6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

4.30 versus 3.73

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-18-2009, 12:21 PM
T.Brown's Avatar
T.Brown
T.Brown is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.30 versus 3.73

How much difference in fuel mileage between these gears? 3 or 4 mpg or more? I really like the looks of the wide trac axle,just wondering about the mileage. Thanks
 
  #2  
Old 05-18-2009, 05:13 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Get the wide track with 3.73s.
 
  #3  
Old 05-18-2009, 08:00 PM
T.Brown's Avatar
T.Brown
T.Brown is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was told it was only available with the 4.30 gears.
 
  #4  
Old 05-18-2009, 08:39 PM
dt75flh's Avatar
dt75flh
dt75flh is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Viva Las Vegas
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the difference between 3.73 and 4.10 gears is 200 rpm on the highway....4.10 to 4.30 is another 100 rpm

so with 4.30 gears your turning around 2500 rpm at 70 mph
 
  #5  
Old 05-18-2009, 09:06 PM
2x6 bulldog's Avatar
2x6 bulldog
2x6 bulldog is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by T.Brown
How much difference in fuel mileage between these gears? 3 or 4 mpg or more? I really like the looks of the wide trac axle,just wondering about the mileage. Thanks
I would say 1.5 - 2 mpg more with the 3.73. The wide track front end is phenomenal. The turning radius is fantastic!
 
  #6  
Old 05-18-2009, 09:26 PM
bookem15's Avatar
bookem15
bookem15 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: E Washington
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2x6 bulldog
I would say 1.5 - 2 mpg more with the 3.73. The wide track front end is phenomenal. The turning radius is fantastic!
can you get the wide track with 3.73's?? I thought it was only available with the 4.30's.
 
  #7  
Old 05-18-2009, 10:52 PM
powerstroke72's Avatar
powerstroke72
powerstroke72 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW Virginia
Posts: 24,308
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
You can get the Widetrack with the F-350 with 3.73 gears. In the F-450, you can only get the 4.30 gears.
 
  #8  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:35 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by T.Brown
I was told it was only available with the 4.30 gears.
If you were talking to a dealer he may have told you what he had available...not what you can order or find elsewhere.
Originally Posted by bookem15
can you get the wide track with 3.73's?? I thought it was only available with the 4.30's.
You can build a F350 on the website with 3.73s and the widetrack.
 
  #9  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:20 AM
F250Wheels's Avatar
F250Wheels
F250Wheels is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I installed 3.73 gears in my F450 and I am very happy with it.
 
  #10  
Old 05-19-2009, 03:43 PM
JohnD333's Avatar
JohnD333
JohnD333 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 773
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
F250Wheels - the 3.73 swap for your 450 sounds great for running empty or pulling a trailer a speeds greater than 60 MPH on flat ground, and a lot cheaper than an $3k overdrive for the little bit of empty running that I do. What did that swap do for your empty and towing mileages on your duelly 450? Do you pull heavy loads? I am right at 26k combined weight with my 40' high profile 5th wheel camper and wonder how/if that might work from your perspective. Pulling and stopping camper is 85% of use, and why I bought truck - which is a dream to pull with; but running empty I feel like a fuel fool.


For others, as most of you know both rear ends and tire sizes affect final RPM's. The standard 32 inch diameter tires on 19.5 rims (225/70R/19.5) that come on a 450 with a 4.30 rear has me running 2,250 engine RPM's at 70; hard to read but guess about 1,900-1,950 RPM's at 60 MPH. My 08 250 with 3.73 rear and Ford's optional 20" tires ran 1,500 RPM's at 60. My stock 450 setup is about the same RPM/final drive as a 250/350's with 4.10 with their standard smaller wheel/tire combos. So you might get the final drive ratio you want with the right tire combo.

The opposite is true for a 3.73 with 20 inch rims on a 250, equivalent to a 3.55 or so with the smaller standard tires. Most of the better mileage talk comes from those with big factory tire/wheel combos with 3.73 rear ends.

