4:10s and 39s?
#196
Gears Gears Gears
I run 5:38s on 40" tires. I ran 4:88s with 37" tires. If you like running in mud, I'd go as tall as you can fit. If it's standard trail riding, I would not go less than the 5:38s.
just wondering im thinking of puttting a lift kit on my 96 f 350..it has the stock 4:10 gears but it has a 460 engine in it.do yyou think with the stock gears a 460 would have the power to push the 39 inch super swampers or would i have to regear it?..its automatic not standard..thanks
#197
#198
#200
How often have you guys seen higher ratio pinions fail? Personally, I have never even met someone who saw the failure with their own eyes. Have you both seen properly installed, quality pinion gears fail? Is the STG area the Bermuda Triangle of pinion gear failures? Now I'm really curious....
#201
How often have you guys seen higher ratio pinions fail? Personally, I have never even met someone who saw the failure with their own eyes. Have you both seen properly installed, quality pinion gears fail? Is the STG area the Bermuda Triangle of pinion gear failures? Now I'm really curious....
ill take a pic of the "wall of breaks" next time im over at his house......he's broke every thing there is to break on a d60, he's since switched to rocks...
#203
this was on a d60/14b combo, welded f/r
well, he's flipped his truck 2 or 3 times i think.....
heres what it currently looks like........well, minus the stuck part...haha
what the hell, more pics from the same day......two more badass trucks......the cheby with over 900hp...
well, he's flipped his truck 2 or 3 times i think.....
heres what it currently looks like........well, minus the stuck part...haha
what the hell, more pics from the same day......two more badass trucks......the cheby with over 900hp...
#206
#207
I would be inclined to agree with OverEngineer. Ring and pinion failures are usually a result of poor set-up, or cheap gears. There is really no proof that the smaller pinion gear attributes to reliability.
Failures occur, but these failures are not directly the result of a smaller pinion gear.
Engagement and "pitch line run out" is not too different with the a deeper, or smaller pinion. This is corrected by running a larger ring gear. Actual engagement remains the same as long as the pinion itself does not flex, or the housing does not move. This is the problem with the Dana axle. Part of the reason why the holy 70, is not so great, any of them.
Extra pinion support from the 14B is where the strength is at.
Ring and pinion engineers do not give any indication, and would disagree that the smaller diameter pinion is any weaker than a larger one. Might even argue that the extra gear contact might make them stronger. Additional pinion to ring contact would provide additional strength without a larger ring gear.
I see r&p failures, as not very common, and mostly attributed to incorrect installs.
Failures occur, but these failures are not directly the result of a smaller pinion gear.
Engagement and "pitch line run out" is not too different with the a deeper, or smaller pinion. This is corrected by running a larger ring gear. Actual engagement remains the same as long as the pinion itself does not flex, or the housing does not move. This is the problem with the Dana axle. Part of the reason why the holy 70, is not so great, any of them.
Extra pinion support from the 14B is where the strength is at.
Ring and pinion engineers do not give any indication, and would disagree that the smaller diameter pinion is any weaker than a larger one. Might even argue that the extra gear contact might make them stronger. Additional pinion to ring contact would provide additional strength without a larger ring gear.
I see r&p failures, as not very common, and mostly attributed to incorrect installs.
#209
ahhh....yup......that was one of the deals as soon as you spin your done....i was riding in the white ford and he started it all, he got stuck, then batman, then the chevy.....the funny part is, that my 1wd ranger wouldn't of gotten stuck where either the chevy or batman did.....but trying to pull opie (white ford) out dug em down.....
#210
I would be inclined to agree with OverEngineer. Ring and pinion failures are usually a result of poor set-up, or cheap gears. There is really no proof that the smaller pinion gear attributes to reliability.
Failures occur, but these failures are not directly the result of a smaller pinion gear.
Engagement and "pitch line run out" is not too different with the a deeper, or smaller pinion. This is corrected by running a larger ring gear. Actual engagement remains the same as long as the pinion itself does not flex, or the housing does not move. This is the problem with the Dana axle. Part of the reason why the holy 70, is not so great, any of them.
Extra pinion support from the 14B is where the strength is at.
Ring and pinion engineers do not give any indication, and would disagree that the smaller diameter pinion is any weaker than a larger one. Might even argue that the extra gear contact might make them stronger. Additional pinion to ring contact would provide additional strength without a larger ring gear.
I see r&p failures, as not very common, and mostly attributed to incorrect installs.
Failures occur, but these failures are not directly the result of a smaller pinion gear.
Engagement and "pitch line run out" is not too different with the a deeper, or smaller pinion. This is corrected by running a larger ring gear. Actual engagement remains the same as long as the pinion itself does not flex, or the housing does not move. This is the problem with the Dana axle. Part of the reason why the holy 70, is not so great, any of them.
Extra pinion support from the 14B is where the strength is at.
Ring and pinion engineers do not give any indication, and would disagree that the smaller diameter pinion is any weaker than a larger one. Might even argue that the extra gear contact might make them stronger. Additional pinion to ring contact would provide additional strength without a larger ring gear.
I see r&p failures, as not very common, and mostly attributed to incorrect installs.