2007 Regular Cab 4x4

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 15, 2007 | 04:51 AM

Fordteamone

Thread Starter

Senior User

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 247

Likes: 0

From: Concrete WA

2007 Regular Cab 4x4

Found a 2007 XL Ranger Regular Cab 4x4 with 3.0l v-6, manual, low miles. I agree the 4.0l is the way to go but I really like the Regular cab, this is actually the only one I have found. I tow nothing and only haul camping gear for me and my dog. Is the 3.0l really a bad set up? Thanks all at FTE.

Nov 15, 2007 | 06:22 AM

arkitekt1

Junior User

Joined: Jul 2004

Posts: 84

Likes: 0

The 3.0L/manual is a good setup for what you're going to do with the truck. I had a '98 4x4 with that setup and I was very pleased with it. Change the fliuds and filters regularly and you'll get a lot of miles out of it.

Nov 15, 2007 | 06:46 AM

sfcwoodret

Posting Guru

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 1,337

Likes: 1

For what you are going to do, a 2.3 would have done the job too except they don't put them in the 4x4s.

Nov 15, 2007 | 10:31 AM

rangerfan

Posting Guru

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,958

Likes: 0

From: Southeastern Indiana

I have a 3.0 with a 4.10 rear end and I have no complaints.

Nov 15, 2007 | 01:03 PM

buttaluv

New User

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 12

Likes: 0

man, I went out to price one and I just opted for the xl version,3.0, auto and 4x4 and shoot it was over 20 grand...wow! it's been awhile since I priced a new one, but I don't even think so....

Nov 16, 2007 | 01:49 AM

Fordteamone

Thread Starter

Senior User

Joined: Apr 2005

Posts: 247

Likes: 0

From: Concrete WA

Thank all for the comments. The 2007 Regular Cab XL 4X4 I found on a specialty lot has 2100 miles, I will try to find history as to why so low of miles and then traded. Thanks again.

Edit to add they want $12900 for it was at $13995.