When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Right on DOHC. One of the drawbacks of the OHC. They're WIDE compared to a pushrod engine. I'll coerce my fellow co-worker to give me a ride in his R this summer.
Umm...., I hate to say it, but you cannot increase the stroke by using different pistons, rods, and wrist pin locations. You can only change stroke by using a different crank setup for a different stroke.
Originally posted by adelyser Umm...., I hate to say it, but you cannot increase the stroke by using different pistons, rods, and wrist pin locations. You can only change stroke by using a different crank setup for a different stroke.
The problem with your explanation is if you put a "different" crank (longer) and try to use the original pistons and rods your pistons will be past the deck the amount you increased your stroke.
What was being said was IF you use a block with the same crank centerline you can put a longer stroke crank in it and use the shorter rods and higher wrist pin locations. The stroker kits in most applications is exactly this set up.
The discussion here was that the 5.4 IS NOT a stroked 4.6. The 5.4 not only has a longer stroke, it also has longer rods. This being the case, the block MUST be taller. (unless you move your wrist pins past the top of your piston[sarcasm].
The original post concerning a different stroke was this: "you can increase the stroke simply by longer rods on pistons with shorter skirts and wrist pin location higher..."
I was responding that it simply cannot be done with just these parts. In fact, none of these parts has to do with the stroke. Only the crank determines the stroke.
Now, if you do install a crank with a different (longer or shorter) stroke, I agree that you will need at least new con-rods to compensate for the new stroke and maintain the same deck height.
I guess I should have been a little clearer in my post.
Originally posted by adelyser The original post concerning a different stroke was this: "you can increase the stroke simply by longer rods on pistons with shorter skirts and wrist pin location higher..."
I was responding that it simply cannot be done with just these parts. In fact, none of these parts has to do with the stroke. Only the crank determines the stroke.
Now, if you do install a crank with a different (longer or shorter) stroke, I agree that you will need at least new con-rods to compensate for the new stroke and maintain the same deck height.
I guess I should have been a little clearer in my post.
That's cool. I assumed the original post was using a stroker crank and was just commenting on the additional parts needed.
Its the same thing that went on with the old FE. You had a 360, 390, and 410 that all shared the same block. The 360 had a 3.5" stroke, the 390 a 3.78", and the 410 a 3.98". There were two rod sizes, the long rod and the short rod. They used the long rod with the 360, and the short rod with the 390 and 410. The 390 and 360 also shared pistons. They had to use a different piston on the 410, tho. I imagine the same kind of thing is going on with the 4.6 and the 5.4 mod motors.
I checked the holley link you gave on the first page, and apparently they dont. This makes me wonder why not. Seems to me it would be a lot easier to make one standard block.
Originally posted by rusty70f100 I checked the holley link you gave on the first page, and apparently they dont. This makes me wonder why not. Seems to me it would be a lot easier to make one standard block.
Same reason there's a 351W block and a 302 block. The 351W has a higher deck for more stroke - same with the 4.6L vs 5.4L
Don't think it could be done. Would totally screw up the geometry. It would also need a really short rod. Rod ratio on a 5.4 is nothing to brag about in the first place. 3.55 stroke vs. 4.16. If they made it a pushrod, who knows what could be done. It would more than likely be narrower.
They theoretically could have the same block, if they used the 5.4 block. The 4.6 would have to use longer rods. I wonder why they didnt do it this way, as it would make more power by not side loading the pison as much. The only drawback I can see is that it would weigh more than the 4.6 does now.
P.S. I appologize for not checking the link on the first page before I made my first post in this thread.
Originally posted by rusty70f100 They theoretically could have the same block, if they used the 5.4 block. The 4.6 would have to use longer rods. I wonder why they didnt do it this way, as it would make more power by not side loading the pison as much. The only drawback I can see is that it would weigh more than the 4.6 does now.
As I've heard it, Ford originally designed the 4.6L to fit in front-wheel drive cars like the Lincoln Continental. That's why the main bearings are so narrow to reduce the overall length of the motor. Overall height was also a concern.
As it turns out, they decided to start using the 4.6L to replace the 5.0 and found that it just didn't have enough durability and low-end torque for trucks and other heavy-duty use. So, the Windsor 4.6L came out and the 5.4L was designed. I don't think the 5.4L was a goal of the original design.
By the way, if the 4.6L had a higher deck and longer rods, I think low-end torque would suffer. The acceleration of the piston just after firing is much faster than if a longer rod was used. Also, the angle of the rod just before and after TDC provides more leverage.