2007 Chevy 3/4 tons take a look
#1
2007 Chevy 3/4 tons take a look
http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=10791
yep there the 2007's take a look I think they are really ugly whats your opinion? I say that they are screaming Ford hahaha
yep there the 2007's take a look I think they are really ugly whats your opinion? I say that they are screaming Ford hahaha
#2
also see http://www.cheersandgears.com/forums...howtopic=10724
LoL look at the payload on um doesint even touch the ford 3060 in the F-150 these trucks dont look as strong as the F-150s and thats for damn sure
LoL look at the payload on um doesint even touch the ford 3060 in the F-150 these trucks dont look as strong as the F-150s and thats for damn sure
#4
Engine offerings include:• 4.3L V-6 (LU3), rated at 195 hp (145 kW) and 260 lb.-ft. of torque (353 Nm).
• 4.8L V-8 (LY2), with iron block; rated at 295 hp (220 kW) and 305 lb.-ft. of torque (414 Nm)*.
• 5.3L FlexFuel V-8 (LMG), E85-capable with iron block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L FlexFuel V-8 (LC9), E85-capable with aluminum block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L V-8 (LH6), with aluminum block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L V-8 (LY5), with iron block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 6.0L V-8 (L76), with aluminum block, variable valve timing and Active Fuel Management, rated at 367 hp (274 kW) and 375 lb.-ft. of torque (508 Nm)*.
• 6.2L V-8 (L92), with aluminum block and variable valve timing, rated at 400 hp (298 kW) and 417 lb.-ft. of torque (565 Nm)** – exclusive on GMC Sierra Denali.
WOW, thats some big power they're offering.. time for some v10 upgrades
• 4.8L V-8 (LY2), with iron block; rated at 295 hp (220 kW) and 305 lb.-ft. of torque (414 Nm)*.
• 5.3L FlexFuel V-8 (LMG), E85-capable with iron block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L FlexFuel V-8 (LC9), E85-capable with aluminum block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L V-8 (LH6), with aluminum block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 5.3L V-8 (LY5), with iron block and Active Fuel Management, rated at 315 hp (235 kW) and 338 lb.-ft. of torque (458 Nm)*.
• 6.0L V-8 (L76), with aluminum block, variable valve timing and Active Fuel Management, rated at 367 hp (274 kW) and 375 lb.-ft. of torque (508 Nm)*.
• 6.2L V-8 (L92), with aluminum block and variable valve timing, rated at 400 hp (298 kW) and 417 lb.-ft. of torque (565 Nm)** – exclusive on GMC Sierra Denali.
WOW, thats some big power they're offering.. time for some v10 upgrades
#6
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
these trucks dont look as strong as the F-150s and thats for damn sure
All you can see is sheet metal and seat fabric.
Go to www.chevrolet.com
They have some animation showing the chassis on these trucks. Then form a conclusion. If you still like the Ford better, at least you will (seem to) know what you are talking about.
Like another poster said, you could slap a blue oval on a turd and some people would buy it.
Last edited by jschira; 08-04-2006 at 11:33 AM.
#7
Trending Topics
#8
well they now have everthing the F-150s got stronger frame, powered sliding rear window, powerd rear window that go down so yes good for chevy in trying to compete with its worst enemy to bad the 2007 Fords are getting ups aswell like both matchin 10,500 pound trailers to bad the fords got 890 pounds more payload good for chev they gotta do what they are doing copy everything from the 04-06 Fords
#9
Originally Posted by 93RangerXL4x2
good for chev they gotta do what they are doing copy everything from the 04-06 Fords
I wonder who GM copied the steering wheel from? Good thing, or the new models would still have reins. "Gidde'yup Bowtie!".
Everyone does marketing research to try and figure out what customers want. This is a little like black magic, because you are trying to predict fads 3-5 years down the road. Sometimes, you get ahead of the curve, sometimes you are behind.
You also save some features for newer models to try and differentiate the new from the old and give existing owners a reason to trade in for the new model.
One thing that GM "copied" that I do not appreciate is the higher sides of the F-150 box. Most annoying way to "increase payload capacity" that I have ever seen. Can't reach in and get a darn thing out of that box without climbing in.
Last edited by jschira; 08-04-2006 at 01:03 PM.
#11
#12
#13
Very handsome trucks......and I think the GMC has a LOT of Super Duty styling cues in the grill area. The Chevy really turned it around compared to the samarai abortion previously offered.
If the '08 Super Duty looks anything like the spy shots I've seen.......Ford may be in bigger trouble than they are now.
The MAJORITY of LIGHT truck owners could care less about a few hundred pound payload difference or MAXIMUM towing capacities.
Jschira, that's just disgusting!............funny as hell, but disgusting!!
(let me know how much he pays you for it!!)
If the '08 Super Duty looks anything like the spy shots I've seen.......Ford may be in bigger trouble than they are now.
The MAJORITY of LIGHT truck owners could care less about a few hundred pound payload difference or MAXIMUM towing capacities.
Jschira, that's just disgusting!............funny as hell, but disgusting!!
(let me know how much he pays you for it!!)
#14
Originally Posted by DOHCmarauder
The MAJORITY of LIGHT truck owners could care less about a few hundred pound payload difference or MAXIMUM towing capacities.
And I bought a little trailer for $300 at Tractor Supply that will carry 1800 lbs. Only 1' off the ground too. I use it to haul heavy sacks of mulch, etc. home from Home Depot and Lowes. Much easier to load/unload.
#15
93Rangerxl4x2 you need to lay off the Kool-aid, I guess Ford copied Chevy back in 98 when the Silverado was the first pick-up with a hydro formed frame, or Cadillac for having the first electric starter. I personally think they look good but still will give my final word when they actually come out.