Original poster you are planning on heavy loads you might regret the 3.73 if you are near the mountains. (250Wheels response to my note to above may be helpful). Also, if you plan to pull a 5er, be careful of the height of the bed of the truck; Ford's optional tire size/off road packages can add almost 4 inches and cause pickup bed rail clearance problems on some 5th wheel campers.

JohnD333
sorry lost footer signature again
 
  #11  
Old 05-19-2009, 04:20 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I pulled my 17k 5th wheel behid 3.73s in the mountains and had no problem whatsoever. The only reason I upgraded to the F450 was because of the tongue weight on single rear wheels just didn't feel safe.
 
  #12  
Old 05-19-2009, 06:36 PM
JohnD333's Avatar
JohnD333
JohnD333 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 773
Received 93 Likes on 69 Posts
66stang351,
I got out of my 250 for the same reason - tongue weight.
Last summer I was in New Hampshire, which is a lot easier than the Rockies, and my load with 4.30 450 was no fun, but that could have been the turbo that was replaced 5k miles later.

Now that I am in a duelly I wonder if the drag of the extra wheels will negate the economy otherwise associated with a 3.73 with my wheel/tire size; thus my question to F250Wheels. From other 450 reports, I understand a $3k overdrive provides a 1.5 MPG improvement, but final drive ration was not cited. I am not sure that OD could be engaged full time with a load, but if it could the payback on $3k would be 100k highway miles at $5/gallon. A rear end swap would be lots cheaper and faster payback, so await F250Wheels' reply; and I could always do only one and swap back if I did not get the same results.
 
  #13  
Old 05-19-2009, 08:07 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JohnD333
66stang351,
I got out of my 250 for the same reason - tongue weight.
Last summer I was in New Hampshire, which is a lot easier than the Rockies, and my load with 4.30 450 was no fun, but that could have been the turbo that was replaced 5k miles later.

Now that I am in a duelly I wonder if the drag of the extra wheels will negate the economy otherwise associated with a 3.73 with my wheel/tire size; thus my question to F250Wheels. From other 450 reports, I understand a $3k overdrive provides a 1.5 MPG improvement, but final drive ration was not cited. I am not sure that OD could be engaged full time with a load, but if it could the payback on $3k would be 100k highway miles at $5/gallon. A rear end swap would be lots cheaper and faster payback, so await F250Wheels' reply; and I could always do only one and swap back if I did not get the same results.
Right after I got the heavier trailer I pulled it from California to Oregon and with the 3.73s the truck would drop a gear and pull a 6% grade at 50MPH with no problems.

As for the OD, I have a Gearvendor in my 450 and don't use it pulling as it just drops a gear in the transmission unless it is flat and level or down hill. Driving empty I went from ~14-15 up to ~16-17 cruising, and my truck is used about 90% empty. With 3.73s in the F350 60MPH was 1750RPM, with the 4.30s in the F450 it was 2000RPM and with the GV it dropped to 1500RPM. Having the GV is like having a rear end ratio in the ~3.20s.

I figured like you did that the OD would take 100k to come close to paying for itself in fuel, but in addition to fuel running the engine and transmission at 75% of the RPMs when cruising empty saves wear and tear in the long run as well.
 
  #14  
Old 05-19-2009, 08:55 PM
T.Brown's Avatar
T.Brown
T.Brown is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was told today I can get the wide trac axle with the 3.73 gear but cant get limited slip with it. Is that a real big deal, with a 4x4 truck ?Not gonna be in the mud or pulling real heavy loads.
 
  #15  
Old 05-20-2009, 12:34 AM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by T.Brown
I was told today I can get the wide trac axle with the 3.73 gear but cant get limited slip with it. Is that a real big deal, with a 4x4 truck ?Not gonna be in the mud or pulling real heavy loads.
The limited slip is relatively useless anyway...get the 3.73s.
 


Quick Reply: 4.30 versus 3.73



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:59 AM.