1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Interesting way to mount a COE engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 07-18-2006, 11:31 AM
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
bobj49f2 is offline
Hotshot
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Posts: 16,007
Received 2,059 Likes on 804 Posts
Interesting way to mount a COE engine

While doing my normal uPay surfing I came upon this one;

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-...07909460QQrdZ1



I thought this was an interesting way to mount an engine in a COE



It sure would free up room in the cab. I suppose once you plumbed the cooling system to the front and built a cover for the engine it could make a nice set up. I also assume there might be reasons why this wouldn't be a good idea. Let's hear them.
 
  #2  
Old 07-18-2006, 12:51 PM
truckdog62563's Avatar
truckdog62563
truckdog62563 is offline
Marmon-Herrington Man
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 11,700
Received 262 Likes on 216 Posts
A perfect start for you truck racing wanna be's to build that Pikes Peak Hill Climb truck, or Dakar Rally truck. No better way to achieve that essential 50/50 weight distribution . Stu
 
  #3  
Old 07-18-2006, 02:26 PM
4tl8ford's Avatar
4tl8ford
4tl8ford is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Erie, pa
Posts: 7,493
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I also assume there might be reasons why this wouldn't be a good idea. Let's hear them.

Looks Like a GM motor
 
  #4  
Old 07-18-2006, 02:57 PM
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
bobbytnm is offline
Roast em' if you got 'em
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 19,557
Received 3,838 Likes on 1,837 Posts
Looks like a big block Chevy. It would sure open up space inside the cab wouldn't it. I don't see any problems with how its mounted. I've seen several COE's with the engines mounted behind the ccab like that with a bed built over them.

I think that the Chevy engine need to replaced with a big old Caddy engine, but then again, I'm a little biased.

So Bob, did you buy it yet?? come on, whats one more truck in the yard gonna hurt? It looks pretty clean

Bobby
 
  #5  
Old 07-18-2006, 03:11 PM
51dueller's Avatar
51dueller
51dueller is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Saskatoon SK Canada
Posts: 6,682
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
It says it's sitting on a '86 motorhome frame. So maybe the motorhome had the engine sitting back farther?
 
  #6  
Old 07-18-2006, 04:35 PM
Brucekoyle's Avatar
Brucekoyle
Brucekoyle is offline
New User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love that rubber hose for a transmission cooler. The trans wouldn't last too long!!! Of course the cooling system is not plumbed either.

Bruce
 
  #7  
Old 07-18-2006, 04:49 PM
kcb37's Avatar
kcb37
kcb37 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It looks to me like the mounts were welded to the frame, of course I can't see the picture quite that well either.
I don't really see what it would hurt as long as it gets an adequit cooling system. (engine/tranny)
It would shorten the drive shaft making it stronger, as long as it isn't to much angle off the diff or back of the tranny.
I would also agree with Truckdog that it would help get some weight on the back end.
Or atleast further back on the front.
 
  #8  
Old 07-18-2006, 04:53 PM
fatfenders56's Avatar
fatfenders56
fatfenders56 is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I too have seen several of these mounted this way, I think there was one at the 2005 West Coast Nationals, check the pictures from that one. I even remember an ''A stake bed that had the engine under the bed and the original engine bay was a luggage compartment, pretty slick.
 
  #9  
Old 07-18-2006, 06:33 PM
bobj49f2's Avatar
bobj49f2
bobj49f2 is offline
Hotshot
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: SE Wisc. (the Rust Belt)
Posts: 16,007
Received 2,059 Likes on 804 Posts
bobbytnm,

I think buying another project so soon after buying a "new" panel would be pushing it a little too far. I don't think my wife would be so nice to me and then
 
  #10  
Old 07-19-2006, 09:53 AM
hotrod48's Avatar
hotrod48
hotrod48 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: OK
Posts: 895
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I saw that too while doing my EBay searching as well. It caught my eye because I want a 48-50 F-1 COE and it's just over a 100 miles away. I have seen some engines mounted like that before, but for some reason I would rather it be up front. It would make a great truck to build though. The BBC would be nice, but I would rather have a diesel in it.

hotrod48
 
  #11  
Old 07-19-2006, 06:36 PM
tomoto's Avatar
tomoto
tomoto is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: IN.
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was thinking about doing the rear engine, but I'm putting a short bed on. the truck would be to long. so the best way for my is a front wheel drive and put it in the bed.
 
  #12  
Old 07-20-2006, 02:36 AM
sierraben's Avatar
sierraben
sierraben is offline
Post Fiend

Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, Ca.
Posts: 24,418
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
When I bought my '55 F100, I thought about putting the engine behind the cab, and making the engine compartment a front trunk.

Of course I had quite a few beers in me.
 
  #13  
Old 07-20-2006, 05:38 AM
WillyB's Avatar
WillyB
WillyB is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Near Fresno, California
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a cab forward design, not a cab over design. There is no reason to have the cab mounted so high, or for the space wasted in the engine compartment in that truck.

There is a neat cab forward setup that the major manufacturers have used that would look and work better if you wanted to mount the engine in that location.

We had one truck with the GM 454 in it - fill a 20 foot grain bed and you are down to 3 or 4 MPG, which is what some of the motor homes with the 454 get.
 
  #14  
Old 07-20-2006, 01:58 PM
create's Avatar
create
create is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*****: im going to guess that the owner of this put it together with spare parts... Basically im guessing he had a RV frame laying around that he used and put his COE cab on..

then he used the engine/trans/driveshaft all from another normal sized pickup truck.. Which is why he mounted the engine behind the cab. Sounds like something i would do.. lol
 
  #15  
Old 07-21-2006, 08:59 AM
stockcar nut's Avatar
stockcar nut
stockcar nut is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: OKC, Ok
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
***** B, while you are correct that this is a "cab forward design", untill 1957 when the "C" series tilt cab was introduced Ford called this a "cab over engine" or "COE". Hotrod48, if you want to build one of these give me a shout as I have one that needs a new home. Tom
 


Quick Reply: Interesting way to mount a COE engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.