2.5L 4-cyl Engine/Chamber Dimensions - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2.5L 4-cyl Engine/Chamber Dimensions

Reply
 
 
submit to reddit
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-19-2007, 06:50 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
2.5L 4-cyl Engine/Chamber Dimensions

I've got a '98 Ranger with a 2.5L 4-cylinder engine that needs a bit more power. I'm trying to do it as inexpensively as possible, so I need to know a few specifics before I decide exactly what I'm going to do.

Is this an interference engine?
What is the piston-valve clearance?
What is the combustion chamber volume?
Are stock pistons dished, domed, or flat topped?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-21-2007, 02:11 AM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
BTT

After running roughly a half-tank through my pickup, I'm getting ~30mpg in town. Not bad, I suppose, but I'd like to push that into the 40 range or so. Shouldn't be too tough...

Using various mods, such as PowreLynz, PowreRingz, Singh Grooves, Edging, high(er) compression, and ECU tuning, 40 mpg should be a daily figure.

www.fueleconomytips.com
www.mpgresearch.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-21-2007, 08:02 AM
tomw tomw is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 4,706
tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.
Well it is not an interference engine, and I think they all have flat top pistons.

check this one out as a 2.5 is a stroked 2.3:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...6&goto=newpost
tom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-21-2007, 07:42 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
That gives me a lot of information, but nothing specific.

Does anyone know how much can be shaved off a stock 2.3/2.5 cylinder head before hitting water? I want to get to ~10.5:1 compression...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-21-2007, 08:58 PM
jimdandy jimdandy is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,448
jimdandy has a good reputation on FTE.jimdandy has a good reputation on FTE.jimdandy has a good reputation on FTE.
10.5:1 is not problem. The 2.3 heads can be shaved as much as .200, maybe more. Racers cut them well into the manifold bolt holes. If you cut too much, it will throw the cam timing off, so you would have to use an adjustable timing gear. Pistons are flat on the 2.3, don't know about the 2.5 jd
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2007, 10:39 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Cool! Where would I go to get a low cost adjustable timing gear? The cam is belt driven so I'm guessing the timing "pulley" is what I'd be changing? I've worked on OHV engines but this is my first OHC...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2007, 06:53 AM
tomw tomw is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 4,706
tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.
Racer Walsh used to have adjustable cam gears.. I think
tom
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-22-2007, 01:08 PM
Old Rob Old Rob is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Old Rob is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 2.3/2.5 liter lima engine IS an interference, not by much, however enough. The pistons are cast flat top for NA and forged dished for Turbo's. I've never seen a stock 2.5 turbo engine thou. To get to a specific CR you need to know exactly what you have. The factory number is bogus and if you measure it, you'll find it to be higher than produced. On the KB piston site there is a compression formula that you can use.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-22-2007, 02:59 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
So to know what I have I would need to tear the engine down and make some measurements. If the engine is already slightly interference (without valve-piston contact) what would be needed to raise the compression? If I were to shave 0.18" off the head, would I also have to cut valve reliefs in the pistons?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:57 PM
Old Rob Old Rob is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Old Rob is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinhead-227
So to know what I have I would need to tear the engine down and make some measurements. If the engine is already slightly interference (without valve-piston contact) what would be needed to raise the compression? If I were to shave 0.18" off the head, would I also have to cut valve reliefs in the pistons?
At least check them and see what you've got to be safe. You'll want .090 on the exhaust and .060 on the intakes. If you're running an adjustable gear then check it retarded and advanced.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-23-2007, 07:11 AM
tomw tomw is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 4,706
tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.
Well, someone should tell the rest of the world that the 2.3 is interference, as all I have read says not. I have not checked with a running engine. Heh. Nor have I checked with one taken apart, so I have no personal knowledge.
The Gates Rubber Co web site has a PDF file of engine timing belts with indication to their interference status, and that was one of my sources of 'knowledge', and the one I would go back to most.
tom
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-23-2007, 12:04 PM
Old Rob Old Rob is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Old Rob is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomw
Well, someone should tell the rest of the world that the 2.3 is interference, as all I have read says not. I have not checked with a running engine. Heh. Nor have I checked with one taken apart, so I have no personal knowledge.
The Gates Rubber Co web site has a PDF file of engine timing belts with indication to their interference status, and that was one of my sources of 'knowledge', and the one I would go back to most.
tom
I have thru the years run into some (not many) that after throwing the belt, had to remove the head and change a slightly bent valve. I t has happened. In this thread discussion is to mill the head for more compression, which will bring things closer together. It's best to have an accurate measurement to be sure of possible problems.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-23-2007, 01:50 PM
tomw tomw is offline
Postmaster
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: suburban atlanta
Posts: 4,706
tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.tomw has a very good reputation on FTE.
I've heard of using modeling clay on the piston top and going thru a couple rotations to check for clearance. If you mill the head or the deck, for sure you should check clearance. I would do that on all the cylinders if I were putting some money into the engine, or changing the cam.
I would bet that some cam/rocker-follower/lifter/valve combos could lead to interference.
tom
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-23-2007, 05:24 PM
Old Rob Old Rob is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Old Rob is starting off with a positive reputation.
Clay seems to be the best way after over 40 years, that I've been doing it. With zero or positve piston to deck placement and milled heads, you'll need eyebrows in the pistons of varying depth for any cam if the belt should take a holiday.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-23-2007, 02:26 PM
99F150 99F150 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,279
99F150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
[QUOTE=Pinhead-227]That gives me a lot of information, but nothing specific.

Does anyone know how much can be shaved off a stock 2.3/2.5 cylinder head before hitting water? I want to get to ~10.5:1 compression...[/QUOTE

What have you found out yet? I am looking to shave the head on my 99 Ranger to raise the compression to 11:1. I am running E85 and want to make the engine more efficient on that fuel.

Dan
Reply With Quote
 
 
submit to reddit
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
?DB2 Automatic Advance ADJUSTMENT? and I/P Timing HELP Needed in Germany Fixnstuff Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 51 06-17-2016 09:26 PM
Compression Ratio Blues Resto Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W) 4 05-24-2016 09:02 PM
My 408 slow build hivoltj 335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland 67 04-25-2016 10:47 PM
How to calculate IDI compression ratio? This is driving me CRazy!!! Ford F834 Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L) 21 12-14-2015 09:50 PM
351m to 400 conversion help mjr46 335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland 35 10-14-2015 04:01 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > >

Tags
25l, 4cyl, 62, build, clearance, cyl, demitions, engine, engines, ford, gas, measurements, piston, usual, valve

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.