1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DP Tuner

7.3 or 6.0L??? What years?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-29-2009, 02:49 AM
BioDiesel BOB's Avatar
BioDiesel BOB
BioDiesel BOB is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 7.3 or 6.0L??? What years?

hello all. I would like to inquire as to the better motor. My intentions are to run 100% Biodiesel and get off Foreign oil! Which would be a better candidate?? I've been told to say away from the 2003-2004 6.0L model years reference to a crappy turbo. Also if anyone could chime in as to biodiesel. I talked to a diesel mechanic tonite and he was kinda frowning upon Bio-D as he said Bio-D has the tendency to hold water and mess up the engine. He was referring to home brewers and couldn't advise on ASTM standard Bio-D. Would ASTM bio-d be ok, or is there a possibility that that too would harm the engine. I'm starting to look but have about a 3-4 month wait before I can buy. Any help greatly appreciated---Biodiesel BOB
 
  #2  
Old 06-29-2009, 03:37 AM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75
mongo75 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Welcome to FTE Bob!! The 7.3 would be a great candidate for bio. Even the earlier 94-97 would be great too. If all you plan on doing is getting a diesel truck to run on B100, then a certain year 7.3 really doesn't matter. I would advise you to go a little further down the row of forums, and dive headfirst into the "ALTERNATIVE FUELS" section, you will get the best info on Bio and any other kinda fuel i.e.- WVO, than anywhere else I've found. Good luck and have fun!!
 
  #3  
Old 06-29-2009, 04:44 AM
orng1's Avatar
orng1
orng1 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Paramount, Ca
Posts: 4,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was looking at an older 7.3 truck with no turbo to run on veg oil. They don't have the power but I heard they are better for MPG than the others.
 
  #4  
Old 06-29-2009, 06:55 AM
Izzy351's Avatar
Izzy351
Izzy351 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth
Posts: 14,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I'd say if you're going for a 6.0, stay with the 06/07 years, although we had EGR issues with the 06s we had in Iraq. If you're staying completely stock, the 6.0 will have better power, but if you get a 7.3, you'll have fewer problems overall, I believe. If you do a few simple mods to the 7.3, it'll be right there with the 6.0 as far as power/acceleration. Personally, I prefer the 02/03 7.3s because of the slightly better creature comfort upgrades, but there isn't anything wrong with the earlier models. Be careful with the 01s though -- they have a mechanical diode problem in the trans. The 4R100 already has a spotty record, and they made it worse in 01.

There's my $0.02...
 
  #5  
Old 06-29-2009, 08:57 AM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Better motor, 7.3 hands down. With a 6 liter you have to worry about head gaskets, turbo's. injectors, and the list goes on. Thats in stock form!

I have seen lots of diesel trucks when I worked out in the oil patch, and its been my experience that the poor 6 liter trucks arent just 03-04 years, they range from 03-07. Seems you either get a good one, or you dont.
 
  #6  
Old 06-29-2009, 09:09 AM
papadelogan's Avatar
papadelogan
papadelogan is offline
Snowboard season cometh..

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gulf Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think if you're 100% certain you're going to be running bio, then the 94-97 7.3 would be best. You can still tune them up, but they came with 2 tanks from the factory. The small one could be used for regular #2 in the winter for startup/shutdown, and the main/big tank for bio.

6.0s can be good motors & run fine off bio, but some of the known issues with that engine can be pricey to fix.

99+ 7.3s will be faster, but again, single tank.
 
  #7  
Old 06-29-2009, 12:00 PM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75
mongo75 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Brendan, you brought up a great point with the two tank trucks- when running WVO, you need a 2 tank system, and in this case the factory did everything for you (well, except for the heat components for the WVO)
 
  #8  
Old 06-29-2009, 12:19 PM
Calli's Avatar
Calli
Calli is offline
Senior User

Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hot Springs Village, Ar
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Izzy351
I'd say if you're going for a 6.0, stay with the 06/07 years, although we had EGR issues with the 06s we had in Iraq. If you're staying completely stock, the 6.0 will have better power, but if you get a 7.3, you'll have fewer problems overall, I believe. If you do a few simple mods to the 7.3, it'll be right there with the 6.0 as far as power/acceleration. Personally, I prefer the 02/03 7.3s because of the slightly better creature comfort upgrades, but there isn't anything wrong with the earlier models. Be careful with the 01s though -- they have a mechanical diode problem in the trans. The 4R100 already has a spotty record, and they made it worse in 01.

There's my $0.02...
Izzy,
How much trouble to fix the diode problem in the '01. I am looking at one for my Sister.
Thanks
 
  #9  
Old 06-29-2009, 12:38 PM
binuya's Avatar
binuya
binuya is offline
Fleet Mechanic

Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,573
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by papadelogan
I think if you're 100% certain you're going to be running bio, then the 94-97 7.3 would be best. You can still tune them up, but they came with 2 tanks from the factory. The small one could be used for regular #2 in the winter for startup/shutdown, and the main/big tank for bio.

6.0s can be good motors & run fine off bio, but some of the known issues with that engine can be pricey to fix.

99+ 7.3s will be faster, but again, single tank.

Good point, but I believe biodiesel Bob was refering to biodiesel. Straight WVO and biodiesel are two different things.

Straight WVO requires vehicle mods, as you pointed out, and biodiesel requires no mods to vehicle. But, someone should be able to correct me if I'm wrong, some of the earlier runs of the '94-'97 7.3's might have rubber components in the fuel system. So if he were to run bio, he would need to change out those hoses and/or o-rings to biodiesel compatible ones. (i.e. Viton)

As far as which engine, the 7.3 has far more tolerant injectors than the 6.0. I know people including myself, that have run sub-standard bio in it without incident. On the other hand I know more than a few who have run 'off' batches of bio in their 6.0 and had to replace injectors and their pumps within a thousand miles of that tank full.

Kinda' goes without saying, my vote goes to the 7.3
 
  #10  
Old 06-29-2009, 02:15 PM
Izzy351's Avatar
Izzy351
Izzy351 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas-Ft. Worth
Posts: 14,541
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Calli
Izzy,
How much trouble to fix the diode problem in the '01. I am looking at one for my Sister.
Thanks
Basically, a complete trans rebuild or replacement. Not cheap. But not all '01s have it. Get the build date (it's on a sticker in the driver's door jamb) -- someone here probably has a link or knows the cut-off for it. I don't remember since I have an '02...
 
  #11  
Old 06-29-2009, 03:09 PM
mongo75's Avatar
mongo75
mongo75 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yeah any rubber hoses would have to be replaced with new hose. Not sure what it's made from. I'm pretty sure you can get diesel fuel hose from a West Marine and it'll work.
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.