1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage

4.6L for towing a car trailer??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-07-2007, 10:44 AM
CJK440's Avatar
CJK440
CJK440 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.6L for towing a car trailer??

I own a 5.9L Dodge 2500 to tow a 7500 lb enclosed race trailer but I have since sold the enclosed and have an open. I hate the Dodge and it will soon be sold off to buy a 97-03 Ford. The total loaded trailer weight will between 4500 and 5000 lbs.

I will tow about 6-8 times a year, mostly 2 hours one way but other times much further.

With gas prices and my limited towing use, would a 2wd 4.6L truck be adequate??

I am sure a 5.4L will do the job better at the expense of more fuel all the time.

What say you??
 
  #2  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:18 AM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Get the 5.4 for sure. It has more power and the MPG isn't much worse. Make sure you get a truck with 3.73 gears instead of 3.55s.

With my 5.4 I've gotten up to 20MPG empty on the highway.

Mike
 
  #3  
Old 11-07-2007, 11:32 AM
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Big Bad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4.6 will do it, the 5.4 will do it better.

Unless you live in a mountainous area, the 4.6 will handle it easily IMO.
 
  #4  
Old 11-07-2007, 12:04 PM
CJK440's Avatar
CJK440
CJK440 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aside from more displacement, what other benefits come with the 5.4L?? IIRC my old 97 5.4L F-150 had a 9 3/4 rear axle. Would the 4.6 have a smaller rear??
 
  #5  
Old 11-07-2007, 12:06 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, the 4.6 gets the 8.8 rear instead of the 9.75.

Plus if you haven't kept up, the 5.4 got a bump to 260HP and 350ft/lbs in 99 so that widens the power gap between the 4.6 and 5.4.

Mike
 
  #6  
Old 11-07-2007, 12:15 PM
ATC Crazy's Avatar
ATC Crazy
ATC Crazy is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SW VA
Posts: 10,860
Received 2,708 Likes on 1,318 Posts
Towing a car trailer with a 4.6L?

Good luck...mine barely pulls around my empty truck...
 
  #7  
Old 11-07-2007, 12:17 PM
Big Bad's Avatar
Big Bad
Big Bad is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 4.6 pulls loads in that range well.

PI heads and cams must have made a difference.
 
  #8  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:19 PM
67nukeford's Avatar
67nukeford
67nukeford is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Omaha/Elkhorn, NE
Posts: 207,700
Received 221 Likes on 180 Posts
Go with the 5.4. I have the 4.6 in my '97, and while it gets good mileage, even at 187,000, it just doesn't have the power to tow. I have a 4,000lb boat, and the 4.6 really, REALLY struggles with it. My wife has a 5.4 in her 2000 Expedition, and it pulls it with ease. Uses lots of gas while pulling, though! That's why I bought the SD.
 
  #9  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:32 PM
rsylvstr's Avatar
rsylvstr
rsylvstr is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Central NY
Posts: 3,456
Received 25 Likes on 21 Posts
from what i understand, the 4.6 (when not towing) only gets about 2 MPG more than my 5.4L....then again, i have 3.55s
 
  #10  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:41 PM
skilife17's Avatar
skilife17
skilife17 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cottage Grove, Minnesota
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big Bad
My 4.6 pulls loads in that range well.

PI heads and cams must have made a difference.
Mine also pulls well in that same range. Maybe a little higher, I have pulled 6000# with my 4.6.

I don't even have PI heads or cams since mine is a 97.
 
  #11  
Old 11-07-2007, 02:48 PM
ajbeiler's Avatar
ajbeiler
ajbeiler is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lima Ohio for college
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you might get 2 more miles on the gallon if you dont put you foot in it to much when pulling get a 5.4 hands down. 4.6 can do it with a few mods like mine it nicer than a 5.4 stock. but i miss my 7.3 back home in wv. o well only one more year of school in ohio. i have pulled some heavy heavy loads with mine guess thats why my 8.8 LS is worn out. if anyone knows where a 9.75 rear axle is with 3.55 great PM me asap thank. o and if you have mountain around where you live towing or not get a 5.4 so just get a 5.4. the only reason i got a 4.6 for the 5 speed guess its not all that bad but i still wish i had a 5.4 all the time. i got the truck new in feb 97 and i now have 183,000 miles on her she has been a good truck can't complain i guess
 
  #12  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:21 PM
Bluegrass 7's Avatar
Bluegrass 7
Bluegrass 7 is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,806
Likes: 0
Received 93 Likes on 74 Posts
If your towing will be limited, I would go with the 4.6 and a set of 3.73 gears.
Once you get a 5.4 you have it full time.
I tow as much as 12,000 lbs gross combined weight with an 02 4.6 and 3.55 gears.
It handles it with enough power to be reasonable.
The 5.4 will only make a little difference on the hills but like mentioned, you have it full time, otherwise.
Fuel mileage at these weights is about 10 or less depending on the terrain and gas quality.
Large trans cooler is in order as well as watch the cooling system in hot weather.
 
  #13  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:32 PM
Dustin1690's Avatar
Dustin1690
Dustin1690 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Posts: 12,281
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I agree with bluegrass about the limited towing etc the 4.6l will do it but like many say the 5.4l will do it better and get about the same mpg
 
  #14  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:12 PM
superdutymj's Avatar
superdutymj
superdutymj is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: La Crosse, Kansas
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
get a 5.4L, you will be happier. The 4.6 is sluggish at best, without a trailer. The "2 mpg" you'll save at the pump will vanish the moment you hook up a trailer to your rig. I know the 4.6L is much cheaper than a 5.4L, much of this is due to the fact that the 4.6L is undesireable to most. The 4.6 will pull your trailer down the road, but you'll be flogging it the whole way.
 
  #15  
Old 11-08-2007, 07:55 AM
avator's Avatar
avator
avator is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Republic of TEXAS
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by superdutymj
get a 5.4L, you will be happier. The 4.6 is sluggish at best, without a trailer. The "2 mpg" you'll save at the pump will vanish the moment you hook up a trailer to your rig. I know the 4.6L is much cheaper than a 5.4L, much of this is due to the fact that the 4.6L is undesireable to most. The 4.6 will pull your trailer down the road, but you'll be flogging it the whole way.
funny how some 4.6s are sluggish, and some really shine... I'm lucky - I've got a shiner!

I realize I'm not towing the world here.... only my 3200 pound TT - but my 4.6 with 3.08 and 285 tires does great. HOWEVER, the caveat is I do it in Southeast Texas... no hills to speak of, and certainly no mountains.... but lots of 65-70 MPH highway towing.

I didn't search out this truck. I bought it from a friend, who was in financial trouble. if I had really wanted a truck - I would have gotten one with the biggest motor available, and the tallest gears.

good luck with your choice.
 


Quick Reply: 4.6L for towing a car trailer??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.