390 Crankshaft install..feels very tight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-19-2013, 10:36 PM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
390 Crankshaft install..feels very tight

I finally got around to installing my crank and mains. After installing the mains the crank seems very tight. I can still spin it, but takes a lot of effort. If I let it sit for a minute or two, I can't spin it from the end with one hand. I have to use two hands to get it going. Once its going, I can spin it with one hand. But, it stops almost instantly after I let go. See Video below. I checked the clearances with plastiguage (red) as shown in pictures. (Should I have used green?) All were exactly the same just a hair under .002 I used Clevite bearings and Clevite Cam Guard Assembly lube, recommended by my machine shop. I torque the mains down slowly from the middle (thrust bearing) to the outside. Checked them between barely snugging them, firmly snugging them and then torqued to 95 foot pounds. After the final torque to 95 foot pounds is when it got harder to turn. I removed the rear main seal to eliminate that as a possible problem, but still seems tight. Is this acceptable? Should it be this tight?



Here's a video

<iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Jwl0vG8uR2g" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" width="420"></iframe>

Here's pics of Plastiguage check. (Checked them with dry bearings.)

<a href="http://s96.photobucket.com/user/jonezzzman/media/IMG_18991.jpg.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://i96.photobucket.com/albums/l170/jonezzzman/IMG_18991.jpg" border="0" alt=" photo IMG_18991.jpg"/></a>


 
  #2  
Old 08-19-2013, 11:23 PM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well here's new information: when I torque main cap #2, that's when the crank seems to get really tight. I kept all the mains in the same order and they are all facing forward. So, not sure what's going on.
 
  #3  
Old 08-20-2013, 11:29 AM
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Freightrain is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Well, after watching the video, it doesn't seem to awfully tight. You have to remember you only have .001 per side clearance and the lube is using that up.

If only one main bearing cap makes it noticably tighter, then there might be an issue. Try swapping the bearing shells to another spot(1 or 4) and see if the issue repeats in that spot. If the issue stays with #2 then likely that journal is tighter(bigger) then the rest. Plastic gage is okay, but when you are dealing with the clearance you have, it could be off enough to not show how tight it actually is.

Without the rear seal it should spin freely and coast. If you left the upper half of the rear seal in the block, then it will still be "snug" feeling. It won't coast after spinning.
 
  #4  
Old 08-20-2013, 11:57 AM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I took the rear main seal completely out to eliminate that as a possible problem. I also tried swapping the bottom bearing from #2 and number #4. The problem is still with number 2 being noticeably tighter than the rest. The crank only coasts for about half inch to an inch but stops almost instantly after I let go of it.
 
  #5  
Old 08-20-2013, 01:23 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Reassemble it using STP oil treatment. Cam lube is cam lube. The thick stuff tends to accumulate in the oiling holes in a crank and stays put, limiting oil supply. You might also want to try swapping the 2 & 4 main caps. I've run across one 390 years ago that had the caps mixed up at the factory (numbers didn't work as indicated) It gave me fits until we moved the caps around and found the right combination.
 
  #6  
Old 08-20-2013, 03:58 PM
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
hiball3985 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tujunga, calif
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
From the video it looks like it is free enough, make sure the thrust bearing is set properly and you should be good.
 
  #7  
Old 08-21-2013, 11:28 AM
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Freightrain is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by baddad457
Reassemble it using STP oil treatment. Cam lube is cam lube. The thick stuff tends to accumulate in the oiling holes in a crank and stays put, limiting oil supply. You might also want to try swapping the 2 & 4 main caps. I've run across one 390 years ago that had the caps mixed up at the factory (numbers didn't work as indicated) It gave me fits until we moved the caps around and found the right combination.
Not something I would recommend. Only unless you know you are going to resize things. Better fit or not, just swapping mains caps is not a reliable thing to do.

Ditto on setting the thrust bearing properly. Don't just torque the cap. You need seat the surfaces against the crank thrust face.
 
  #8  
Old 08-21-2013, 02:46 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Freightrain
Not something I would recommend. Only unless you know you are going to resize things. Better fit or not, just swapping mains caps is not a reliable thing to do.

