rod length?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-15-2007, 10:07 PM
Jeff's Secretary's Avatar
Jeff's Secretary
Jeff's Secretary is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: metro Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rod length?

Does anyone have hands-on experience stroking a 360 to a 390 using the longer 360 rods instead of the shorter 390 rods? Is there machine work involved in doing this? If so, can you describe?

The search for info continues....:-)
 
  #2  
Old 08-16-2007, 02:32 AM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Special pistons (can you say very big bucks) with really high wrist pins and it will be cheaper getting rebuilt 390 rods.
 
  #3  
Old 08-16-2007, 06:26 AM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
Stronger too. The 360 rods are weak sisters compared to the 390/410/428 rod.
 
  #4  
Old 08-16-2007, 01:36 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 298 Likes on 157 Posts
Stroking a 360 to a 390 involves a 390 crankshaft, 390 rods, and 390 pistons.

Are you confusing "360 rods" with "360 pistons"?

Because using 360 pistons on a 390 crank and rods will get you higher compression, right Bear?
 
  #5  
Old 08-16-2007, 02:12 PM
Bear 45/70's Avatar
Bear 45/70
Bear 45/70 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Union, Washington
Posts: 6,056
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by krewat
Stroking a 360 to a 390 involves a 390 crankshaft, 390 rods, and 390 pistons.

Are you confusing "360 rods" with "360 pistons"?

Because using 360 pistons on a 390 crank and rods will get you higher compression, right Bear?
Yep, kerwat; That's the word on the 360 pistons.
 
  #6  
Old 08-18-2007, 01:45 PM
gbrett's Avatar
gbrett
gbrett is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did it lasted 7000 miles ruined block crank and a cpl rods and broke cam into 3 pieces
 
  #7  
Old 08-18-2007, 09:33 PM
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
"Beemer Nut" is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: "Islander"
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
But ya proved it can be done.
Why go thru the trouble of only adding .278"
more stroke if your looking for more torque,
go for adding .480" with a 428 arm.
Take a look at Scat's 3.98", 4.125" or the 4.250" arms.
 
  #8  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:19 PM
gbrett's Avatar
gbrett
gbrett is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did it when I was a lot younger and didn't know any better
 
  #9  
Old 08-20-2007, 12:16 PM
hotrodfeguy's Avatar
hotrodfeguy
hotrodfeguy is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Green Bay Wi
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Those 360 rods can be used with 390(truck)/410 pistions Instead of 8.1:1 you end up with 9.6:1.
 
  #10  
Old 08-20-2007, 01:48 PM
gbrett's Avatar
gbrett
gbrett is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yes thats right because the compression hieght of the piston is so much less
 
  #11  
Old 08-20-2007, 02:13 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 298 Likes on 157 Posts
With all the other possibilities out there, why use a wimpy 360 rod?
 
  #12  
Old 08-20-2007, 03:01 PM
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
"Beemer Nut" is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: "Islander"
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
If it were me I would use KB 150 pistons with the quench top.
 
  #13  
Old 08-20-2007, 04:50 PM
hotrodfeguy's Avatar
hotrodfeguy
hotrodfeguy is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Green Bay Wi
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just have to match the heavy wrist pins(360) with the light rods(360). Otherwise bal issues come into play. Heavy rod goes with light wrist pins.

Well the reason for the use of the 360 rod is two fold. one they are laying around for nill price wise. Two they offer a higher quench by .060 witch is effective for a wedge engine. Not to mention if you use the light weight pins you could reduce rotating mass, but at a price. Your not going to spin a 360 rod over 6k for too long
 

Last edited by hotrodfeguy; 08-20-2007 at 04:54 PM.
  #14  
Old 08-20-2007, 07:36 PM
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
"Beemer Nut" is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: "Islander"
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I would like to see a 390 with 360 rods spinning over 6K but from a safe distance.
 

Last edited by "Beemer Nut"; 08-20-2007 at 07:40 PM.
  #15  
Old 08-20-2007, 09:10 PM
baddad457's Avatar
baddad457
baddad457 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: May 2003
Location: south louisiana
Posts: 11,122
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 14 Posts
You can get max quench using 390 rods, you just have to do your homework and do it right. I'd rather spend time doing it this way AND have stronger rods than build one with 352/360 rods.
 


Quick Reply: rod length?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.