GM to layoff 25,000+ people...
#3
#6
No these are jobs that are gone + two plants to be named soon.
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
#7
The UAW is squarely to blame for that. Ford and GM spend more on health coverage than for steel. Over $1200.00 of every vehicle sold goes to healthcare. Poorly negotiated contracts bring that on. That's over a BILLION dollars that Ford has to pay just for producing the F-Series. That raises the fixed cost on every vehicle made, resulting in a profit reduction as well as higher prices for consumers.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
No these are jobs that are gone + two plants to be named soon.
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
United and Delta are different in that is is about overhead because they do not produce anything only provide a service. While it is true theat the legacy cost are hurting GM it still holds that if you don't have product you must close or combine capabilities.
#9
I think it is a combination of overhead and over capacity...
The big 3 have realised that they aren't going to keep making money if they concentrate purely on their American market.
The American market has developed fully at the moment, and they are now throwing money at creating new markets.
Ford for the 1st quarter of this year (and it may have continued into the 2nd quarter, I don't know) put a worldwide restraint on hiring any new people.
So if a person retired/left/got fired etc. they could not be replaced.
This was primarily to show shareholders an increase in profits.
The big 3 have realised that they aren't going to keep making money if they concentrate purely on their American market.
The American market has developed fully at the moment, and they are now throwing money at creating new markets.
Ford for the 1st quarter of this year (and it may have continued into the 2nd quarter, I don't know) put a worldwide restraint on hiring any new people.
So if a person retired/left/got fired etc. they could not be replaced.
This was primarily to show shareholders an increase in profits.
#10
Originally Posted by 73Fastbackv10
The UAW is squarely to blame for that. Ford and GM spend more on health coverage than for steel. Over $1200.00 of every vehicle sold goes to healthcare. Poorly negotiated contracts bring that on. That's over a BILLION dollars that Ford has to pay just for producing the F-Series. That raises the fixed cost on every vehicle made, resulting in a profit reduction as well as higher prices for consumers.
But I could not believe what I read in the article though concerning the contract though. I have never seen a contract where people get paid even if the factory is shut down. Anytime a union write a contract that does not allow a company to operate at a profit they are just hurting themselves. It is this type of action that gives unions a bad name.
#11
#12
This will affect Canada in a big way as well. Th CAW was shocked, as the article put it. I believe healthcare is a huge part of it, $5 billion a year, $1500 a vehicle. That is a lot of money. They lost over a billion this first quarter over last year. Isn't there some sort of cap that we can put on the foreign automakers number of vehicles allowed over seas in a year? Is there already such a thing?
#13
#14