Ohio Chapter Join Chapter, Leader: RUNVS

Pending Legislation:

  #1  
Old 03-26-2006, 09:40 PM
F2504x4's Avatar
F2504x4
F2504x4 is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the road in Ohio
Posts: 6,766
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Post Pending Legislation:

New York Introduces Bill to Ban the Use of Grille/Brush Guards
A bill (A.B. 10116) has been introduced in the New York Legislature to prohibit the public road use of motor vehicles equipped with a grille or brush guard. The bill has been referred to the Assembly Transportation Committee for consideration and a vote.

We Urge You to Contact Members of the New York Assembly Transportation Committee (List Below) Immediately to Request Their Opposition to A.B. 10116.

A.B. 10116 relies on unsubstantiated claims that these grille guards create the potential of greater harm to other vehicles in the event of a collision.


A.B. 10116 relies on unsubstantiated claims that grille guards obstruct airbag sensors, rendering the airbags useless in an accident.


A.B. 10116 would require owners of vehicles currently equipped with grille guards (including those purchased with this equipment from a dealership) to remove these guards.
DON’T DELAY! Please contact members of the New York Assembly Transportation Committee immediately by phone or e-mail to request their opposition to this bill.

Please e-mail a copy of your letter to stevem AT sema.org. Thank you for your assistance.


New York Assembly Transportation Committee

David F. Gantt, Chair
518-455-5606

New York Introduces Bill to Ban the Use of Grille/Brush Guards
A bill (A.B. 10116) has been introduced in the New York Legislature to prohibit the public road use of motor vehicles equipped with a grille or brush guard. The bill has been referred to the Assembly Transportation Committee for consideration and a vote.

We Urge You to Contact Members of the New York Assembly Transportation Committee (List Below) Immediately to Request Their Opposition to A.B. 10116.

A.B. 10116 relies on unsubstantiated claims that these grille guards create the potential of greater harm to other vehicles in the event of a collision.


A.B. 10116 relies on unsubstantiated claims that grille guards obstruct airbag sensors, rendering the airbags useless in an accident.


A.B. 10116 would require owners of vehicles currently equipped with grille guards (including those purchased with this equipment from a dealership) to remove these guards.
DON’T DELAY! Please contact members of the New York Assembly Transportation Committee immediately by phone or e-mail to request their opposition to this bill.

Please e-mail a copy of your letter to stevem@sema.org. Thank you for your assistance.


New York Assembly Transportation Committee

David F. Gantt, Chair
518-455-5606

Marc Alessi
alessim at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5294

Darrel J. Aubertine
aubertd at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5545

Jim Bacalles
bacallj at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5791

Pat Casale
casalep at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5777

Michael Cusick
518-455-5526

Ruben Diaz, Jr.
diazr at assembly.state.ny.us

Francine DelMonte
delmonf at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5284

Sam Hoyt
hoyts at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4886

Ivan C. Lafayette
lafayei AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4545

George S. Latimer
latimeg at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4897

John W. Lavelle
lavellj at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4677

Charles D. Lavine
lavinec at assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5456

Donna Lupardo
lupardd AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5431

Pat Manning
manninp At assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5177

David G. McDonough
McDonoD AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4633

Brian M. McLaughlin
mclaugb AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5172

Jimmy Meng
mengj AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5411

Joan L. Millman
millmaj AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5426

Matthew Mirones
mironem AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5716

Chris Ortloff
ortlofc AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5943

N. Nick Perry
perryn AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-4166

Paul D. Tonko
tonkop AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-5197

Harvey Weisenberg
weisenh AT assembly.state.ny.us
518-455-3028







http://www.semasan.com/main/main.aspx?ID=61877

Issue: Vehicle Emissions
Bill: SB 120
Status: Active
Location:
Description: Amends and repeals sections of code regarding vehicle emissions inspections. Exempts vehicles 25 years and older, historics vehicles, and other vehicles from remote-sensing emissions.
Author: Senators Grendell, Coughlin, Fingerhut
Intro Date: 7-Apr-05
Bill Type: Two Year Bill from 2005

Issue: Misc.
Bill: HB 274
Status: Active
Location:
Description: Prohibits any person from operating a moving vehicle while using a mobile telephone without a hands-free device. Also creates the offense of inattentive driving with definitions.
Author: Representative Barrett
Intro Date: 24-May-05
Bill Type: Two Year Bill from 2005
 

Last edited by F2504x4; 03-26-2006 at 09:48 PM.
  #2  
Old 03-28-2006, 09:44 PM
DeckedoutF150's Avatar
DeckedoutF150
DeckedoutF150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamilton, ohio
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
that is crazzy, just goes to show you that the US is selling out. what free country?? and its only going to get worse. sometimes i wonder if i am doing something wrong when i am walking down the street.
 
  #3  
Old 04-08-2006, 05:14 PM
78bigbronco's Avatar
78bigbronco
78bigbronco is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Next thing and we wont be able to have aftermarket bumpers of any kind, especially not those 1/4" plate winch bumpers... and putting non-factory fog lights will surely mess up the air bag sensor too. And soon to come will be the ban of any vehicle that doesnt meet current standards. I fear the day.

Maybe I should suggest they ban semi-trucks on the road since they pose such a significate threat in a collision with a passanger vehicle!?!
 
  #4  
Old 04-10-2006, 07:43 PM
DeckedoutF150's Avatar
DeckedoutF150
DeckedoutF150 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hamilton, ohio
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
might as well go for it. you never know they might pass it. i just do not like the turn our country is taking. its not a very good one. i feel like this country is not free any more. they laws like this and people who think of laws like that, just blow it out of proportion. i just dont understnad it. all i see is things getting worse and not better.
 
  #5  
Old 06-28-2006, 09:20 AM
KingSix's Avatar
KingSix
KingSix is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ktown
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If anything, those guards would probably protect your vehicle, well at least the front anyway, from someone hitting you or you hitting them.
 
  #6  
Old 02-09-2007, 09:59 AM
lawbreaker2's Avatar
lawbreaker2
lawbreaker2 is offline
New User
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well then I think all these turds that make these law would quit running the red lights, I wouldn't have to have a push bar to PROTECT ME. But I agree that I don't like all these law anymore, Something is not right, I to feel that I'm always doing something wrong going down the street. I think these law makers have to push something though in order to get a pay check.
 
  #7  
Old 02-10-2007, 08:28 AM
1stdtruck's Avatar
1stdtruck
1stdtruck is offline
Freshman User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what kind of idiots come up with those ideas, and why, I dont see how a brush guard can impeed a sensor from going off. just another way for the man to limit us, crazy nutheads.

matt z
 


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.