compared to the standard port and had problems down low on rpms and once rolling in the 2500rpm and up seem to be OK and was a mudder for many yrs. eventually went to a weiand stealth intake and better matching port set up and just help broaden my rpm range low and high rpms. On your set up going from big port to smaller port creates lots of volume in intake. The shelf from intake to cyl head creates some port disturbance and your possibly losing something especially down in low rpm range. volume in intake port is good especially when its moving/velocity. If slow it tends to puddle up or gasoline goes from a liquid state to a vapor and if slows down to much causes puddling in intake and meaning went to a liquid state. try to keep in a vapor when hitting combustion chamber. another thing to help is the carb with the different boosters within the carbs downleg or annular or straights and several other variations of these things inside carb. The annulars really help get fuel to a vapor especially in a weak signal of air being drawn through carb. their is more to this but not enough time. I like my 4wds and used to mud race for many yrs but I like to build good 4wd mountain trucks her in wyo. Sorry for rambling but this is where I'm at in building my 400 and sent my heads to get flowed and evened out on flows. Catch you later.
 
  #10  
Old 05-17-2011, 02:06 AM
Ranger92's Avatar
Ranger92
Ranger92 is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for all the information. Sounds like you're going to have fun with that 400!
 
  #11  
Old 05-17-2011, 07:30 PM
wyoming4x4's Avatar
wyoming4x4
wyoming4x4 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: wyoming
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just checkin in.

yeah ranger I'm currently working the very problem you speak of and correcting similar to your question. I say going from small port intake to big port head not so bad. Things can be worked and modified. but the Reverse big port to small kinda sucks. It works but the trick is the turndown to intake valve area is decent but with a 4v intake port being so big kinda defeats itself. these are things that keep me up at night!!! my situation is the opposite of yours. check out my albums and you can see where I did some epoxy work to intakes for cobrajet head and kinda get the picture. hit wyoming4x4 and check out some of my photo's
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BiltFordTuff
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
10
03-07-2017 08:51 PM
ryanparhaniemi
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
20
11-26-2016 09:41 PM
BigCountry1978
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
01-04-2016 09:37 PM
jredline1984
All Other Items for Sale
1
01-10-2014 11:10 PM
pward76
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
20
12-04-2003 05:27 PM



Quick Reply: 351C Intake Manifolds



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:49 PM.