We Want You! Folding Info & FAQs

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#46

06-06-2007, 10:21 PM

RexB

Posting Guru

Thread Starter

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 1,692

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally Posted by Placermike

Not sure about all that...Just let the 'bug' run. Here is the info I got from the log.

[18:43:48] Project: 2125 (Run 103, Clone 65, Gen 8)
[18:43:48] Assembly optimizations on if available.
[18:43:48] Entering M.D.
[18:44:08] (Starting from checkpoint)
[18:44:08] Protein: p2125_lambda_5way_melt_4_10011
[18:44:08] Writing local files
[18:44:08] Using table 1
[18:44:08] Completed 109189 out of 20000000 steps (1)

Don't kow if this is what you were asking about.
Mike

That's part of it, though not enough log to see how long the frame times are...P(project)2125 is a medium-slow processing Gromacs FAH core with a mid-range number of atoms, 10,011. It takes this 2.4GHz cpu at 98% usage 75 hours to process. P212x are one of the few projects that Intels take longer to process than AMD's, just luck of the draw. P2124 is the same, 75 hours to process here. Some WU's process faster on Intel chips. I don't need to see more of the log, now i know what the slow processing reason is.

Reply Like

#47

08-05-2007, 02:44 PM

Placermike

Postmaster

Join Date: Jan 2007

Location: Sequim, WA

Posts: 4,287

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

New Work Packets

Has anyone else had trouble getting works packets?...When I check the status, it says that it is attempting to get a new work packet, and that has been going on for a few days now.

Reply Like