96' 4.6 Mustang engine into a 97' f150

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-12-2008, 07:46 AM
CharlieMaxwell's Avatar
CharlieMaxwell
CharlieMaxwell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
96' 4.6 Mustang engine into a 97' f150

Hi all. This is my first post. My step son has a 97' F150 with a ceased up 4.6l engine in it. I found a 96' 4.6 Mustang engine that I would like to swap. What I thought I would do would be to place both engines on engine stands and swap everything that is different such as intake manifold, flywheel (going from a standard transmission in the Mustang to an automatic transmission in the F150), and all the sensors. In theory, this should be all I have to do. Has anyone here actually done such an engine swap? If so, are there any troubling areas that I have overlooked? Thanks in advance!
 
  #2  
Old 01-13-2008, 06:44 AM
Bobby82490's Avatar
Bobby82490
Bobby82490 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: N. Fort Myers,FL
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wont like the way it drives with the mustang motor. The mustang 4.6s are meant to rev out and make horsepower, while the truck motor is meant to make torque.
Im not sure what the difference internally between the 2 are, but if you swapped out the car cam with the truck cam it might make it better.
 
  #3  
Old 01-13-2008, 09:12 AM
CharlieMaxwell's Avatar
CharlieMaxwell
CharlieMaxwell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, you're right. The Mustang cams are designed for top end horsepower where the truck cams are designed for low end torque. However, since this truck isn't used for towing, I don't think it will become a huge issue. If we had the cam timing tool for this engine, we would consider making the swap. Since we don't, we're better off leaving it the way it is.

We've got the Mustang engine on the stand already and should have the truck engine out of the truck sometime this afternoon. So far, we've had more problems keeping everyone focused on the job at hand than anything else. It's all good though. Who would think that an engine swap would turn into the family reunion. We have 4 generations helping to pull this engine.
 
  #4  
Old 01-13-2008, 11:21 AM
galaxie641's Avatar
galaxie641
galaxie641 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Wyoming
Posts: 4,517
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Depending on which versions they are there are some differences, too many to list but here is the site that lists all differences up to around '00:

http://www.babcox.com/editorial/ar/eb40228.htm
 
  #5  
Old 01-14-2008, 04:09 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Welcome to the forum

They are the same internally. It is compter tuning, intake runner length and exhaust that change the rpm range, they even have the same cams. As long as the truck had a Romeo built engine they will interchange. The Romeo engines have 6 flywheel bolts and the Windsors have 8.
 
  #6  
Old 01-20-2008, 01:07 AM
CharlieMaxwell's Avatar
CharlieMaxwell
CharlieMaxwell is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6 bolt flywheel flange on both.

However, as we progressed through the project, we found many little things were different between the engines. The one we took out had a knock sensor and a temperature sensor on the inside of the head under the intake. The new engine didn't. The oil pressure sensors were different. The timing covers were different. We were able to work around most of these issues, but there are a few things that have us puzzled.

The engine runs strong but it doesn't idle. We're going to look for a vacume line or a sensor we may have missed in the morning. Beyond that, I'm not sure what to look for and wonder if the idle problem is related to the sensors that this engine doesn't have that the other one did. We swapped over everything that we could, but the mustang engine wasn't machined to accept the knock sensor or the temperature sensor in the head.

Anyway, I'm open to ideas on what might correct this problem.

Thanks in advance.
 
  #7  
Old 01-21-2008, 12:20 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
The temp sensor in the head is for the temp gauge in the dash. If nothing else, remove the sensor from the old head and plug it into the harness. This way it will show the PCM something. Do the same with the knock sensor.
Make sure the IAC is plugged in anddouble check your vacuum lines, especially the PCV line into the rear of the intake.
 
  #8  
Old 04-21-2019, 10:20 AM
Bryan Bussell's Avatar
Bryan Bussell
Bryan Bussell is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try changing the heads

Originally Posted by CharlieMaxwell
6 bolt flywheel flange on both.

However, as we progressed through the project, we found many little things were different between the engines. The one we took out had a knock sensor and a temperature sensor on the inside of the head under the intake. The new engine didn't. The oil pressure sensors were different. The timing covers were different. We were able to work around most of these issues, but there are a few things that have us puzzled.

The engine runs strong but it doesn't idle. We're going to look for a vacume line or a sensor we may have missed in the morning. Beyond that, I'm not sure what to look for and wonder if the idle problem is related to the sensors that this engine doesn't have that the other one did. We swapped over everything that we could, but the mustang engine wasn't machined to accept the knock sensor or the temperature sensor in the head.

Anyway, I'm open to ideas on what might correct this problem.

Thanks in advance.
try swapping the heads use the block
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
memphis_made
1997 - 2003 F150
2
12-05-2014 07:42 AM
crmann66
Modular V8 (4.6L, 5.4L)
5
12-18-2008 05:02 PM
hitechredneck
1997 - 2003 F150
2
04-12-2007 04:24 PM
z 97ford1
1997 - 2003 F150
4
07-06-2006 08:42 AM
racerdon
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
12-21-2003 12:09 PM



Quick Reply: 96' 4.6 Mustang engine into a 97' f150



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.