Toyota Tundra woes “shame” automaker
#361
Honestly, that's all the response you warranted.
But, I have this too.
Ford, GM, and Chrysler produce/purchase 80% of all US auto parts ($171 billion in 2005), provide 7 million indirect jobs and spend $16,900,000,000 in R&D, which is more than any other industry.
http://www.weberchevrolet.com/sale/american.pdf
Versus the Japanese manufacturers who have purchased $48.8 billion in auto parts from U.S. parts manufacturers.
Japan's Automobile Manufacturers — A New American Dynamic. JAMA Brochures.
But facts don't count for much around here.
But, I have this too.
Ford, GM, and Chrysler produce/purchase 80% of all US auto parts ($171 billion in 2005), provide 7 million indirect jobs and spend $16,900,000,000 in R&D, which is more than any other industry.
http://www.weberchevrolet.com/sale/american.pdf
Versus the Japanese manufacturers who have purchased $48.8 billion in auto parts from U.S. parts manufacturers.
Japan's Automobile Manufacturers — A New American Dynamic. JAMA Brochures.
But facts don't count for much around here.
#362
Honestly, that's all the response you warrated.
But, I have this too.
Ford, GM, and Chrysler produce/purchase 80% of all US auto parts ($171 billion in 2005), provide 7 million indirect jobs and spend $16,900,000,000 in R&D, which is more than any other industry.
http://www.weberchevrolet.com/sale/american.pdf
Versus the Japanese manufacturers who have purchased $48.8 billion in auto parts from U.S. parts manufacturers.
Japan's Automobile Manufacturers — A New American Dynamic. JAMA Brochures.
But facts don't count for much around here.
But, I have this too.
Ford, GM, and Chrysler produce/purchase 80% of all US auto parts ($171 billion in 2005), provide 7 million indirect jobs and spend $16,900,000,000 in R&D, which is more than any other industry.
http://www.weberchevrolet.com/sale/american.pdf
Versus the Japanese manufacturers who have purchased $48.8 billion in auto parts from U.S. parts manufacturers.
Japan's Automobile Manufacturers — A New American Dynamic. JAMA Brochures.
But facts don't count for much around here.
Look, you said in post #349, "Try a new post, as your post has already been refuted by facts."
You were incorrect, as proven in (my) post #358.
But hey, thanks for the great info anyway....
#363
"That's IT?......That's all you got???"
Let's do a quick recap to see if I am incorrect, shall we?
Originally Posted by RocketScience
Toyota takes some of their profits and builds factories here in the US, creating thousands of American jobs. While Ford on the otherhand, takes some of their profits, and builds factories in Mexico, creating thousands of Mexican jobs, all, while closing plants here in the US.
http://www.weberchevrolet.com/sale/american.pdf
and this:
http://www.levelfieldinstitute.org/f...d_v_Toyota.pdf
and this:
Originally Posted by Big Bad
Ford, GM, and Chrysler produce/purchase 80% of all US auto parts ($171 billion in 2005), provide 7 million indirect jobs and spend $16,900,000,000 in R&D, which is more than any other industry.
Originally Posted by RocketScience
"Toyota takes some of their profits and builds factories here in the US, creating thousands of American jobs..."
Fact #1
Fact #1
That leaves Toyota with 4 U.S. plants total. Already addressed.
"....While Ford on the otherhand, takes some of their profits, and builds factories in Mexico, creating thousands of Mexican jobs...."
"....and ONLY supported the "Big Three" (oops, I guess that's the "big Two" now)?..."
"...So now , in the interim, in order for me to be patriotic and support American workers and the American economy, I drive an American-made Toyota (made in California)..."
Fact #5
Fact #5
"...my import Super Duty (made in Mexico)..."
"...and only drive my import Super Duty when my friends aren't looking."
Fact #7
Fact #7
Now, let's go back to what I said for a second:
Originally Posted by Big Bad
Absolutely pathetic. This post contains nothing but "facts" that have either been recently adressed or are irrelevant in context to the discussion at hand.
#364
Boy, you just ain't gettin' it, are you?...
This little debate you and I got going here (as silly as it is) isn't about whether or not comments stated in my post (#344) had "no relevance" or had been "already addressed" with regards to the thread topic, it was about YOU refuting the facts in post #344. Here is your response to post #344 again, in case you forgot:In post #358, I proved to you (line by line) that my comments in post #344 were indeed supported by facts, and based solely on your statement above, as it relates to said post, you were incorrect, and still are.
This little debate you and I got going here (as silly as it is) isn't about whether or not comments stated in my post (#344) had "no relevance" or had been "already addressed" with regards to the thread topic, it was about YOU refuting the facts in post #344. Here is your response to post #344 again, in case you forgot:In post #358, I proved to you (line by line) that my comments in post #344 were indeed supported by facts, and based solely on your statement above, as it relates to said post, you were incorrect, and still are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Torky2
Escape & Escape Hybrid
1
04-08-2015 07:39 AM
Octane
General Automotive Discussion
34
04-14-2008 05:14 PM