Small truck w/ Diesel engine
#1
#2
#3
#4
Some 80's (maybe 90's too) Toyotas were diesel too. There's gotta be a "rice-burner" joke in all this somewhere.
Just remembered that those S10's had Isuzu diesels, which reminded me that I've seen LOTS of Isuzu diesel trucks running around.
Just remembered that those S10's had Isuzu diesels, which reminded me that I've seen LOTS of Isuzu diesel trucks running around.
Last edited by 200000+F150; 03-13-2005 at 10:55 AM. Reason: forgot something
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#9
What I don't get is why we don't take that 2.2L turbodiesel and use that to be the second half of those electric hybrid's. Gasoline engines get worse mileage than diesel, so we should just do that.
That's for a Ranger, at least. But my idea is to take the VW Passat which already runs 50mpg+ (one guy I talked to got 52 on a tank, and is always 48+ highway) and use that as the technology bed for an electric hybrid. If a Civic can be taken from 30mpg to 50 or 60, that VW could easily hit 80 with how efficient you can make diesel's.
That's for a Ranger, at least. But my idea is to take the VW Passat which already runs 50mpg+ (one guy I talked to got 52 on a tank, and is always 48+ highway) and use that as the technology bed for an electric hybrid. If a Civic can be taken from 30mpg to 50 or 60, that VW could easily hit 80 with how efficient you can make diesel's.
#10
#11
I owned an 86 Ranger diesel. It was good little truck, but parts were extremely hard to come by. Jeep offered a diesel in their Comanche, the same motor was offered in the Cherokee. The Comanche is larger than the other trucks I see listed here, It was nearly the same size as a Dakota. The motor was made by Renault, and was also used in the Winnebago Lesharo.
#12
Originally Posted by Saurian
What I don't get is why we don't take that 2.2L turbodiesel and use that to be the second half of those electric hybrid's. Gasoline engines get worse mileage than diesel, so we should just do that.
That's for a Ranger, at least. But my idea is to take the VW Passat which already runs 50mpg+ (one guy I talked to got 52 on a tank, and is always 48+ highway) and use that as the technology bed for an electric hybrid. If a Civic can be taken from 30mpg to 50 or 60, that VW could easily hit 80 with how efficient you can make diesel's.
That's for a Ranger, at least. But my idea is to take the VW Passat which already runs 50mpg+ (one guy I talked to got 52 on a tank, and is always 48+ highway) and use that as the technology bed for an electric hybrid. If a Civic can be taken from 30mpg to 50 or 60, that VW could easily hit 80 with how efficient you can make diesel's.
#13
Gelling is not generally a problem when in motion, unless the temp drops fairly quickly. The motion of the fuel in the tank is enough to keep the fuel liquid. The problem is when the vehicle sits still.
BTW, I don't which one's sig it is. But I am a 'Jeep' guy, and I do get giddy about D-44's under lightweight rigs. The sig is funny.
BTW, I don't which one's sig it is. But I am a 'Jeep' guy, and I do get giddy about D-44's under lightweight rigs. The sig is funny.
#14
#15
geling isn't problem when in motion- Bs I geled up my pick-up going down the road two years ago. It was -35 degrees out with the wind chill. if it isn't warmed up under the hood and you go down the road it is more likly to gel. if its sitting in your drive way running it probably will not gel. there is addative in the fuel to stop it from geling in your drive way but when you start it up and go running in to the wind at 70 mph its going to be more likely to gel up. If the thing shuts off going down the road and cools off too much before if starts up again it. its more likly to gel. on the other hand if I had my snow plow on the truck I didn't have to worry about it.