Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

6.7L CTD for 2007 Ram Likely

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-28-2006, 08:17 PM
DeesO's Avatar
DeesO
DeesO is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: columbus MS
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so are there any upadates on the 6.7?
 
  #47  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:00 PM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There should maybe be more about the 6.7 Cummins tomorrow. 610 ft/lbs is lower than expected, but this might not be right, or it might have something to do with emissions.
 
  #48  
Old 02-28-2006, 09:02 PM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I bet it has to do with emmissions if it is the final number. The 6.4TT has been so far rated at 650 according to the document released a while ago.
 
  #49  
Old 03-01-2006, 02:19 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://www.getrammed.com/index.php?c...2_articleid=88

It is very hard to build an auto to take that much torque. Especially when considering the size constraints. If youve ever seen a medium duty transmission designed to take 700 lb ft youd know they wouldnt fit in a pickup. I doubt Ford nor Dodge are gonna let Chevy be in the lead for long. We been playin leap frog for too many years to stop now.
The reason they increased displacement was to not lose hp during this latest emissions phase. So it is feasable that ratings would stay the same even with the increase. I think it not likely though. Too much rivalry going on in this very competitive market.
 
  #50  
Old 03-01-2006, 03:54 AM
Galizien's Avatar
Galizien
Galizien is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MJD
There should maybe be more about the 6.7 Cummins tomorrow. 610 ft/lbs is lower than expected, but this might not be right, or it might have something to do with emissions.
huh? the current 5.9 is rated at 610.
 
  #51  
Old 03-01-2006, 08:24 AM
duramaximizer's Avatar
duramaximizer
duramaximizer is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know. 610 and a lot more displacement.

700lb feet is not hard to hold in a transmission, they could make them hold that kind of power from the factory if they wanted.

their are plunty of guys that are changing the torque converters and clutch packs in the allison and are holding over a 1000 pound feet of torque. the tranny is not hard to do. emmisions is the hard part.
 
  #52  
Old 03-01-2006, 10:44 AM
MJD's Avatar
MJD
MJD is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take another look at that link that I posted. The full report is now there.
 
  #53  
Old 03-01-2006, 08:20 PM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is hard to do otherwise Ford wouldnt be bringing up the rear.
 
  #54  
Old 03-02-2006, 12:48 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Galizien
huh? the current 5.9 is rated at 610.
There have been fairly reliable rumors putting it at 700 lb ft. So it is lower than the rumor mill had put it. 610 and 305 is slightly closer to the ratings you might see in a medium duty. Mediums are governed lower. You wont see one making peak hp at 3300 rpms.
 
  #55  
Old 03-02-2006, 02:48 AM
BigDaddy6969's Avatar
BigDaddy6969
BigDaddy6969 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The idea of a 610ft.lb.tq doesnt sit well with me. Although i dont think i would buy a 2007 dodge brand new due to its new motor, thanks to ford and it 6.0 fiasco i will never by an untested engine again. Even as it stands untested it doesnt make any sense that the 6.7 would push the same ratings as this year. I guess we will have to wait and see.
 
  #56  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:38 AM
duramaximizer's Avatar
duramaximizer
duramaximizer is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Logical Heritic
It is hard to do otherwise Ford wouldnt be bringing up the rear.


that's what i thought. the new motor would atleast make old standards. i was thinking 400hp/700lb ft. those are the same expectations i have for the new PSD but hey its cool if they want to make the new PSD 305hp
 
  #57  
Old 03-02-2006, 06:09 PM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by duramaximizer


that's what i thought. the new motor would atleast make old standards. i was thinking 400hp/700lb ft. those are the same expectations i have for the new PSD but hey its cool if they want to make the new PSD 305hp
When did it ever say the new PSD would be at 305 hp?
 
  #58  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:18 PM
DD1684's Avatar
DD1684
DD1684 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm still curious about the supposed Ram 4500/5500 trucks. I still haven't seen anything. Sounded pretty convincing on Allpar.com. I'm guessing that was just a vicious rumor perhaps?
 
  #59  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:32 PM
Galizien's Avatar
Galizien
Galizien is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If, the new CTD is rated the same as the previous, then its obvious they are setting it up to increase output in upcomming ram models.
 
  #60  
Old 03-02-2006, 10:50 PM
duramaximizer's Avatar
duramaximizer
duramaximizer is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nick it was [sarcasm font] i really don't think that the new PSD will be 305hp......sorry if i had you all nervous lonely and depressed.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pmoney1983
General Diesel Discussion
5
02-06-2012 05:11 PM
90pioneer
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
13
06-16-2011 08:37 AM
IHbase
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
8
12-20-2009 01:49 PM
Dodge/Cummins
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
33
03-20-2008 09:08 AM
MW95F250
Ford vs The Competition
32
10-25-2005 05:45 PM



Quick Reply: 6.7L CTD for 2007 Ram Likely



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM.