Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter Join Chapter, Leader: Fomoko1

Ford Eco Blast truck- would you buy over a V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-14-2008, 01:14 AM
less's Avatar
less
less is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford Eco Blast truck- would you buy over a V8

chisblassternardone: Ford F-150 Eco Boost V6

Would you go for this or the Ford V8, if you were in the market for a truck, when this becomes available ?
 
  #2  
Old 12-14-2008, 07:28 AM
Prairie Lariat's Avatar
Prairie Lariat
Prairie Lariat is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sk
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm partial to V-8's myself, especially in trucks and mustangs. I see what Ford is doing and it seems like a good idea but I still believe the technology is there to make a V-8 as fuel efficient as any other motor. (I've squeaked 32 mpg with my Cobra).
 
  #3  
Old 12-14-2008, 07:32 AM
96sherm's Avatar
96sherm
96sherm is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sask
Posts: 20,099
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i don't think i'd pay extra for it over buying the 5.4L,,, the mileage isn't that much greater than what some can get with the 5.4, and i'd suspect that a F/A gasoline engine would have a shorter lifespan than a N/A gasoline engine.

that being said, turbo whine is awesome, but so is V8 roar.... if they can find a way to keep the v6 from sounding "rice rockety", it might something to try...
 
  #4  
Old 12-14-2008, 05:10 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,681
Received 1,353 Likes on 1,112 Posts
If the price of this option drops after an intro period it might be something to consider depending or where the gas prices go.........
 
  #5  
Old 12-14-2008, 05:51 PM
Snowking's Avatar
Snowking
Snowking is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colonsay Sk. Canada
Posts: 8,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its gonna be the same story as it always goes, durability issues will arise right away followed by longevity issues. Always happens when more power is forced out of small motors.

Also torque is the main factor in a good motor. Espically in a truck. Even a 4 cyl Honda civic motor can be build to 300 horsepower, donèt think it would last too long in a pickup though.

Also did you look at 15mpg. Thats still not to impressive thats about the same of a finely tuned 390.
 
  #6  
Old 12-14-2008, 07:03 PM
Fomoko1's Avatar
Fomoko1
Fomoko1 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Posts: 89,681
Received 1,353 Likes on 1,112 Posts
Some good points Ryan.
Looking back after reading them I think I`d rather go with one of my favorites, either a 302 or better yet, the 390.
 
  #7  
Old 12-14-2008, 08:15 PM
96sherm's Avatar
96sherm
96sherm is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sask
Posts: 20,099
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
honestly, some fine tuning of the current 5.4 and 4.6's would reveal a lot more MPG's than they get currently.

fuel economy vs emissions is a crock of bullspit. on a modern engine, if you chuck the emissions garbage and tune it to run accordingly, the mpg WILL increase. i've proven it on almost every vehicle i've owned.

so, since when has it become less harmful to the environment to use up more resources in hopes of saving the planet??? we burn more fuel because of more restrictive exhausts and such, and supposedly its cleaner emissions... well, quite frankly, the smell comming from my truck's exhaust resembles rotten eggs and smells anything but clean to me. my theory??? forget emissions. take the current engines and let them breath and use less fuel. Less fuel=less emissions...
 
  #8  
Old 12-14-2008, 08:41 PM
Snowking's Avatar
Snowking
Snowking is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colonsay Sk. Canada
Posts: 8,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is 1 majior problem with your theroy Sherm, that requires thought, research showes that thought is a tribute that enviromentists like David Suzuki fail to have. Sad but true the world is full of powerful idiots.
 
  #9  
Old 12-14-2008, 09:04 PM
skidooman's Avatar
skidooman
skidooman is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Langham, SK
Posts: 2,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All good points. I wouldn't buy one of these trucks because to me torque is more important than horsepower for a truck! I love my 5.4l, it has great torque at low rpm and it's not that bad on fuel.
 
  #10  
Old 12-15-2008, 05:19 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by Snowking
Its gonna be the same story as it always goes, durability issues will arise right away followed by longevity issues. Always happens when more power is forced out of small motors.

Also torque is the main factor in a good motor. Espically in a truck. Even a 4 cyl Honda civic motor can be build to 300 horsepower, donèt think it would last too long in a pickup though.

Also did you look at 15mpg. Thats still not to impressive thats about the same of a finely tuned 390.
Excellent post Ryan. Summed up my thoughts pretty damn well!
 
  #11  
Old 12-15-2008, 05:20 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by 96sherm
honestly, some fine tuning of the current 5.4 and 4.6's would reveal a lot more MPG's than they get currently.

fuel economy vs emissions is a crock of bullspit. on a modern engine, if you chuck the emissions garbage and tune it to run accordingly, the mpg WILL increase. i've proven it on almost every vehicle i've owned.

so, since when has it become less harmful to the environment to use up more resources in hopes of saving the planet??? we burn more fuel because of more restrictive exhausts and such, and supposedly its cleaner emissions... well, quite frankly, the smell comming from my truck's exhaust resembles rotten eggs and smells anything but clean to me. my theory??? forget emissions. take the current engines and let them breath and use less fuel. Less fuel=less emissions...
Another great post! It seems like people dont actually care about emissions, they just want other people to think they do. Im with ya man, less fuel = less emissions.
 
  #12  
Old 12-15-2008, 07:06 PM
96sherm's Avatar
96sherm
96sherm is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Yorkton Sask
Posts: 20,099
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Snowking
Sad but true the world is full of powerful idiots.
possibly the best fraise i've heard this year!!! good points.
 
  #13  
Old 12-16-2008, 08:38 PM
preppypyro's Avatar
preppypyro
preppypyro is offline
FTE Legend
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Central Rural Sask.
Posts: 37,859
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Haha best fraise eh!!

I like it
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rfsdvm
2009 - 2014 F150
25
10-07-2014 11:37 AM
hammerhead90
2009 - 2014 F150
10
10-20-2010 07:16 PM
less
Manitoba / Saskatchewan Chapter
1
04-13-2010 09:51 PM



Quick Reply: Ford Eco Blast truck- would you buy over a V8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.