Go Back  Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > Bronco > 1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
Reload this Page >

swap front clip '83 and stroker update

Notices
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco  
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

swap front clip '83 and stroker update

 
  #1  
Old 11-21-2005, 01:48 AM
roger dowty
roger dowty is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: western montana
Posts: 2,068
roger dowty is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.roger dowty is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
swap front clip '83 and stroker update

Looking to swap out the front clip on the bronco I'm building for my son. It's an '83 and I would like to put a 87-91 clip on it. Not sure how the doors will match up etc- not looking for another major project. I owned a couple (4) bronco's and like the front end of the '87-91 best and 80-86 least.

Still working with the windsor but will drop in a stroked cleveland someday if we get serious. Will probably go propane as well and my newly designed propane specific Stroker ('77f150)build is looking to get close to (desktop dyno) 400hp and 430tq with a roller cam and duration of 212/216 @ .050. Its a mileage build!
 
  #2  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:30 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,178
Kemicalburns has a great reputation on FTE.Kemicalburns has a great reputation on FTE.Kemicalburns has a great reputation on FTE.Kemicalburns has a great reputation on FTE.
why a cleveland stroker and not a windsor stroker. parts will be cheaper
 
  #3  
Old 11-21-2005, 01:11 PM
gov2mod
gov2mod is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 391
gov2mod is starting off with a positive reputation.
I go with Kemicalburns on the 351W engine. It can be stroked out to as large as 427 plus it's a lot lighter than a Cleveland or Modified engine. You can get plenty of horsepower out of it and actually since it's lighter you can get the same performance out of less horsepower because of the less weight. Plus you don't have to end up with the sagging front end with all that extra weight up there. As for the front clip I don't think you'll have any problems. The only differences I've noticed on the doors is the vent windows are different on the 92 and newer. I've not seen any difference between your style and the 87-91 style. I've seen the old square front Bronco's like yours with the 92-96 front ends so I know the 87-91 front ends should fit as well.
 
  #4  
Old 11-21-2005, 06:29 PM
BroncoRoadKill's Avatar
BroncoRoadKill
BroncoRoadKill is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 2,195
BroncoRoadKill is starting off with a positive reputation.
I would second the windsor, easier too find parts for to.
As for swapping front clips, the 80-86 has different fenders and the 87-96 has flared fenders. If you were to swap in a 87 and up front clip the fenders would not match tyhe rear panels and look odd, you could swap in later model quarters to and make it look right. I think auto fab did that to there 84 bronco and they swapped it all out to 92-96 body style.
Just my opinion, I love my 82.
 
  #5  
Old 11-21-2005, 09:43 PM
justshootme84
justshootme84 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 1,388
justshootme84 is starting off with a positive reputation.
BRK is right about the fenderwell openings being different style from 86 to 87-up. The clip swap is straightforward, only need to bend the rear-lower fender bolt mount. I was thinking about just cutting out the fender lips front and rear to match up, and gain more tire clearance when I put the 88 clip on my 84.

A 400HP stroker motor sounds like fun!!! The one I'm installing is a 347 c.i.d. (302).
 
  #6  
Old 11-21-2005, 10:15 PM
stevef100s
stevef100s is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Destin/Ft. Walton Beach,
Posts: 1,099
stevef100s is new and has a neutral reputation at this point.
[/QUOTE]plus it's a lot lighter than a Cleveland or Modified engine. [QUOTE]

Sorry, but no it isn't. Not unless you call 25 lbs, "a lot lighter". The 351C is smaller then the 351M/400.

http://raceabilene.com/kelly/hotrod/engine.htm
 
  #7  
Old 11-21-2005, 11:03 PM
gov2mod
gov2mod is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 391
gov2mod is starting off with a positive reputation.
Stevef100s, you are correct about the 351 Cleveland being lighter than the Modified engines and I'm sorry I lumped all of the 335 series of engines together. But since he said he had a 77F150 I assumed he was using a 351M since the 351 Cleveland was discontinued in 1975. But, I still agree with Kemicalburns about the 351W being cheaper (and more plentiful) for parts due to it was made for over 30 years after the end of the Cleveland. I still go beat around in salvage yards for parts and I still see a lot of 351W's. I can't even remember the last time I saw a Cleveland in any salvage yard. I'm not saying there aren't any Clevelands around but there's no question there aren't about a million more Windsors to pick from.
 
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Josh88Ford
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
03-15-2010 09:39 PM
hyperrevsports
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
12-27-2004 12:31 AM
oldhalftons
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
3
03-19-2004 11:55 PM
balingwire
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
4
10-16-2003 10:05 AM
bronco_302
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
2
02-25-2003 07:04 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: swap front clip '83 and stroker update


Contact Us - About Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

© 2019 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.