Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

GM to layoff 25,000+ people...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:25 PM
mwpierson's Avatar
mwpierson
mwpierson is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GM to layoff 25,000+ people...

in the US between 2005 and 2008. Guess it's not looking good for 'em after all.

Mike
 
  #2  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:49 PM
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
rusty70f100 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As much as I dislike GM vehicles, it pains me to see this. 25,000 good American workers losing their jobs is not something I like to see happen.
 
  #3  
Old 06-07-2005, 04:02 PM
osbornk's Avatar
osbornk
osbornk is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It will impact a lot more than 25,000. It will impact the employees of suppliers, the businesses that these people buy from and many others. Each job loss impacts several others.
 
  #4  
Old 06-07-2005, 06:58 PM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
This will impact all of America this is VERY SAD
 
  #5  
Old 06-07-2005, 07:22 PM
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
rusty70f100 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Were they planning to eliminate these jobs entirely, or move them elsewhere, such as Mexico?
 
  #6  
Old 06-07-2005, 07:43 PM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
No these are jobs that are gone + two plants to be named soon.
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
 
  #7  
Old 06-07-2005, 10:05 PM
73Fastbackv10's Avatar
73Fastbackv10
73Fastbackv10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orange
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The UAW is squarely to blame for that. Ford and GM spend more on health coverage than for steel. Over $1200.00 of every vehicle sold goes to healthcare. Poorly negotiated contracts bring that on. That's over a BILLION dollars that Ford has to pay just for producing the F-Series. That raises the fixed cost on every vehicle made, resulting in a profit reduction as well as higher prices for consumers.
 
  #8  
Old 06-07-2005, 10:19 PM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers
tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tim Lamkin
No these are jobs that are gone + two plants to be named soon.
Probably oldest ones.
Only North American is affected
Pray for GM because this could be a very bad spiral down for many not just GM
This is all about overhead, like retirements and insurances, so goes GM many could follow...just like Delta is now trying to follow United ...not good .
This is not about overhead IMO. Its all about over capacity. Even whithout the medical plan cost and there mismanagement or the pension plans they would still need to close the factories. If you are not running at close to 100% utilization you are losing money.

United and Delta are different in that is is about overhead because they do not produce anything only provide a service. While it is true theat the legacy cost are hurting GM it still holds that if you don't have product you must close or combine capabilities.
 
  #9  
Old 06-07-2005, 10:32 PM
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
BigF350 is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Melbourne, Aus
Posts: 18,790
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 9 Posts
I think it is a combination of overhead and over capacity...
The big 3 have realised that they aren't going to keep making money if they concentrate purely on their American market.
The American market has developed fully at the moment, and they are now throwing money at creating new markets.
Ford for the 1st quarter of this year (and it may have continued into the 2nd quarter, I don't know) put a worldwide restraint on hiring any new people.
So if a person retired/left/got fired etc. they could not be replaced.
This was primarily to show shareholders an increase in profits.
 
  #10  
Old 06-07-2005, 10:54 PM
tmyers's Avatar
tmyers
tmyers is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Everett, Wa
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 73Fastbackv10
The UAW is squarely to blame for that. Ford and GM spend more on health coverage than for steel. Over $1200.00 of every vehicle sold goes to healthcare. Poorly negotiated contracts bring that on. That's over a BILLION dollars that Ford has to pay just for producing the F-Series. That raises the fixed cost on every vehicle made, resulting in a profit reduction as well as higher prices for consumers.
You are right but for the wrong reason. Health care cost are affecting everyone and is not just a Ford and GM problem. The more people who do not have health care coverage the more it cost for health care, be it taxes to cover people without coverage or higher insurance premiums because less people are covered.

But I could not believe what I read in the article though concerning the contract though. I have never seen a contract where people get paid even if the factory is shut down. Anytime a union write a contract that does not allow a company to operate at a profit they are just hurting themselves. It is this type of action that gives unions a bad name.
 
  #11  
Old 06-08-2005, 01:26 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
GM to cut 25,000 jobs

I read this in the news today. GM is cutting 25,000 jobs over the next few years. I'm not surprised, but it sure puts this whole thing into perspective for me. Whats are your thoughts?
 
  #12  
Old 06-08-2005, 01:46 AM
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
NickFordMan is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
This will affect Canada in a big way as well. Th CAW was shocked, as the article put it. I believe healthcare is a huge part of it, $5 billion a year, $1500 a vehicle. That is a lot of money. They lost over a billion this first quarter over last year. Isn't there some sort of cap that we can put on the foreign automakers number of vehicles allowed over seas in a year? Is there already such a thing?
 
  #13  
Old 06-08-2005, 06:09 AM
MofW's Avatar
MofW
MofW is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a cut back just like in anyother company. It's either to save money because they need to save money or their operations have become more efficient. Most likely the first one. Only the people sitting in the board room really know.
 
  #14  
Old 06-08-2005, 07:20 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
Terry follow the news and the stories and see if you still disagree with my view...I am only typing what is out there in the news. If it is correct or not....well
 
  #15  
Old 06-08-2005, 07:24 AM
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
IB Tim is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 3rd Rock
Posts: 161,998
Received 58 Likes on 30 Posts
TWO Threads merged!
 


Quick Reply: GM to layoff 25,000+ people...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 PM.