Ditto on setting the thrust bearing properly. Don't just torque the cap. You need seat the surfaces against the crank thrust face.
The 390 in question had the caps mixed at the factory, so moving them around is the only way you can determine that they're numbered wrong. If everything doens't fit as numbered, then the "fit" is obviously off. After this one engine build, every one afterwards got closer attention to the details as it was disassembled to verify the numbers were correct. This is also important when taking a reman engine apart, only then everything needs to be re-marked as the reman builders have a habit of assembling engines from many others.
 
  #9  
Old 08-22-2013, 09:27 AM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks again for all the feedback. I took the crank and block back to the machine shop, yesterday. They checked the crank for straightness and said it is straight. They did mention that the main journals are measuring on the full side. They are going to check the block for straightness. And, won't charge me if it is since I had it bored and honed there. They didn't check it originally, because there was no indication of a problem with the main bearings. Had there been a problem, they would have checked it.

Also, I did contact Survival Motorsports again, and they recommended checking it with a dial indicator. They also recommended line boring the block, which I will have done, if it needs it.

Also, baddad457, I asked the machine shop about the assembly lube they gave me. They said it's the same stuff that comes in the big bottle of assembly lube. They just name it differently in the small bottle. And, I'm using Schneider Racing Cam's cam lube for the cam lobes.

This is the second engine I've built and I'm learning a lot this time. I never worried about this stuff on the last engine I built. That was about 20 years ago. And, I drove the crap out that engine and it's still going. If I remember right, I used STP to assemble that one. Only problem I had with it was a lifter went bad and a blown head gasket between 2 cylinders. I won't use Mr Gasket head gaskets anymore.
 
  #10  
Old 08-22-2013, 01:28 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 297 Likes on 156 Posts
First thing I thought of when I read the title of this threads was "check the line bore"...

These guys already got you covered

I gotta say, having watched the video just now, it doesn't look tight to me.
 
  #11  
Old 08-22-2013, 01:50 PM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah The video is kind of deceiving. After I left the crank sit for a minute or two I had to use both hands on the end to get it spinning. Then it would be okay until I let it sit again.
 
  #12  
Old 08-23-2013, 01:23 AM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the results are in. #2 and #4 were a hair high. Had it line bored. All seems pretty good now. Frustrating that they didn't check it when the tanked and bored the cylinders. On the bright side, I've learned a few things. This is only my second rebuild, ever. Last one was about 20 years ago. I don't remember checking all this stuff.
 
  #13  
Old 08-23-2013, 08:22 AM
hiball3985's Avatar
hiball3985
hiball3985 is offline
Logistics Pro
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tujunga, calif
Posts: 3,758
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by jonezzzman
Yeah The video is kind of deceiving. After I left the crank sit for a minute or two I had to use both hands on the end to get it spinning. Then it would be okay until I let it sit again.
That's not unusual at all. This thread reminds me of the first rebuild it did on a 54 Chebbie 235 six in 1962 on my moms car.. It used shims on the rear main cap, don't know why GM designed it that way but I got it wrong. The engine was so tight we had to push start it at 30 mph live and learn.. Thankfully my mother is a patient person dealing with my automotive learning curve
 
  #14  
Old 08-23-2013, 10:59 AM
Freightrain's Avatar
Freightrain
Freightrain is offline
Lead Driver

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,893
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Remember to do a FULL WASH up of the block. Don't rely on the machine shop. Especially since they line honed it and the oil galleys will get full of crud from the fluid running down.
 
  #15  
Old 08-23-2013, 01:32 PM
jonezzzman's Avatar
jonezzzman
jonezzzman is offline
Mountain Pass
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Spanish Springs
Posts: 121
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The block actually looked pretty clean when I got it back. Appears they cleaned it up. The threads on one if my mains bolts got dinged. Made it a little tight, but I think it'll be fine. It's torqued and doesn't feel like its stretching or anything.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9d4
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
04-30-2013 09:12 AM
53fatfndr
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
13
05-23-2006 08:35 PM
cujo8
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
20
04-26-2006 09:17 PM
debestuss
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
5
10-03-2004 06:55 PM
drew222
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
7
04-13-2004 02:38 PM



Quick Reply: 390 Crankshaft install..feels very tight



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:42 AM.