Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

Dodge 3500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:43 AM
  #31  
BigGunZ's Avatar
BigGunZ
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Jax Fla.
OK, here are the numbers for my 05 Ram 3500 4x4...


GVWR 12,200
-Weight Approx 7300 lbs

=4900lbs

You have to keep in mind that cargo includes passengers. I'm also fairly certain that the numbers are different between 4x2, 4x4, long wheel base and short wheel base. The different models of the 3500's each have a different vehicle weight so payload needs to be adjusted accordingly. My 3500 is likely the heaviest model (4x4, LWB, Quad Cab, Dually) so it stands to reason that it has the least payload capacity. A SWB, regular cab, dually can prolly haul more crap.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #32  
opposable's Avatar
opposable
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Have you actually weighed your truck, BigGunZ? That isn't meant to offend, but unless you have actually weighed your truck, you really don't know the payload capacity.

The stated "payload capacity" means very little. Until one actually has a true empty weight of their vehicle, payload capacity is a pure guess. Payload = GVWR - empty weight.

Anyone who figures their payload without actually weighing the vehicle is only guessing.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 01:53 PM
  #33  
BigGunZ's Avatar
BigGunZ
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Jax Fla.
No offense taken but Dodge weighed it so why do I have to? Manufacturers are required by law to supply weight data to the state and the registration lists the weight as 7370 lbs. Granted, if I scale it the numbers likely won't match accurately but I'd bet it would be within +/-100 lbs. I'm simply pointing out that a Dodge 3500 has a much larger payload capacity than this thread implies....about 1900 lbs more.

Quite frankly, comparing payload capacity of the big 3's one ton offerings is silly and is splitting hairs at best...neither of them has any major advantage over the other, and I've yet to meet a pickup owner that weighs his cargo. I've owned 3 Fords...an F100, 150, and 250 and I've almost always been limited by space. The only exception being when I was hauling Gravel in my F250...the limiting factor was usually the tires which brings up a valid point...the ratings of the tires and the GAWR (gross axle weight rating) are more of a measure of hauling ability.
 

Last edited by IB Tim; Aug 31, 2005 at 04:51 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #34  
opposable's Avatar
opposable
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Just through my own personal experiences, I don't trust the weight given by the manufacturer. That doesn't mean that I think they are lieing, I just don't know under what circumstances they weighed the truck. Did it have a full tank of gas? Was anyone riding in it? etc. Just as an example, the truck in my sig came to the dealer weighing 7200 lbs. supposedly. I had it weighed at a truck stop with a full tank of gas, no passengers, and it weighed 7900 lbs. Take it for what it is worth.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 03:10 PM
  #35  
BigGunZ's Avatar
BigGunZ
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Jax Fla.
I don't doubt you. The weight reported to the state and listed on the registration is dry weight and for the purposes of figuring payload, is sufficient. Curb weight is usually the weight full of fluids with a half tank of fuel. Either way, payload capacity is pretty meaningless when you're talking 1 ton trucks...you will almost always run out of box space before you exceed the weight unless you're hauling gravel or dirt. Payload capacity is merely a number that Nissan uses to try convince people that their truck is better than a F150. Have you ever seen that commercial....

"A Nissan Titan gets the job done the first time"

It's a joke. As if the F150 driver is going to leave 3 bags of feed behind just because he exceeded his payload capacity even though he has room for it.

I don't know about you but I have never based a purchasing decision on payload capacity. More than anytihng else, it's just a number the mfgr's use to sell trucks to those that know nothing about them.
 

Last edited by IB Tim; Aug 31, 2005 at 04:51 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 03:40 PM
  #36  
opposable's Avatar
opposable
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Agreed. In my case, the payload comes into play because I haul a 22' gooseneck trailer, and the pin weight eats most of my "payload capacity." I don't like numbers like "towing capacity" and "payload capacity" because they are often based off of a truck with no options, hardly any gas, etc. That was my original point. Ford says my payload capacity for my truck is something like 4200 lbs. However, if I put 4200 lbs. in my bed, I would be over GVWR at the very least. Ford says I can tow 15,400 lbs. in fifth-wheel configuration, but if I put a trailer on my truck that size, the pin weight will almost certainly put me over my GVWR, at the very least. The important numbers one should be concerned with are GVWR, GAWR, and perhaps GCVWR. Manufacturer numbers are used to show their vehicle in the best light, and are rarely directly applicable to trucks you buy off of the lot.
 

Last edited by IB Tim; Aug 31, 2005 at 04:51 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #37  
BigGunZ's Avatar
BigGunZ
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Jax Fla.
Originally Posted by opposable
Manufacturer numbers are used to show their vehicle in the best light, and are rarely directly applicable to trucks you buy off of the lot.
Absolutely. Your F350 is a shining example of how meaningless those numbers are concerning 1-tons...we all know those things can haul.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:20 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE