1997 F150 Manual Locking Hubs?
#1
#2
#3
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
You can't. There is no such thing since these trucks don't have hubs. The axle shafts are directly connected to the wheel, and the 4WD disengauges at the front differential...not the wheels.
Yep. I wanted to do the same thing on mine, but it couldn't be done.
#5
#6
I believe you'll find that "the 4WD disengauges at the" TRANSFER CASE.
The front: hubs, axles, differential & drive shaft spin whenever moving. The transfer case, located behind the tranny, engages & disengages the front drive shaft for 4WD shifts.
IMO an attempt to convert to "Manual Locking Hubs" would likely be extremely costly custom work. FORD's driven front axle is a bit unique, unlike the decades when Dana owned most of 4X4 front ends & WARN fed their aftermarket.
Originally Posted by ATC Crazy
the 4WD disengauges at the front differential
IMO an attempt to convert to "Manual Locking Hubs" would likely be extremely costly custom work. FORD's driven front axle is a bit unique, unlike the decades when Dana owned most of 4X4 front ends & WARN fed their aftermarket.
Last edited by Club Wagon; 10-29-2007 at 01:11 PM.
#7
Not to contradict you Club Wagon. But for further clarification. There are two locations disconnected with 2wd. In the transfer case as mentioned, and in the front axle pass side. The drivers side does drive into the carrier, but since the pass axle turn freely, the spiders gears spin instead of the driveshaft. Now if a limited slip type diff was installed it would turn all front pieces. Including the driveshaft and the chain in the transfer case. (Very noisy and vibrates a LOT)
Regardless, Costly Custom Work sums it up.
duggyb
I looked into this as well last spring as well. The problem is the splined connection between the hub and the axle. And the axle nut to hold it all together. The hub would need machined out large enought to accept the locking mech. I converted a pathfinder without issue in the past, though had a much different design.
If you find a combination of parts that could work, let us all know.
Regardless, Costly Custom Work sums it up.
duggyb
I looked into this as well last spring as well. The problem is the splined connection between the hub and the axle. And the axle nut to hold it all together. The hub would need machined out large enought to accept the locking mech. I converted a pathfinder without issue in the past, though had a much different design.
If you find a combination of parts that could work, let us all know.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Club Wagon
I believe you'll find that "the 4WD disengauges at the" TRANSFER CASE.
The front: hubs, axles, differential & drive shaft spin whenever moving. The transfer case, located behind the tranny, engages & disengages the front drive shaft for 4WD shifts.
IMO an attempt to convert to "Manual Locking Hubs" would likely be extremely costly custom work. FORD's driven front axle is a bit unique, unlike the decades when Dana owned most of 4X4 front ends & WARN fed their aftermarket.
The front: hubs, axles, differential & drive shaft spin whenever moving. The transfer case, located behind the tranny, engages & disengages the front drive shaft for 4WD shifts.
IMO an attempt to convert to "Manual Locking Hubs" would likely be extremely costly custom work. FORD's driven front axle is a bit unique, unlike the decades when Dana owned most of 4X4 front ends & WARN fed their aftermarket.
#10
#11
And sadly this is all in the Ford hub design which has little to do with the IFS.
It has to do with everything. Bigun72 has a point, simple is the solid axle foundation. Going to the A arm/wishbone set up was just to make the truck feel/handle more like a car. Granted it is way better than TTB, but a solid front end combined with manual hubs is a stronger, more reliable set up.
I am glad to see it in the larger trucks from the factory. I think solid axles should be on the F150 too, but that is just me.
Technology/marketing sells trucks, leaving us with complicated hardware for us to wonder if it will handle the use and abuse that we subject our trucks to. just my opinion.
It has to do with everything. Bigun72 has a point, simple is the solid axle foundation. Going to the A arm/wishbone set up was just to make the truck feel/handle more like a car. Granted it is way better than TTB, but a solid front end combined with manual hubs is a stronger, more reliable set up.
I am glad to see it in the larger trucks from the factory. I think solid axles should be on the F150 too, but that is just me.
Technology/marketing sells trucks, leaving us with complicated hardware for us to wonder if it will handle the use and abuse that we subject our trucks to. just my opinion.
#12
Wasn't tryin to argue or make any point regarding the IFS vs solid axle. Not sure why you are... Just noting the IFS is not the reason we can't have hub locks. The designers went the least cost route, which does not allow us hub locks. Many other makers have independant front suspension AND hub locks.
btw
There are uses where solid axles just don't work well. For my uses I prefer a solid axle(hauling). For my brother, he uses his IFS to drag broken solid axle trucks out of the desert at every race. Usuallly not racers or running they are stock class. Does a lot of course marking with his 2000 as well. Couldn't pay him to use solid axle for that.
Have a good Day
btw
There are uses where solid axles just don't work well. For my uses I prefer a solid axle(hauling). For my brother, he uses his IFS to drag broken solid axle trucks out of the desert at every race. Usuallly not racers or running they are stock class. Does a lot of course marking with his 2000 as well. Couldn't pay him to use solid axle for that.
Have a good Day
#13
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cuttn4fun
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
8
02-11-2015 01:39 PM
95F150SuperCab
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
22
08-26-2010 03:50 PM
Fusion
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
2
03-16-2003 01:01 AM