6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

cold air intake....loss of mpg?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 03-19-2008, 02:20 AM
Fordflanigan's Avatar
Fordflanigan
Fordflanigan is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cen, CA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
cold air intake....loss of mpg?????

hey guys, i got my new powerstroke last week and put a k&n intake on it as well as 2 1/2inch coil spacers. Since then ive LOST about 3 mpg. Is this normal for an air intake to lose mpgs? or could it be the coil spacers messing up the aerodynamics of the truck?
 
  #2  
Old 03-19-2008, 06:22 AM
bismic's Avatar
bismic
bismic is online now
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 26,008
Received 2,460 Likes on 1,702 Posts
The K&N does not filter as well and you get NO benefit from it. These trucks need to get to 500 hp or so before you can benefit from extra air.

I'll track down a study done that showed the poor K&N performance against a OEM General Motors filtration system. It is very applicable to Fords also since the Donaldson (OEM) Ford filter is one of the best at filtering. It is just a PIA to change, but there are tricks to make it easier and most don't need to change it for 50,000 miles or more. Ford states it will hold 3 lbs of dirt.

There are a few people that will say they got a little better mpg w/ an air intake. Many, many more people that are saying it offers no benefit and will probably let more dirt pass through.

Here is the link:
http://www.nicoclub.com/articles.php?id=180100
 
  #3  
Old 03-19-2008, 01:56 PM
Fordflanigan's Avatar
Fordflanigan
Fordflanigan is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cen, CA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
dang that sucks! looks like ill probably be putting my airbox back on. wut a pain :/
Thanks for the info mark!
 
  #4  
Old 03-20-2008, 09:47 AM
wwb's Avatar
wwb
wwb is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fordflanigan
......or could it be the coil spacers messing up the aerodynamics of the truck?
Yup.

Unless you're into SERIOUS off-roading, put your truck back down; you've already got enough ground clearance that you can go under it on a creeper without jackstands. Screw the "cool" factor. When you get 'em standing higher that stock, you've totally messed up the intended handling characteristics. Also, they're much more prone to rollover with a higher CG, and they generally wear tires much faster.

If you're a new F250 owner, you should know up front that CHEAP tires are $150 each, and it's easy to go well over $200 per tire. Kinda makes you want to make 'em last a little longer.

Plus, diesel here just hit $4.19...... getting good mileage is becoming a serious concern.
 
  #5  
Old 03-20-2008, 11:06 AM
BowTieHatr's Avatar
BowTieHatr
BowTieHatr is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence,SC
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
it could be a little of both. the maf coul be getting thrown off by the filter or even the oil on the element could have damaged the sensor. stock filters are the best option for this truck like bismic said. the k&n filter does flow more air, but for a turbo application, more air means more dust due to lack of filtration. there are some very good aftermarket filters which filter almost the same as the stock box, but the stock filter can hold up to 5 pounds of dirt and no aftermarket can.
 
  #6  
Old 03-20-2008, 04:12 PM
southbound35west's Avatar
southbound35west
southbound35west is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: north texas
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K&N is junk i sent mine back for a full refund after running there system for about 10K miles................it dusted my turbo real good............so i immeadiatly put the stocker back on, flow plenty of air for me and filters well to!
 
  #7  
Old 03-20-2008, 04:55 PM
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
duffman77 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An air intake that flows more can not cost you MPG, its your coil spacers for sure.
 
  #8  
Old 03-20-2008, 05:37 PM
unrulee's Avatar
unrulee
unrulee is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Coal Country, ND
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wwb
When you get 'em standing higher that stock, you've totally messed up the intended handling characteristics. Also, they're much more prone to rollover with a higher CG, and they generally wear tires much faster.


You had me untill "they generaly wear tires much faster". \

I'll agree if you just slap the lift in there and don't get the alignment checked.

Other than that there will be no ill effects on tire wear due to a lifted suspension .

And yeah, don't expect a lifted truck to handle the same as a stocker!!!!
 
  #9  
Old 03-21-2008, 06:55 AM
BowTieHatr's Avatar
BowTieHatr
BowTieHatr is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence,SC
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by duffman77
An air intake that flows more can not cost you MPG, its your coil spacers for sure.
you figured this out how?
 
  #10  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:29 AM
69cj's Avatar
69cj
69cj is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Middle Tn.
Posts: 13,827
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
K&N filters use oil on their elements and the maf sensor does not like oil which can equal worse mileage!!
 
  #11  
Old 03-21-2008, 09:25 AM
wwb's Avatar
wwb
wwb is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=unrulee]......I'll agree if you just slap the lift in there and don't get the alignment checked. ......QUOTE]

Agreed. The original poster, though, mentioned "coil spacers".... leading me to suspect he stuck 'em in and called it a done deal.

Camber, caster and toe all need to be reset with a change in ride height on a control-arm front end. If it's not done, tire wear will be adversely affected.
 
  #12  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:11 PM
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
duffman77 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BowTieHatr
you figured this out how?
Excess oxygen gives a more complete burn, so if he truly has more flow it should be more efficient and not less. Also the engine uses less effort to pull air into the engine when there is less restriction.

With my original statement I am giving the OP some credit that he did not come on here complaining about a 3 MPG loss and wasnt smart enough to see the check engine light come on becuase its gummed up a sensor or forget to mention huge changes in drivability from the same as well. The OP also said 1 week, a filter would literally have to be dripping oil to foul the sensor in one week. Lifts are known to foul aerodynamics and someone elses hypothesis about a misalignment fit the bill given the info provided.
 
  #13  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:33 PM
BowTieHatr's Avatar
BowTieHatr
BowTieHatr is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florence,SC
Posts: 2,725
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by duffman77
Excess oxygen gives a more complete
more air is lean, which means truck runs hotter, which means bordering on detonation/piston melting. diesels dont have to work to pull in air. they will do it no matter what you do, ever tried to stop a runaway????
 
  #14  
Old 03-21-2008, 03:40 PM
duffman77's Avatar
duffman77
duffman77 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 804
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heat is good, heat is what makes the engine run and run efficiently at that, I dont think a diesel can be too lean, there around 80:1 A/F ratio at idle.

Just because a diesel is unthrottled does not mean that there is no energy expended to pump air in and out of the engine.
 
  #15  
Old 03-21-2008, 04:17 PM
OZX1's Avatar
OZX1
OZX1 is offline
Posting Guru

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SoCal, SD CO. East
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Don't think like the driver of a gasser...

Originally Posted by Fordflanigan
hey guys, i got my new powerstroke last week and put a k&n intake on it as well as 2 1/2inch coil spacers. Since then ive LOST about 3 mpg. Is this normal for an air intake to lose mpgs? or could it be the coil spacers messing up the aerodynamics of the truck?
Welcome to the forum! There's a lot of very good people in here, some of whom you've already heard from.

If this is your first diesel, everything is different now... If this is a subsequent diesel but your first Powerstroke, many things are different now.

Do a lot of reading and ask questions BEFORE you drop another dime on mods... For the most part, we've made the mistakes already for you.

Blessings-

Brian
aka
 


Quick Reply: cold air intake....loss of mpg?????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:34 PM.