Notices
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Innova

4 speakers one amp.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2007 | 12:21 AM
  #16  
N.D. Nation's Avatar
N.D. Nation
Freshman User
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Most HU's have 15-27 watts (RMS) of power per channel. Not too bad if you have very efficient speakers. A Factory HU will give most cars ~90-95dB of SPL to mids and highs.

A good 4 channel for the interiors and a decent Mono amp for the sub is a preferred choice.

If you have a larger sub system installed, additional amping power is always a good option to balance out the mix. Depending on how loud you want the entire system to play (and how much power your intereior speakers can handle) I use roughly an 8:1 ratio ... meaning 800 watts subs, 100 watts to interior speakers per channel.

The other aspect of good balanced SQ (sound quality) system, is to match interior out SPL to subs. Say you target 110dB full range (that's pretty loud) would need 128 watts/channel interiors . (assuming 89dB ref @ 1 watt/1 meter) Cut that by 50%, (64 watts) you'll get 107dB... still very loud.

Also, you may want to seriously consider upgrading the ALT/BAT and BAT/GND wires to #4 gage. Stock wires are usually #6-8 gage. This will help transfer maximum current from ALT to BAT and amps.
 
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #17  
deisele75's Avatar
deisele75
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 892
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=4 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by X-OvrDistortion
No. Run the front set off an amp and the rear off the HU. Amping the rear will kill your soundstage.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
How will it kill the soundstage?
I'm fairly new to audio. Can someone explain this concept to me?
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 05:21 AM
  #18  
RomerB2's Avatar
RomerB2
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 1
From: Bixby, OK
04F-250 stroked - Congrats on the new components, I prefer amping all the speakers through dedicated amps. Since you're going old school (with some freakin sweet amps I might add.. what's the stats on the 225?), I wouldn't worry about trying to use the HU's built-in amp, it's not worth it.. you might also think about buying another 2-channel amp and using the 2150 for a sub since it can put out 600wRMS of true power when bridged.. I love old school amps, aren't they great?


Originally Posted by matt1982
I would recommend using an amp for all 4 speakers, especially is you are using components. The primary killer of speakers is underpowering. A typical head unit puts out anywhere from 15-22 watts of power RMS (realistic power) whereas a speaker may require anywhere from 50-100 watts RMS. So if you amp the fronts and run the rears of deck power you will be shortening the life span of the back speakers. The reason is you will be able to turn up the radio louder and get better clarity out of the fronts, but you won't neccesarily here all the distortion from the rear. Underpowering a speaker is like running a motor with no oil. The speaker has to work harder to create the noise you want, all the while heating up and then the voicecoil burns up. And that's where the burnt electronics smell comes from when you blow a speaker.
So that's my 2 cents.
Wow.. I've never heard someone actually try to argue that too little power to the speakers will kill them. I guess I should keep my home theater speakers turned up enough to give my speakers a good work out.. my neighbors are going to be so pissed at me! You won't hurt your speakers by running them with the volume turned down, if anything you're prolonging their life. Your analogy would be good if it were true that speakers had oil between the voice coil and magnet that drained out when you turned the volume down, but it's not true. The voice-coils only heat up when they're in use (caused by friction).. it's impossible to burn up your voice coils by under powering them. If you really want to argue this, then maybe you should learn how a speaker works first. Sorry to bust your chaps.

Originally Posted by matt1982
That's what gains are for. You can always just set the rear gain lower than the front and it gives you more far more adjustability over using the head unit. Running the rears of the deck while require you to use the fader, whereas using an amp with a front and rear gain will let you tune your system exactly to your liking. In my opinion using an amp allows for greater flexibility in fine tuning an audio system. But hey... 2 channel amps tend to be cheaper.
How does lowering the gain in the amp give you more adjustability than using the head unit? Doesn't it actually.. give you less? If you want to make a change in the fading because a certain CD would sound better with a more "aural" effect, you'd just have to go into the menu on the HU and change it up.. no digging around in the back to turn up the rear speakers for one CD. That's just an example, but still, that's not the reason the gain is on the amp in the first place..

To deisele75 - Some people believe that you should have your soundstage set where it sounds like it's coming from the front of the vehicle.. kind of like being at a concert. Personally I believe this is BS, since I like my sound to envelope me instead of sounding distant. If you're really worried about a "soundstage" then you better get to modifying that car of yours.. the steering wheel needs to be in the middle of the dash and you need to move your seat too.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2007 | 07:04 PM
  #19  
04F-250 stroked's Avatar
04F-250 stroked
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
From: SFV, CALIFORNIA
Originally Posted by RomerB2
04F-250 stroked - Congrats on the new components, I prefer amping all the speakers through dedicated amps. Since you're going old school (with some freakin sweet amps I might add.. what's the stats on the 225?), I wouldn't worry about trying to use the HU's built-in amp, it's not worth it.. you might also think about buying another 2-channel amp and using the 2150 for a sub since it can put out 600wRMS of true power when bridged.. I love old school amps, aren't they great?
ThankS
i decided to buy a jl audio e4300 to run components. hopefully it'll sound good. On a side note: I just purchased some idq 10" from supercrewsounds.com and will be running them with the ppi pc2150.
P.S. thanks beerstalker for the help! rep points to ya!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2007 | 05:23 AM
  #20  
RomerB2's Avatar
RomerB2
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,624
Likes: 1
From: Bixby, OK
Sounds like a sweet deal!
 
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #21  
Brian460's Avatar
Brian460
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
From: Paola, KS
I think what he is trying to say about underpowering is that, when you try to play a speaker at a higher SPL and you underpower it in the process it destroys the speaker because the amp is trying to create something it can't which causes distortion. When you try to get more out of a amp than it will make then it clips, which causes a flatline in the wave when viewed on an o-scope this flatline is seen to the speaker theorectically as DC even though it is not, which in turn creates extreme heat.

There is no friction in the voice-coil it touches nothing but air.

So it really is better to slightly oversize an amp. If you speakers can handle say 75 W RMS then get an amp that can do 100 W RMS and cut it back a little. That way you are not using a 75 W RMS amp at maximum capacity with the 100 W RMS amp you still have headroom left.
 

Last edited by Brian460; Nov 16, 2007 at 11:15 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lariat97
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
22
Apr 21, 2010 02:31 PM
captain p4
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
15
May 5, 2006 02:25 PM
Black04FX4
2004 - 2008 F150
3
Jun 30, 2004 06:33 PM
First Ford Truck
Audio & Video Systems, Navigation, Satellite Radio & Mobile Electronics
12
Oct 11, 2003 11:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE