Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

2009 5.4L horsepower leaked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #136  
Old 05-19-2008, 07:48 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
The morons at Ford need to wake up and put the V10 in the F150...

No, I didn't read all 9 pages...
 
  #137  
Old 05-19-2008, 07:51 PM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
The morons at Ford need to wake up and put the V10 in the F150...

No, I didn't read all 9 pages...
What would the point be of having a V10 in the F-150? It weighs more then the 5.4, and still only puts out 362HP and 457 ft-lbs, and sucks down fuel, while you have 5.7L V8s putting out 380HP and 404 ft-lbs of torque that can actually manage somewhat respectable mileage
 
  #138  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:33 PM
'68EB's Avatar
'68EB
'68EB is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by builtfordtough13
"Again what i want the power for is none of your concern. I just want it and I want Ford to have the bragging rights with class leading numbers.

390 is less than Dodge, GM toyoda. I could not care less that you are happy with that."




I agree with almost everything you said, except for the GM part, the biggest engine in the Silverado 1500 is the 6.0L and it offers
Thundering 367 horsepower @ 5500 rpm
375 lb.-ft. of torque @ 4300 rpm
(Directly off the Chevy Website.)

Thanks.

I'd heard or read somewhere GM was finally going to offer the Denaly 6.2 acrost the bored.

403Hp and 420(?) torq.
 
  #139  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:37 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
builtfordtough13
builtfordtough13 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by '68EB
Thanks.

I'd heard or read somewhere GM was finally going to offer the Denaly 6.2 acrost the bored.

403Hp and 420(?) torq.
That would be interesting, hopefully Ford's 6.2 can meet or beat GM's, and put it across the board.
 
  #140  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:42 PM
'68EB's Avatar
'68EB
'68EB is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tjthegreat
why dont u try hooking ur 460 up to a 5.4 or a 5.7 tundra.......i think youll win

hooking up trucks proves nothing except who has the most traction at the moment.

i have seen videos where a little bronco 2 yanked a full size dodge around.

besides his tundra is a 4wd and my 250 ia a 2wd.


I want a new Ford but I want it to at least run like a new toyoda.

If someone else doesn;t care and wants more mpg I respect that but don't shove there values down my throat.

I just want Ford to give us the choice.
 
  #141  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:47 PM
'68EB's Avatar
'68EB
'68EB is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by builtfordtough13
That would be interesting, hopefully Ford's 6.2 can meet or beat GM's, and put it across the board.

thats my wish too (just add toyoda to that butt kicking list)
 
  #142  
Old 05-19-2008, 08:49 PM
builtfordtough13's Avatar
builtfordtough13
builtfordtough13 is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by '68EB
thats my wish too (just add toyoda to that butt kicking list)
I like the way u think.
 
  #143  
Old 05-19-2008, 09:57 PM
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Fosters is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
The morons at Ford need to wake up and put the V10 in the F150...

No, I didn't read all 9 pages...
I'd be there in a heartbeat!

Originally Posted by Lead Head
What would the point be of having a V10 in the F-150? It weighs more then the 5.4, and still only puts out 362HP and 457 ft-lbs, and sucks down fuel, while you have 5.7L V8s putting out 380HP and 404 ft-lbs of torque that can actually manage somewhat respectable mileage
head to the superduty forums and check out the mileage. the mileage difference is minimal between the two around town, and the V10 gets considerably better mileage while towing; it doesn't have to work nearly as hard. and they'd be damn near a bolt-in... and it would be an option, not everyone would have to get it, but the ones who do want it, could.

or at the very least, make a damn v10 based on the 4.6 stroke. the one off prototype in the boss 351 mustang mule was great.... I'm sure they could come up with a truck version easily.

Originally Posted by '68EB
If someone else doesn;t care and wants more mpg I respect that but don't shove there values down my throat.



I just want Ford to give us the choice.
Amen. and while we're on that subject, where's my 4.30 gears option?? that costs NOTHING extra for ford. they're differnt gears, they don't cost anything different to make a different ratio...
 
  #144  
Old 05-19-2008, 11:07 PM
'68EB's Avatar
'68EB
'68EB is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fosters
:



Amen. and while we're on that subject, where's my 4.30 gears option?? that costs NOTHING extra for ford. they're differnt gears, they don't cost anything different to make a different ratio...

My understanding is that EVERY engine combonation has to be EPA certified.

So the 4.30's would have to be tested $$$$ and then the CAFE would be effected by a few less MPG.


I cou;d see 4.30's or even lower with a double OD I think thts what the tundra does.
 
  #145  
Old 05-20-2008, 12:25 AM
Fosters's Avatar
Fosters
Fosters is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by '68EB
My understanding is that EVERY engine combonation has to be EPA certified.

So the 4.30's would have to be tested $$$$ and then the CAFE would be effected by a few less MPG.


I cou;d see 4.30's or even lower with a double OD I think thts what the tundra does.

a few less mpg?? hardly. most people notice better mpg around town and slightly less on the hwy when they up the gears on these trucks.

bad mpg usually comes from how hard the engine has to work, not as much from RPM. That was in the carb days that was a problem .

My mustang with 4.30s has gotten 28mpg phoenix to san diego....
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Christian_m__
Garage & Workshop
2
05-28-2015 07:52 AM
Scott at Superchips
Vendor Specials, Discounts, Product Announcements & Group Buys
5
03-31-2014 02:16 PM
brent1204
2009 - 2014 F150
7
02-14-2014 11:57 AM
WoeIsMe
2009 - 2014 F150
31
01-12-2014 03:37 PM



Quick Reply: 2009 5.4L horsepower leaked



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:20 AM.