Motor set between the rails, 400M!
#16
#18
Check out my gallery "steering details"
I mounted a Caddy 500ci in my 49. Dimensionally the engine isn't huge but it does take up some room. After I got the engine mounted I chose to use the Toyoto steering box. I decided that my exhaust was a bit too close to the steering box so I mounted the steering box ahead of the axle. No biggie
Bobby
I mounted a Caddy 500ci in my 49. Dimensionally the engine isn't huge but it does take up some room. After I got the engine mounted I chose to use the Toyoto steering box. I decided that my exhaust was a bit too close to the steering box so I mounted the steering box ahead of the axle. No biggie
Bobby
#21
I got the motor back out. It looks like if I slide the motor front just 1 1/2 inches I will have enough room for the manifold. I think that it should be slid forward anyway, as I was really tight to the firewall. Someone posted a few pics for me to check out, and I should have more than enough room to get a radiator in.
Since my truck is channeled 6 inches I am going to have to butcher the inner fenders anyway. I can't imagine having room for headers in there yet. I don't have a pair in hand to try though either. As far as shifting the motor toward the PS, that manifold is only about 1/2 from the frame rail. Moving the motor forward a bit will help with the clearnace between the oil pan and front axle. Right now it looks like it would have to "clearance itself" at the first big bump I hit.
CHAZ
Since my truck is channeled 6 inches I am going to have to butcher the inner fenders anyway. I can't imagine having room for headers in there yet. I don't have a pair in hand to try though either. As far as shifting the motor toward the PS, that manifold is only about 1/2 from the frame rail. Moving the motor forward a bit will help with the clearnace between the oil pan and front axle. Right now it looks like it would have to "clearance itself" at the first big bump I hit.
CHAZ
#22
#23
#24
#25
#26
Branden, all I know is that its a bit narrower than the 53-56. Havi says 2". I can measure it if someone needs it.
Years ago when I made a 4x4 from a 1960 F-100 by combining it with components from a 75 F-150 I ended up routing the exhaust over the frame rail from the factory exhaust manifolds so that I could have room for the front driveshaft. I didn't have to hack up the inner fenders too bad on that truck.
On the 48-52 trucks the inner fenders are fairly simple, they bolt along the top of the fender, they have one bolt at the cab. They do get a bit more complicated at the radiator support as they bolt to the support and the fenders bolt to them but still its not a huge thing if you wanted to do away with them or modify them. They don't touch the frame at all (well, the 48-50 trucks did have one bolt back at the cab that did but its a bit useless in the long run)
Bobby
Years ago when I made a 4x4 from a 1960 F-100 by combining it with components from a 75 F-150 I ended up routing the exhaust over the frame rail from the factory exhaust manifolds so that I could have room for the front driveshaft. I didn't have to hack up the inner fenders too bad on that truck.
On the 48-52 trucks the inner fenders are fairly simple, they bolt along the top of the fender, they have one bolt at the cab. They do get a bit more complicated at the radiator support as they bolt to the support and the fenders bolt to them but still its not a huge thing if you wanted to do away with them or modify them. They don't touch the frame at all (well, the 48-50 trucks did have one bolt back at the cab that did but its a bit useless in the long run)
Bobby
#27
Well, if it is only 2" narrower than a '53-'56, I don't see why it wouldn't fit. I started off making my own headers, and it was a headache. I ended up buying a set of Sanderson headers. They offer 3 different styles for the 351C (these will fit the 400, you just need the "adapter plate"). The ones I have are basically a block hugger style. They are expensive, however. I don't see any reason to go with fender well headers unless you want those. I think trying to fit those would cause bigger problems, but what do I know?
#28
Originally Posted by bobbytnm
Branden, all I know is that its a bit narrower than the 53-56. Havi says 2". I can measure it if someone needs it.
#30
Come on Guys, a Guy here in town squeezed a 400 in a Fox Body Mustang, with a Turbo.
Edit: After looking at Hoof's first post and pic, It look like headers could be made to fit, and with a Toy ps box, a couple custom bends may be all that's needed. Inner fenders could be "stepped" if needed.
With that No-Limit tranny crossmember w/2" offset, was that for a TH350 tranny? Was it specific to a 2" offset, or is there just 2" more clearance?
Last edited by havi; 05-17-2007 at 08:39 PM.