Opinions of our govenour
#76
All I can see Lenny is it looks like you were just looking for a fight.
It's laughable that you put your opinion on legal matters above those of a veteran lawmaker, I don't care what you think of his politics.
It's laughable that you put your opinion on legal matters above those of a veteran lawmaker, I don't care what you think of his politics.
#77
i came late to this Bruce....i was at my moms.. sicker than 3 dogs when most of this transpired and was posted about.
as to legal...my 20 yrs of either executive member or committee member of my local of AFoL-CIA on legal committees and NYS steering units of the union made me study law and research before i just shoot out an opinion link. i'm not saying i could pass the bar but i do know the basics and have made a ton of contacts in NY enforcement, prosecution, judicial....
you're in Nevada, i'm in NY and Ron Paul wouldn't know Andrew Cuomo from Alan Hevesi, Joe Bruno from Carl McCall, Geo. Pataki from Sheldon Silver.
And i will match NY st law straight up with RP any day as long as i have time to prepare. he may be a "veteran lawmaker" but in my book that makes him easy.
last, but not least, you called a member names. that always tourqes me. i have never called a member a name. i'll point out wrongs but i've never called you a name like "idiot"....i challange you to find anytime i've called anyone a derogatory name in debate EVER.
as to legal...my 20 yrs of either executive member or committee member of my local of AFoL-CIA on legal committees and NYS steering units of the union made me study law and research before i just shoot out an opinion link. i'm not saying i could pass the bar but i do know the basics and have made a ton of contacts in NY enforcement, prosecution, judicial....
you're in Nevada, i'm in NY and Ron Paul wouldn't know Andrew Cuomo from Alan Hevesi, Joe Bruno from Carl McCall, Geo. Pataki from Sheldon Silver.
And i will match NY st law straight up with RP any day as long as i have time to prepare. he may be a "veteran lawmaker" but in my book that makes him easy.
last, but not least, you called a member names. that always tourqes me. i have never called a member a name. i'll point out wrongs but i've never called you a name like "idiot"....i challange you to find anytime i've called anyone a derogatory name in debate EVER.
#80
Originally Posted by lenny1carl
It's about time you realized that.
Sorry you were sick!
#81
Originally Posted by Bdox
All I can see Lenny is it looks like you were just looking for a fight.
Originally Posted by Bdox
It's laughable that you put your opinion on legal matters above those of a veteran lawmaker,
Originally Posted by Bdox
I don't care what you think of his politics.
Later...
Brewster...
P.S. Oh yeah, I forgot, liberals don't think that Socialism is Communism. Kind of like Red vs. White in the early Twentieth Century. [Look it up...]
#82
I see your are trying out for the part of the "Most Offensive Jerk In History." Good luck with that, I'd say you have a good chance of getting the part! Congratulations!
#83
He' going to have a tough time wrestling that honor away from you.
Originally Posted by Bdox
I see your are trying out for the part of the "Most Offensive Jerk In History." Good luck with that, I'd say you have a good chance of getting the part! Congratulations!
#84
Aren't we getting off track on the original subject? Spitzer is gone, we have a new gov. let's move on................
#85
Spitz's is gone, and our new Gov already aired his dirty laundry. Which did not surprise me of any politico.. Everyone is "Doing" someone once they get into office.
The one part about Spitz's ability I did like was giving Bruno and Silver a kick in the rear end. Those two clowns are a disgrace, and part of the reason not much gets done for the people...as both of them are to busy kissing butts of special interests and future donors to their getting re-elected.
What amazes me to no end? The amount of people that always say they are all "dirty" and need to be replaced---and the same ones that are that 'dirty'? Always manage to get re-elected over and over. Basically the ones screaming about how bad the system is? Either they do not vote---or can't find anyone to bring forth to give us better options.
Besides...even with these "upstate" plans everyone is talking about? Does anyone really think it's going to happen full force? Or will the NYC area once again suck the blood from the upstate areas as in the past.
S-
The one part about Spitz's ability I did like was giving Bruno and Silver a kick in the rear end. Those two clowns are a disgrace, and part of the reason not much gets done for the people...as both of them are to busy kissing butts of special interests and future donors to their getting re-elected.
What amazes me to no end? The amount of people that always say they are all "dirty" and need to be replaced---and the same ones that are that 'dirty'? Always manage to get re-elected over and over. Basically the ones screaming about how bad the system is? Either they do not vote---or can't find anyone to bring forth to give us better options.
Besides...even with these "upstate" plans everyone is talking about? Does anyone really think it's going to happen full force? Or will the NYC area once again suck the blood from the upstate areas as in the past.
S-
#86
Originally Posted by dryfly
He' going to have a tough time wrestling that honor away from you.
#87
Originally Posted by Bdox
I think that Ron Paul has some very important things to say on the subject of Spitzer!
http://rense.com/general81/paul.htm
http://rense.com/general81/paul.htm
For instance:
(Ron Paul)
"For government to entice a citizen to break a law with a sting operation-that is, by engaging in activities that a private citizen is prohibited by law from doing is unconscionable and should clearly be illegal"
(End Quote)
What the hell is he talking about, and who is the private citizen enticed into breaking a law, and what in the hell does this have to do with Spitzer?
#88
Originally Posted by Bdox
But even if the guy was guilty, they used illegal tactics to catch him.
Originally Posted by Bdox
The irony of it all is that he had used the same kind of tatics on others so there is a poetic justice to it all.
There's probably a special place in Hell for Spitzer.....And that arrogant smirk on his egg-sucking face while he made his "I was caught" speech said volumes.
Originally Posted by Bdox
So Spitzer did the deed. That's one. He was caught by illegal means. Thats two.
Originally Posted by Bdox
He would not be important if he had not used the same illegal tactics to bring down others. Thats three. Does one wrong add up to a right? How about two? No? Then does three wrongs make a right? No, it just makes three wrongs! Should we have a government that operates by doing wrongs? I don't think so.
Originally Posted by Bdox
The only thing that bothers me is who's money was he spending?
Originally Posted by Bdox
When we have the answer to that question, I will know if the wrong that he did is anything that I would care about.
#90
Originally Posted by Bdox
This is odd. I never had a dog in this fight about Spitzer.
Originally Posted by Bdox
What was evidently not called into question is that there are "policies" in place that set the investigation in motion which are outside of legal requirements.
Originally Posted by Bdox
I hinted at that earlier and you guys go off on me as if you thing I am defending Spitzer.
Now......I don't mind it directed at me (which it has been in the past)....But PLEASE....Don't belittle your position as official 'winked-at, and encouraged, FTE baiter' (i.e......Calling people 'son').....by putting on angel wings and talking about guys going off on 'poor, little old' you because of some perception of you defending Spitzer!
p.s. This is the NEW YORK chapter......Not Club FTE.....Show a little respect!